Friday, October 09, 2026

Isaias Forecast To Become A Major Hurricane Later Today - Landfall Tonight

 

#19,366

While wind shear may lower its intensity a bit (depending on timing) as it approaches the coast, Isaias is expected to be at least a strong CAT 2 storm at landfall, possibly higher.  

Regardless of its intensity, Isaias is expected to produce life-threatening surge, high winds, and torrential rains.  Residents in the affected area should hurry to complete the preparations today. 


While most people prepare for the actual storm, often the days (and sometimes weeks) following the storm are the most stressful.  

The power may be out for days, floodwaters may contain hidden dangers, local stores may be closed, and people may risk injury using chainsaws, generators, or ladders. 


I've written extensively on After The Storm Passes, but many of those preparedness links are no longer active. The CDC has updated their Preparing for Hurricanes or Other Tropical Storms webpage, covering most of those topics. 

A few related blogs you may wish to revisit include:

WSDA: Washington confirms first detection of avian influenza in dairy cattle


#19,365

While the USDA's dashboard (above) has not yet been updated, late yesterday the State of Washington and the USDA/APHIS announced that two cattle herds in Washington have tested positive for HPAI H5 clade 2.3.4.4b (N type and genotype pending); the first such detection in that state. 

This is the first new state to report an outbreak in 2026 (the last being Wisconsin in December 2025), and the 20th state to report dairy cattle H5N1 infection (Oregon is marked on the above map due to H5N1 in pigs). 

First, the Washington State Announcement: 



OLYMPIA – Oct. 8, 2026 –The USDA National Veterinary Services Laboratory (NVSL) confirmed the first detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 in two Yakima County dairy farms in Washington state by the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory.

For the last two years, the Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) and the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory at Washington State University have conducted over 7,000 surveillance tests for HPAI that have all been free of the disease.

This marks the first known case of HPAI in cattle in Washington state. Dairy cattle in a total of  19 states have been infected since the start of the outbreak in March 2024. Washington State Department of Agriculture conducted on-farm investigations, testing, and gathered additional epidemiological information to better understand this detection and limit further disease spread. The two farms are under quarantine and have employed strict biosecurity measures. Veterinarians are working to treat sick cows. 

Pasteurized milk products remain safe for consumers, and milk supply shortages are not expected.

WSDA urges livestock owners statewide to report any clinical signs of illness to their veterinarian, including:
  • Changes in milk appearance (thicker, often yellowish to brown)
  • Decreased milk production
  • Decline in feed intake
  • Fever
  • Respiratory symptoms
  • Changes in manure
  • Steep drop in rumination and rumen motility
If you notice any of these signs, isolate affected animals and contact your veterinarian and WSDA at 360-902-1878 or ahealth@agr.wa.gov.

Most cattle affected by HPAI recover with supportive care with recovery typically taking about six weeks.

“We appreciate how difficult this is for our dairy families, farmworkers and veterinarians that are working hard to keep animals safe and healthy,” said Washington State Veterinarian Amber Itle, VMD, MS. “The most important thing you can do is implement enhanced biosecurity and report symptoms immediately if animals show signs of illness.”

HPAI can spread between dairy cattle through infected animals and contaminated milk, equipment, vehicles, clothing, footwear and other materials or people that move between farms. Wild birds can also carry HPAI, but they are not considered the primary source of spread of the virus between dairy herds.

Protecting your herd
  • Follow your biosecurity plan or write one with your veterinarian to incorporate enhanced biosecurity measures:
  • Limit lactating animal movement between farms unless necessary
  • Do not share equipment, vehicles or workers
  • Clean and disinfect footwear before entering livestock areas
  • Limit visitors and require clean clothing and footwear
  • Isolate new animals for 30 days before introducing them to your herd
  • Separate sick or suspect cattle from healthy cattle when possible
  • Practice good milking hygiene and keep milk from sick or suspect cattle out of the bulk tank
  • Restrict access to open water used by wild waterfowl
  • Employ wildlife, wild bird, rodent and vector control
  • Minimize contact with wild birds and other animals, particularly around cattle, feed, water and equipment
Dairy product safety

Pasteurization inactivates viruses and bacteria in milk, including HPAI virus, helping ensure the safety of the dairy supply. Infected cows can shed the virus in their milk, making raw milk and other raw dairy products unsafe for consumption. Avoid raw dairy product consumption, and do not allow your pets to consume raw milk or other dairy products, or raw foods such as raw meat.

Human health and safety

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) currently consider the risk to the public from avian influenza to be low. However, people who work with or have recreational contact with infected birds, cattle or other potentially infected domestic or wild animals are at higher risk and should take precautions, including wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gloves, masks, eye protection and fluid-resistant coveralls or other outerwear.


The USDA/APHIS statement:


Milk Supply Safe; Considered Low Risk to Human Health and Safety

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 8, 2026—Today, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) confirmed via PCR (polymerase chain reaction) detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5 clade 2.3.4.4b in two dairy cattle herds in Washington. APHIS will complete genetic sequencing and announce final results as soon as they are available. The affected herds were tested after exhibiting clinical signs consistent with avian influenza. Prior to this detection, the herds consistently tested negative through routine surveillance conducted under the National Milk Testing Strategy program.

These are the first confirmed case detections of HPAI in livestock in the State of Washington. While dairy cattle in a total of 19 states have been infected since the start of the outbreak in March 2024, APHIS has seen cases in only a small number of states this year. APHIS is working closely with the Washington Department of Agriculture to conduct additional on-farm investigations, diagnostic testing, and epidemiological data collection to better understand the detection and prevent further disease spread.

The detection does not change USDA’s HPAI eradication strategy. Biosecurity is still key to mitigating the risk of disease introduction or spread between premises. APHIS recommends enhanced biosecurity measures for all dairy farms. Producers should immediately report any livestock with clinical signs, or any unusual sick or dead wildlife, to their state veterinarian. Financial assistance is available to enhance biosecurity and offset costs associated with HPAI.

This detection does not pose a risk to consumer health or affect the safety of the commercial milk supply. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is confident that pasteurization is effective at inactivating HPAI virus, and that the commercial, pasteurized milk supply is safe. Dairies are required to send only milk from healthy animals into processing for human consumption; milk from impacted animals is being diverted from the commercial milk tank or destroyed so that it does not enter the human food supply.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), HPAI viruses circulating in birds and U.S. dairy cattle pose a low risk to the general public in the United States. However, people who have job-related or recreational exposures to infected birds or mammals are at higher risk of infection and should take appropriate precautions outlined in CDC guidance.

While I'm confident in the ability of pasteurization to effectively kill the H5N1 virus in commercial milk, Washington is one of the few U.S. states that allows the sale of raw milk in grocery stores, natural food markets, food co-ops, and direct-to-consumer farm stores.

In 2024 and 2025 both Washington and Oregon repeatedly warned on the dangers of feeding raw milk or raw food products to cats, after a number of cats died from H5N1 (see Washington State (WSDA) Announces 2 Households with H5N1 Infected Cats Linked to Raw Food).

Hopefully people will take the risks seriously, and we won't see a replay of those events - or something worse - this fall. 

Thursday, October 08, 2026

WHO: Dr. Tedros Statement On `Plague' Incident In Russia

 

#19,364

Two days ago the WHO posted the above statement on the Russian `Lab Leak' Story we've been following for nearly a week.  Since then, we've continued to see denials from the Russian government, which insists they are dealing with a single fatal case of pneumonia of unknown etiology.

They have reported no plague; no laboratory accident; and no epidemiological risk to the public.

At the same time, Rospotrebnadzor reportedly claimed they'd performed  nearly 5,000 `laboratory tests'  since this `non-event' supposedly happened, which seems a rather extreme response. 

While it is fair to say that we don't know exactly what happened - or may still be happening - at that Siberian lab, the Russian's explanations are meeting with a fair amount of international skepticism. 

A little over an hour ago the WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus  posted the following statement (made yesterday, Oct. 7th) on Twitter/X    

Last Friday, the 2nd of October, the first media reports emerged of a suspected case of pneumonic plague in a laboratory worker at the Irkutsk Antiplague Research Institute in the Russian Federation. The lab worker died after being hospitalized with severe pneumonia. Initial media reports suggested pneumonic plague following an accidental lab exposure. is aware that the Russian government held a meeting on the 2nd of October because they suspected a resident of the Irkutsk oblast had contracted a dangerous infection. On Saturday, WHO asked the Russian Federation for more information, in accordance with the International Health Regulations. On Tuesday, the Russian Federation responded, saying that no case of plague had recently been reported in the Irkutsk oblast, and that they had placed about 200 contacts in quarantine. However, WHO has requested further information on the laboratory tests conducted on the individual who died and the contacts, more detail on what prompted the public health measures, and details about the health status of the contacts. We have also sought verification of media reports of a second employee with pneumonia of undetermined cause. WHO has offered technical support related to plague and lab biosafety and biosecurity. As we don’t yet have the full picture of this event, we are not able to conduct a full risk assessment. Timely, complete and transparent information sharing under the International Health Regulations is essential to clarify conflicting reports and enable an accurate assessment of potential public health risks.

While cloaked in diplomatic prose, it seems pretty clear the WHO isn't fully buying what the Russian government is selling. 

Stay tuned.  This could have legs. 

ECDC Assessment: Zoonotic influenza A(H5) vaccination in humans in the EU/EEA


#19,363

In the summer of 2024 , the EU Commission secured access for Member States to purchase 665,000 doses of zoonotic influenza vaccines to prevent avian flu, with the first shipment scheduled to go to Finland, which had recently experienced a prolonged H5 outbreak in fur farms (see Finland: MOH Announcement On Avian Flu Vaccine Availability For People At High Risk).

From the EU 6/24 announcement:
The vaccine is intended for those most exposed to potential transfers of avian influenza from birds or animals, such as poultry farm workers and veterinarians. It aims to prevent the spread or potential outbreaks of avian influenza in Europe, protecting citizens and livelihoods. The vaccine is the only preventive zoonotic avian influenza vaccine currently authorized in the EU.

Fifteen EU and EEA Member States are participating in this voluntary procurement with the company Seqirus UK Ltd. The contract allows each participating country to take into account their public health context and order vaccines depending on national need. The contract will run for a maximum of 4 years.
This initial order was enough to vaccinate 330,000 people (assuming 2 doses each), with an option to buy another 40 million doses if needed. But the EU would need nearly 900 million doses to cover their entire population.

Last May, in Vaccines: Lessons from the 2024 avian influenza vaccination campaign in Finland: a qualitative inquiry, we looked at the disappointingly low uptake of the H5 vaccine by Finland's target groups, with the authors reporting:
In 2024, Finland became a global forerunner to offer H5 vaccine to occupational risk groups, specifically fur and poultry workers, following an extensive HPAI H5N1 outbreak in 2023 in fur-farmed minks and foxes. Despite targeted efforts to reach the people at increased risk, only 8,6% of the target population received the first dose and 7,5% completed both doses.

While disappointing, this uptake is not unexpected, given the hurdles public health has faced getting poultry, swine, and fur farmers to get the seasonal flu vaccine to try to prevent reverse zoonosis. 

And, as we've seen previously (see Two Surveys (UK & U.S.) Illustrating The Public's Lack of Concern Over Avian Flu) - in addition to growing vaccine hesitancy - the public appears largely unconvinced over the HPAI threat. 

Last December in ECDC Pre-pandemic Guidance: Strategies to Fight Avian and Swine flu in Humans we looked at a  71-page operations framework for European countries to use when dealing with outbreaks of novel swine or avian influenza. 

One of the topics covered was potential pre-pandemic vaccination of high-risk individuals with a zoonotic influenza A(H5) vaccine.

Yesterday the ECDC published the results of a survey of 30 EU/EEA member nations on their plans for current or future H5 vaccination of humans, of which 27 responded. 

This is a fairly brief report (9 pages), which finds 5 (19%) of reporting countries have begun limited vaccination of high-risk individuals, another 11% plan to begin offering the vaccine in the next year, and the remaining 70% have no plans in place at this time. 


While there are sizable gaps in the data, uptake of the vaccine - as we saw in Finland - appears to have been quite limited.   


All of this is self-reported data, of course - and since there is no standardized reporting format - making comparisons between countries is extremely difficult. 

Follow the link to read the report in its entirety.  I'll have a brief postscript after the break. 



Assessment
7 October 2026

Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) continues to circulate widely in wild birds and cause outbreaks in poultry and other animals across Europe. Despite extensive circulation, human infections remain rare and no human cases have been confirmed in the EU/EEA to date.

Considering this, ECDC assesses the risk from A(H5N1) viruses circulating in Europe as low for the general population and low to moderate for people occupationally or otherwise exposed to infected animals or contaminated environments.

Key findings
  • Twenty-seven of 30 EU/EEA countries responded to the survey on influenza A(H5) vaccination in humans – national plans and implementation status in EU/EEA. Eight countries reported having national A(H5) vaccination recommendations in place, eight were currently developing them, and 11 had no plans at the time of the survey.
  • Implementation of the plans remained limited: five countries had started vaccination campaigns (Austria, Finland, Lithuania, the Netherlands and Portugal) and three planned to do so within one year. Priority groups most commonly included in the cohort to be vaccinated were veterinarians and animal-health staff, culling teams, laboratory staff and workers in farming and the poultry sector.
  • Most countries reported that they are monitoring or planning to monitor vaccine uptake; the majority through immunisation registries.
  • Reported vaccine uptake in reporting countries was generally low outside laboratory settings, but data were incomplete and not comparable across countries.
  • Overall, results were heterogeneous in the EU/EEA due to variation in national recommendations, implementation plans, delivery arrangements and uptake monitoring. For preparedness purposes, countries would benefit from clearly defined programme objectives and scenario-based triggers, tested delivery pathways, targeted communication and uptake-monitoring plans. 

Publication file



In addition to the EU's purchase, over the past 3 years we've seen a number of other countries announced their intention to stockpile limited supplies of a pre-pandemic H5N1 vaccine, including: 
All are quantities that might help protect those occupationally most at risk during an H5Nx outbreak, but the general population would likely have to wait 6 months or longer before large quantities of vaccine would be made available (see Referral: SCI AM - A Bird Flu Vaccine Might Come Too Late to Save Us from H5N1).

At least that's the theory.  

Whether we'll be ready to react to an actual human outbreak remains to be seen. 

 

Wednesday, October 07, 2026

NHC: Isaias Now A Tropical Storm - Forecast to Threaten Northern Gulf Coast As A Strong Hurricane


 #19,362

October storms born in the Bay of Campeche have a reputation for spinning up rapidly as they approach a landfall.  Although that doesn't always happen, it occurs often enough to take these late season storms seriously.

While conditions in the gulf were described as `only marginally conducive for development' just 24 hours ago, the NHC is now forecasting Isaias to ramp up to a strong CAT 2 hurricane by the end of the week.

Estimated wind speeds and positions from today's (Oct 7th) NHC discussion:

Watches and warnings have not been raised yet, but the NHC will probably do so later today. For now the NHC's key messages to the public are:

 

Currently, it appears that anywhere from the western panhandle of Florida to central Louisiana are in the cone, but high winds, surge tides, and heavy rains are likely to impact well beyond those limits. 

Inland flooding could occur hundreds of miles inland, and spin-off tornadoes are possible across much of the southeast. Widespread power outages are likely. 
 
If this is your first hurricane season - or you are just in need of a refresher - you'll find a number of short videos on hurricane prepareded at this NOAA website:

Hurricane Prep: social media (English)

The Hurricane Preparedness Week Social Media Plan

2026 SOCIAL MEDIA PLANS AND VIDEOS English: May 3 - May 9, 2026

En español: 3 de mayo - 9 de mayo de 2026

Chinese: 年5月3日 - 2025年5月9日

Vietnamese: Ngày 3 Tháng 5, Năm - Ngày 9 Tháng 5, Năm 2026

English: Videos

En español: Videos

#HurricaneStrong #HurricanePrep

Please help the NWS spread the word about Hurricane Preparedness Week (May 3-May 9, 2026) on social media! Everyone is welcome to use the text and images provided below to help the NWS build a Weather-Ready Nation.

May 3, 2026 — Know Your Risk: Wind & Water

May 4, 2026 — Prepare Before Hurricane Season

May 5, 2026 — Understand Forecast Information

May 6, 2026 — Get Moving When a Storm Threatens

May 7, 2026 — Stay Protected During Storms

May 8, 2026 — Use Caution After Storms

May 9, 2026 —Take Action Today


While this blog, and many other internet sources (I follow Mark Sudduth's Hurricane Track, and Mike's Weather page), will cover this year's hurricane season. your primary source of forecast information should always be the National Hurricane Center in Miami, Florida.

These are the real experts, and the only ones you should rely on to track and forecast the storm.

If you are on Twitter, you should also follow @FEMA, @NHC_Atlantic, @NHC_Pacific and @ReadyGov and of course take direction from your local Emergency Management Office.

Referral Preprint: The mammalian-adaptive PB2-E627K substitution preserves viral fitness of clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 HPAIV in birds.

 
#19,362

While worrisome, HPAI H5Nx remains primarily an avian-adapted virus, despite increasingly spilling over into mammalian species (including humans).  These spillovers, however, provide opportunities for the virus to adapt - through amino acid substitutions (mutations) - to mammals. 

Without changes the virus remains optimized for avian physiology.  Mammalian infection remains possible, but is less likely to spread efficiently through a population.  

While there are a number of these adaptive mutations, one we watch for carefully is PB2-E627K, which increases the ability of avian flu viruses to replicate in a mammalian host. 

This mutation is rarely seen in birds, but can appear in mammals after they are infected by birds (see Mammalian Adaptation in the PB2 Gene of Avian H5N1 Influenza Virus).

It has always been a bit of a mystery why this 627K mutation hasn't become `fixed' in avian hosts during this current panzootic, with some researchers suggesting it may impose some kind of  `fitness penalty' in birds. 

While found in about 1% of avian H5N1 sequences, it is reportedly more common (based on limited surveillance) in avian hosts infected with H5N5. 

In 2024, however, we looked at a slightly different mutation at the same location in the PB2 gene (E627V), which has emerged in poultry viruses (see Preprint: An Emerging PB2-627 Polymorphism Increases the Pandemic Potential of Avian Influenza).

The authors report that the PB2-627V mutation not only maintains viral fitness in poultry, it facilitates the respiratory transmission of AIVs between ferrets. The concern was this mutation could go a long way in overcoming the `species barrier' between avian and mammalian-adapted influenza viruses.

This 627V mutation has also appeared in other avian viruses (H9N2, H7N9, H5N6, etc.) with zoonotic potential (see Vet. Research: E627V Mutation in PB2 Protein Promotes the Mammalian Adaptation of Novel H10N3 Avian Influenza Virus).

All of which brings us to a preprint, authored by a number of well known UK researchers, which investigates whether the PB2 E627K mutation exacts a fitness penalty in birds.

They report finding no `measurable fitness cost in chickens and ducks', which suggests there may be other `ecological and epidemiological constraints' at work.

This, they suggest, means that mammalian-adaptive mutations acquired during spillover could spread and persist in avian populations, potentially raising zoonotic risk. 

They go on to stress the value of surveillance for such mutations in birds.

Due to copyright issues, I can't do my regular deep dissection of the paper, but I can refer you to the preprint, which is very much worth reading. 

The mammalian-adaptive PB2-E627K substitution preserves viral fitness of clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 HPAIV in birds.

Elizabeth Billington, Sofia Riccio, Maryn D. Brown, Benjamin Mollett, Jessica L. Quantrill, Simon Johnson, Cecilia Di Genova, Jiayun Yang, Jean-Remy Sadeyen, Audra-Lynne Schlachter, Kelly J. Roper, Jafar Hassan, Benjamin Clifton, Kajal Ralh, Caroline Janet Warren, Georgina Ward, Dilhani De Silva, Alejandro Nunez, Holly A. Coombes, Marek J Slomka, Munir Iqbal, Wendy S. Barclay, Thomas Peacock, Ashley C Banyard, Joe James
doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.06.757006
 

It isn't known what mutation - or series of mutations - would be needed to turn H5Nx into a genuine pandemic threat. What we know is 1) these viruses continue to evolve, 2) they have spread globally, and 3) in recent years they have expanded both their avian and mammalian host ranges. 

H5Nx continues to surprise, but whether that will lead to a global health crisis is anyone's guess. But just because it hasn't yet, doesn't mean it can't. 

 Which is reason enough to remain vigilant.