Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Indonesian: Two Children Suspected Of H5N1 Infection

 

 

 

# 2830

 

 

From the Bird Flu Information Corner, which over the past few months has become one of our best sources of information out of Indonesia, we get a report of two children (ages 5 and 1) hospitalized, and suspected of having the H5N1 virus.

 

No positive tests have been announced, and their condition appear to be relatively stable.   They remain, however, in isolation.

 

A big hat tip to Ida at BFIC for this translation.

 

 

Klaten, Central Java ::: Two children suspected bird flu infection

February 26, 2009

25/02/2009 17:49 Suara Merdeka

Dozen of chickens died. Two toddlers in Klaten suspected.

 

Two children, Roslik Wahyu Adiarta (5) and his/her cousin Wisnu Candra (1), residents of Dusun Kemalang, Desa Dompol, Kecamatan Kemalang, treated at RSUP Dr Soeradji hospital on Wednesday (25/2) as bird flu suspect patients. These two children are developing fever, flu, and breathing difficulty after dozen of chickens belong to the family suddenly died.

 

Patients are relatives and their houses are close to each other. Roslik was admitted to hospital on Tuesday evening (24/2) 21.00 after few days developing fever. Patient was admitted to public health center before, but the fever and breathing problem did not recover.

 

Investigation showed history of dead fowls among the neighborhood, therefore victim was redirected to RSUP for bird flu observation where Roslik is placed at isolation unit 2nd floor. Wisnu founded to develop same symptom after that and admitted to RSUP on Wednesday (25/2).

 

Wisnu’s mother, Triyanti (28) said that her child had fever and breathing problem after sudden death of 15 chickens in their village observed. Those death chickens tested bird flu infection by Agricultural Service and Livestock Subdivision.

 

The two suspects are still under observation. Blood and swab sample also have been taken for further examination. Patients also examined every 8 hours at isolation unit. Current result showed no specific bird flu infection signs such as pneumonia, acute lung inflammation or leukocyte depression.

 

Source: Indonesia local newspaper, Suara Merdeka.

Klaten, East Java

 

 

 

The Bird Flu Information Corner is a weblog developed based on collaboration work between Kobe University, Japan and Institute of Tropical Disease, Airlangga University, Indonesia in bird flu research.

Japan Runs The Numbers

 


# 2829

 

 

From the Asahi Shimbun today we get this story about a study conducted by Japan's National Institute of Infectious Diseases that looked at the interventions that would be needed in order to reduce the impact of a pandemic.

 

Out of a population of roughly 34 million (just in Tokyo), they theorize half could become infected with a novel pandemic strain if no efforts were made to reduce human contact.

 

This attack rate of 50% is almost twice what most countries have envisioned, although the UK has recently spoken about numbers in that range.  

 

The higher the attack rate, the greater of an impact a pandemic would have on society, health care providers, and the economy.  And of course, the greater the human toll as well.

 

By closing all schools, and reducing commuter traffic by 40%, they believe they can reduce the attack rate to a more manageable 25%.

 

First today's article, then a quick flashback to December 2008.

 

A hat tip to Carol@SC on the Flu Wiki for posting this story.

 

 

 

New flu could infect 17 million in Tokyo area

 

BY HISASHI HATTORI, THE ASAHI SHIMBUN

2009/2/25

 

More than half the population of the Tokyo metropolitan area could contract a new strain of influenza if nothing is done after one carrier brings the virus to the capital, according to a study.

 

The study by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases calls for all schools to close and 40 percent of commuters to stay at home to keep the infection rate at 25 percent or lower, the level the central government envisions in dealing with new strains of influenza.

 

"The key to preventing the spread of infection is the degree of measures to restrict people from going out," said Yasushi Ohkusa, a senior research scientist at the institute who took part in the study.

 

The scenario of the institute is based on data from a council on traffic planning in the Tokyo metropolitan area.

 

The council tracked down how 34 million people in Tokyo and Kanagawa, Saitama and Chiba prefectures, as well as southern Ibaraki Prefecture, move and where they are during the day.

 

The institute came up with a scenario in which a company employee is infected with a new strain of flu while overseas and returns home to Hachioji, Tokyo, on the third day of infection. The employee develops symptoms after reporting to work in Tokyo's Marunouchi district on the fourth day.

 

After a hospital diagnoses the employee with a new type of flu, local governments start taking action on the seventh day.

 

The spread of the flu will reach its peak around the 25th day, according to the scenario.

 

The study predicts that 51.6 percent of residents in the Tokyo metropolitan area will contract the flu if no measures are taken.

 

If all schools are closed and the number of commuters is reduced by 40 percent after local governments ask residents to stay home, the infection rate will fall to 19.1 percent, the study predicted.

 

The institute says that if the number of commuters is further reduced by 60 percent, the infection rate will be lowered to 9.5 percent, the same level as that of regular, seasonal influenza.(IHT/Asahi: February 25,2009)

 

 

Last December I ran a blog about a Japanese study conducted on commuter trains, to determine what carrying capacity they could maintain during a pandemic and still allow for reasonable social distancing.

 

The verdict was that they could carry only 20% of their usual traffic, which is a far cry from the 60% envisioned by today's report.  See Japan: Social Distancing Test On Commuter Trains for more details.


Here is just a snippet from one of the articles.

 

 

Flu epidemic measures tested on train riders

Kyodo News


A research institute for the transport ministry conducted a test Monday on how far apart passengers should be while riding on commuter trains in the event of a new type of influenza outbreak.

 

Safe distance: In a test of passenger control steps to be taken during a possible flu epidemic, officials from a labor ministry research institute measure the distance between mask-wearing subjects in Adachi Ward, Tokyo, on Monday. KYODO PHOTO

 

According to the Policy Research Institute for the Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Ministry, passengers would be required to keep a distance of 1 to 2 meters to prevent the infection spreading by coughs or sneezes.

 

 

Mega cities such as Tokyo or New York, where millions of people rub shoulders every day, are more likely to see high attack rates than say, Springfield, Missouri or  Keokuk, Iowa. 

 

The more close contacts a person has, the more likely they are to either contract, or pass on, the virus.  

 

Mitigation efforts, such as closing schools and limiting the number of people allowed on commuter trains, ought to reduce the transmission of the virus.  

 

They do come with a price, both socially and economically.  

 

But then, so would a 50% attack rate.

 

The logistics of deciding who gets priority for public transit, controlling the boarding onto the trains, and dealing with the economic outfall from employee absenteeism are sizable.

 

Which is why its is a good thing they are looking into the feasibility of this now, instead of waiting until a pandemic begins.

H7 Bird Flu Virus Found In Czech Poultry

 

 

# 2828

 

 

As happens from time to time, a poultry flock has been found to harbor a (presumably) LPAI (Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza) virus.  In this case, it appears to be one of the H7 variety.

 

This is not the highly pathogenic, and very dangerous, H5N1 bird flu.

 

 

 

Bird flu appears in Czech Republic

 

25 February 2009

 

Hodonin, South Moravia, Feb 24 (CTK) - Czech vets on Tuesday discovered a virus of bird flu when checking the breeding of waterfowl in the Rybarstvi Hodonin fishing company, local vet authority head Jaroslav Salava told CTK.

 

It was discovered in nine out of the 60 randomly checked geese near the Pisecensky pond. However, it is not the risky type H5N1, but the much less dangerous H7 stem, Salava said.

 

Nevertheless, vets will still order the putting down of all the roughly 3000 geese and 350 ducks, Salava said.

 

An area with the 1-km radius was created around the focus of the epidemic, Salava said, adding that special veterinary measures for the disinfection of the farms and movement of people and poultryž would be in effect there.

 

Salava said the staff and locals were not exposed to any serious danger in the area.

 

"The found H7 stem is among the low pathogenic stems of bird flu with a minimum risk. The transfer of the infection to humans can be discounted," Renata Vaverkova from the regional sanitation authority told CTK.

 

The low pathogenic stem of bird flu was recently discovered also in Germany, France, Belgium and Italy.

 

There are about 90 ponds with the acreage of 520 hectares in the Hodonin region.

 

 

Although the officials quoted in the above news article go out of their way to discount any human threat from the virus, human infections have occurred from H7, although they are usually mild. 

 

As an example, in 2003 there was an outbreak of an H7 strain among poultry in the Netherlands where 89 people were confirmed infected by the virus.  Most exhibited mild symptoms, although one person died.

 

This article from May of 2008 appeared in CIDRAP News, discusses H7's pandemic potential.

 

 

Some avian flu H7 viruses growing more human-like

 

Robert Roos * News Editor

May 28, 2008 (CIDRAP News) – Scientists have found evidence that North American avian influenza viruses of the H7 subtype are becoming more like human flu viruses in their ability to attach to host cells, which suggests they may be improving their capacity to infect humans.

 

The investigators determined that several recent North American H7 viruses have an increased ability to bind to a type of receptor molecule that is abundant on human tracheal cells and is less common in birds. Their results were published this week by the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science.

 

The finding—which comes as the deadly Eurasian H5N1 virus continues to be seen as the likeliest candidate to spark a pandemic—"underscores the necessity for continued surveillance and study of these [North American H7] viruses as they continue to resemble viruses with pandemic potential," says the report. The study was done by scientists from the US Centers for disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Emory University in Atlanta, and the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif.

 

H7 viruses have caused a number of disease outbreaks in poultry in Europe and North America in recent years, though far fewer than the widespread outbreaks caused by the H5N1 virus. H7 viruses also have occasionally infected humans, typically causing only mild conjunctivitis. But a veterinarian died of an H7N7 infection during the devastating poultry outbreaks in the Netherlands in 2003.

(Continue)

 

 

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Bloomberg Updates The Baxter Vaccine Mishap Story






PLEASE SEE March 17th Update of this story.  Some of the Original newspaper accounts had incorrect details.

A Few More Details On The Baxter Mishap

 

# 2827





In what could have been a major incident, Baxter International in Austria accidentally sent vaccine samples contaminated with the H5N1 virus to labs in In the Czech Republic, Slovenia, and Germany.

The problem was only discovered after lab ferrets began dying after receiving the vaccine (see Ferreting Out A Problem In the Laboratory).  

While early details of this case came out on February 17th, we've not heard much since then.

Jason Gale and Michelle Fay Cortez of Bloomberg news have delved deeper into this disturbing story, and bring us fresh details.  Follow the link to read the story in its entirety.



Baxter’s Vaccine Research Sent Bird Flu Across European Labs
 
 
By Michelle Fay Cortez and Jason Gale
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Researchers from Baxter International Inc. in Austria unintentionally sent samples contaminated with the bird flu virus to laboratories in the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany, raising concern about the potential spread of the deadly disease.
 
The contamination was discovered after ferrets were injected with the vaccine, according to BioTest s.r.o, a biotechnology company based in Konarovice that was working with the immunization in the Czech Republic.
 
The vaccine came from Deerfield, Illinois-based Baxter, which reported the incident to the Austrian Ministry of Health, Sigrid Rosenberger, a spokeswoman for the ministry, said in a telephone interview today. The vaccine was prepared for use in laboratories, and none of the workers exposed have fallen ill.
 
“This was infected with a bird flu virus,” Rosenberger said. “There were some people from the company who handled it. They went to the hospital and were tested and were cleared. There have been no infections.”
 
The Austrian health ministry reported the incident to the European Union and plans to conduct its own audit, she said. The vaccine has been destroyed, according to Rosenberger.
 
Chris Bona and Laura Grossmann, Baxter spokespeople, didn’t immediately return phone calls placed before business hours. Roland Bettschart, who handles media enquiries for Baxter in Vienna, said a “laboratory glitch” occurred and the company would send a formal statement soon.
 
The World Health Organization “is aware of the situation and is consulting with the ministers of health of the countries involved to ensure that all public risks arising from this event have been identified and managed appropriately,” said Gregory Hartl, a spokesman in Geneva.
 
(Continue . . .)

Study: Global Bird Flu Production Capacity

 


# 2826

 

 

I'll admit going into this entry, that I'm a bit skeptical at some of the numbers presented in the article below.   About once a year, we get one of these updated estimates of our global vaccine production capability.

 

First the article, then a bit of discussion.

 

 

 

 

Bird flu vaccine production still lags - study

 

Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:59am EST

 

GENEVA, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Drug companies have increased their capacity to make bird flu vaccines by 300 percent in the past two years but will still need four years to meet global demand in the event of a pandemic, a study said on Tuesday.

 

It also said doses of vaccine tailored to the actual strain of pandemic influenza that emerges will not be available until four months after that strain is identified.

 

"We found that considerable progress has been made to enhance the production capacity of pandemic influenza vaccine," Adam Sabow, partner at consultanting firm Oliver Wyman which conducted the study, said in a statement.

 

"While capacity still falls short of global need during a pandemic, the surplus capacity during the inter-pandemic period creates opportunities for preparedness efforts," he said.

 

Oliver Wyman carried out the study with the World Health Organisation (WHO) and International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA).

 

<snip>

 

In the most likely case, manufacturers could produce 2.5 billion doses of pandemic vaccine in the 12 months following receipt of the production strain, requiring four years to satisfy global demand, the study said.

 

In the current best-case scenario, 7.7 billion doses could be produced in the first 12 months, requiring 1.5 years to satisfy global demand, it said. Production was expected to increase significantly over the next five years.

 

 

First, let me stipulate that I've not read this study yet.  I made a quick visit to the Oliver Wyman website, but could not find it posted.  Nor could I find it on the WHO website.  Perhaps it will show up later.

 

We'll use their `most likely scenario' of a global output of 2.5 billion doses in the first year of a pandemic.    I won't quibble about supply chain issues, employee absenteeism, or other impediments to manufacturing.   

 

They may, or may not happen.  We'll assume that manufacturers are able to overcome these adversities.

 

Vaccination would require two shots per person, 30 days apart, to confer partial immunity.   So there would be enough vaccine for roughly 1.25 billion people in the first year of a pandemic.

 

The question becomes . . . can we deliver 2.5 billion doses of vaccine, in the midst of a raging pandemic, to 1.25 billion people during the first year?

 

The logistics of doing that during ongoing supply chain, transportation, and human resource crises will be horrendous. 

 

Perhaps not impossible, but very difficult.

 

Some groups, like the military, health care workers and first responders should be relatively easy to target.  They are easily scheduled, tracked, and prioritized.

 

Delivering vaccines to the general public will be more problematic.

 

Below you will find the prioritization for pandemic vaccines proposed for the United States.   Other countries will, no doubt, apply their own standards. 

 

image

(click to enlarge)

 

Four to six months into a pandemic, vaccines should begin to come off the manufacturing line.  They must then be packaged, equitably divided up, and then (through a series of steps) shipped to tens of thousands of PODS (Points of Distribution) in dozens of countries each week.  Probably in small lots.

 

These dispersal points (health departments, hospitals, local governments) must then arrange to have syringes (which may be in short supply), trained personnel (also likely to be in short supply), and security on hand.

 

In the United States alone, according to the USGS there more more than 35,000 cities, towns, or villages.  Expand that just to the 11 or so vaccine producing nations, and you are talking hundreds of thousands of locations.   

 

While there may not be vaccine PODs in every one of these locations, we are still probably talking about tens of thousands of distribution points around the world.  

 

With just a few million doses a week coming off the assembly line for each country, how does a central government decide where to send the vaccine each week?  

 

In the US, the vaccines will probably be sent to each state (on a per capita basis), but then each state must decide how to disperse it.

 

In week 26 of a pandemic, will some committee here in Florida decide that Tampa gets an allocation, but Winter Haven won't?  Jacksonville gets lucky, but St. Augustine will have to wait? 

 

Those are the kind of decisions that someone will have to make.  Public health departments, already seeing cuts in their budgets, will be put in an almost impossible situation.

 

And each POD will have to selectively administer the vaccine - not once, but twice, a month apart - to prioritized individuals.

 

Just a few of the problems these PODS will face include:

 

  • How willing will people be to stand in line, perhaps for hours, with hundreds of other people during a pandemic?   I know some localities are talking about drive-thru vaccination clinics, but that assumes everyone has access to a car and gasoline, six or twelve months into a pandemic. In place likes New York City, or New Orleans, where car ownership is low, that idea won't go very far. 

 

  • How do these PODs keep track of who has already received their first, or even second dose?   Many in the public may decide that if two doses are good, three would be better.  Will they issue cards?  What if someone loses their card?  Keeping track of who is, or isn't vaccinated, may become a big issue. 

 

  • Since pregnancy is considered a high risk factor, here in the United States pregnant women are included in the first tier of vaccinations.  Exactly how will these PODs determine if a woman is pregnant?  On site pregnancy tests?  Requiring a letter (which may be difficult to get in a pandemic) from a doctor ?

 

  • The same problem will arise when vaccinating tier 2 `essential personnel'  (pharmacists, mortuary workers, utilities workers, community services etc.).  How do you verify these people are essential?   Vaccinate at their workplaces?  If so, you've increased the number of PODs you need to staff.  Who gets inoculated first?  Pharmacists, utility workers, or `critical government' employees?   A community probably won't get enough vaccine to do everyone in the same tier at the same time.  

 

 

Well, you get the idea. 

 

Manufacturing a vaccine is just the beginning of the vaccination process.  Our ability to actually deliver a prioritized vaccine to billions of people over a short period of time has never been tested. 

 

So, while I'm happy to see that progress is being made on the manufacturing end, an awful lot of things would have to go exceedingly well - under the worst possible conditions - to get billions of people vaccinated in the first couple of years of a pandemic.

 

Something to shoot for, of course. But it may not be possible.

UN: Vietnam Needs To Renew Bird Flu Vigilance

 

# 2825

 

 

Two years ago Vietnam was looked upon as a bird flu success story.  

 

Once known as the most bird-flu affected nation on earth, Vietnam went through all of 2006 and the first half of 2007 without reporting a human case.  Even reports in poultry were rare.

 

It seemed, at least for a time, that through a combination of public education, disinfection of poultry farms, and a rigorous vaccination program that Vietnam had beaten back the virus. 

 

But starting in the summer of 2007, the virus began to show up again.  Poultry began dying, and people once again began to get infected.  Eight people in 2007 and six in 2008.  Ten of them did not survive.

 

Today, less than 60 days into 2009, Vietnam has reported two cases of H5N1 in humans, with one fatality.   At least 10 provinces are battling outbreaks.

 

Vietnam is not back to the `bad old days' of 2005 - which saw 61 human infections - but they are seen as definitely moving in the wrong direction.

 

Today the WHO and the FAO have issued an appeal to Vietnam to renew their efforts to combat the virus.

 

This report from Reuters.

 

 

 

 

Vietnam needs to renew bird flu vigilance -UN bodies

 

Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:32am EST

HANOI, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Two United Nations bodies warned that renewed vigilance was necessary to prevent the further spread of deadly bid flu in Vietnam, which has reported three new cases in as many months, with one person dying.


The H5N1 strain has infected poultry in 10 Vietnamese provinces, and at the weekend a 23-year-old woman died of the disease in the northern province of Quang Ninh.


"The animal and public health sectors need to work closely together to minimise the ever-present threats of avian influenza and other animal-based diseases passing to humans," said Andrew Speedy, Vietnam representative of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).


Jean-Marc Olive, representative of the World Health Organisation (WHO), said there was a "real possibility" of human-to-human transmission.


"If this occurs we could see the start of a new influenza pandemic," he said in a joint WHO-FAO statement.

(Continue . . .)

 

 

Meanwhile, the WHO has released their latest Avian Flu update on Vietnam. 

 

 

Avian influenza – situation in Viet Nam - update 3

 

24 February 2009 -- The Ministry of Health in Viet Nam has announced the death of a previously confirmed case of H5N1 infection. The 23 year old female from Dam Ha District, Quang Ninh Province died on 21 February.

 

Of the 109 cases confirmed to date in Viet Nam, 53 have been fatal.