Monday, March 07, 2016

EID Journal: MERS-CoV Antibodies in Humans, Africa, 2013–2014

Credit CDC

 # 11,107

One of the truisms of infectious disease reporting is that surveillance  - even in technologically advanced societies - generally only reveals a fraction of the overall burden of any infectious disease. 

And these shortfalls are in countries with modern medical infrastructures that were actively looking for evidence of cases. 

For much of the world, and for many emerging diseases, no one is looking.

Last October, in WHO Scales Up Influenza Surveillance In Africa, we looked at the many challenges of recognizing and reporting human novel flu infections in nations where basic medical services are lacking, and where the burden of other viral diseases is very high. 

Just as we know avian H5N1 circulates in African poultry and wild birds, we know that MERS-CoV infects camels in Africa (see Eurosurveillance: MERS-CoV In Nigerian Camels), yet we've no reports of human MERS infection in Africa.
MERS, like avian flu, generally starts out with a fever and a `flu-like illness’, and may be mild, moderate, or severe. Unfortunately, without laboratory testing there is really no way to differentiate MERS or avian flu from severe seasonal flu or of other – far more common – respiratory infections. 

One solution is to conduct a seroprevalence study, looking for antibodies to a specific virus in a community's archived blood samples, as was done last year in Saudi MERS Seroprevalence Study mentioned above.

Professor Drosten is back this week with a new study and a new team of collaborators, analyzing archived blood samples collected from 1,122 livestock handlers in Kenya during 2013-2014.

While the Kenyan study is far smaller, this latest hunt for MERS antibodies has produced remarkably similar results to what was found in KSA; (1.52% vs. 1.43% positivity by rELISA and 0.15% vs. 0.18% positivity by PRNT for Kenya vs. Saudi Arabia, respectively)

I've only reproduced some excerpts, so follow the link to read the dispatch in its entirety.

Volume 22, Number 6—June 2016


MERS-CoV Antibodies in Humans, Africa, 2013–2014

Anne Liljander1, Benjamin Meyer1, Joerg Jores, Marcel A. Müller, Erik Lattwein, Ian Njeru, Bernard Bett, Christian DrostenComments to Author , and Victor Max Corman  


Dromedaries in Africa and elsewhere carry the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). To search for evidence of autochthonous MERS-CoV infection in humans, we tested archived serum from livestock handlers in Kenya for MERS-CoV antibodies. Serologic evidence of infection was confirmed for 2 persons sampled in 2013 and 2014.


The absence of autochthonous human MERS-CoV infections in Africa has triggered hypotheses regarding differences in disease transmission between Africa and the Arabian Peninsula and has raised doubts regarding the role of camels as a source of infection. Our study provides evidence for unrecorded human MERS-CoV infections in Kenya. 

The proportion of seropositive specimens that we found is comparable to previously reported proportions of unrecorded infections in the general population in Saudia Arabia (1.52% vs. 1.43% positivity by rELISA and 0.15% vs. 0.18% positivity by PRNT for Kenya vs. Saudi Arabia, respectively) (6). 

Because of an apparently low infection rate and a bias toward reporting severe cases, the discovery of unreported MERS cases requires testing of large sample sizes with well-validated serologic methods (6). Although the number of samples we tested was approximately only one tenth of the number of samples tested during the Saudi Arabia study, the proportion of seropositive specimens may be similar in Kenya and Saudi Arabia. 

The lack of a well-developed public health system in parts of Africa could lead to underdiagnosis of clinical cases and would therefore prevent case notification. Moreover, less accessible hospital care might preclude large nosocomial outbreaks as have been observed in countries on the Arabian Peninsula and in South Korea. Other possible explanations for the absence of confirmed and reported clinical cases of MERS-CoV infection in Africa include lesser virulence of strains from Africa and cultural differences that might cause persons of different age ranges to be exposed to the virus.

On the basis of the ability of MERS-CoV to infect a wide range of hosts in cell culture experiments (15), it remains to be excluded that other wild and livestock animals might act as additional sources of human MERS-CoV infection.
It is paramount to characterize MERS-CoVs from humans, camels, or tentative other animal hosts in Africa. For increased understanding of any possible differences in pathogenicity and transmission potential, these MERS-CoV strains should be compared with isolates from the Middle East. 
(Continue . . .)

No comments: