# 1482
Last week, Bernard Vallat, Director of the OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health) caused a bit of a firestorm due to statements he allegedly made to reporters concerning the bird flu threat.
From the MSNBC account, Mr Vallat had these points to make:
But "the risk was overestimated," said Bernard Vallat, director general of the animal health organization, also known as the OIE.
Vallat said the H5N1 virus has proved extremely stable, despite concerns that it could mutate into a form that could spread easily among humans.
"We have never seen such a stable strain," Vallat said.
He said concerns a few years ago that a flu pandemic from H5N1 might be imminent lacked scientific proof.
"It was just nonscientific supposition," he told reporters.
In a matter of hours this story was picked up and reprinted by numerous newspapers around the world. Dozens of bloggers and pundits latched on to these statements and immediately declared the bird flu threat as either media hype, or a government plot.
A couple of examples can be found here, and here.
Well today, the OIE is backing away from these statements. They aren't exactly saying their director never said these things, but they are `clarifying' his meaning.
This appears to be a slightly reworked (and more formal) version of the statement that Crof of Crofsblog carried a couple of days ago.
Comments on recent OIE Director General statements on the avian influenza situation
Paris, January 16th 2008 - At an informal meeting with the press on 10/1/08 , the Director General of the OIE, Dr Bernard Vallat presented an overview on current and future activities of the organisation while addressing the need for global animal health strategies to control emerging and re-emerging infectious animal diseases worldwide.
In this context, the issue of highly pathogenic avian influenza and the current situation with H5N1 was raised by some of the reporters.
Dr Vallat said – as he has said in the past – that although the H5N1 virus is extremely virulent, it has shown to be quite stable over the last few years and its epidemiological behaviour remained the same from the beginning of the crisis in 2003. He added that this observed stable behaviour of the H5N1 strain of the virus does not allow ruling out the risk of a mutation into a new dangerous form for humans, thus becoming a potential candidate for an avian influenza pandemic.
Dr Vallat also said that while no one can predict when and how a human influenza pandemic will occur, this may not originate from the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 South East Asian strain which is only one of many other influenza virus strains that can eventually be responsible for a pandemic.
“Bird flu will always remain a risk, be it H5N1 or another and for that reason pandemic preparedness as well as permanent control of the pathogen at the animal source are important”, he said.
In line with the organisation’s position and that of its international partners, Dr Vallat reinforced the need to strengthen the infrastructure capable of early detection and rapid response for any emerging disease at animal level, especially those with a zoonotic potential. He regretted that such capacities were not in place at the very beginning of the H5N1 avian influenza crisis, which delayed the reaction of countries, especially the poorest ones, first hit in South East Asia . He welcomed today’s much better preparedness of countries to detect and control the disease.
Dr Vallat repeated the need to strengthen the governance of veterinary services and to improve the collaboration between disciplines, as well as between private and public sectors.
Now we wait and see if this story gets anywhere near the play that the original report got in the press.
Somehow, I doubt it.
