Wednesday, June 19, 2024

Preprint: Increase of Permissive Secondary antiviral mutations in the Evolution of A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza Virus Neuraminidases


Credit NIAID 


#18,135

Last week, in EID Journal: Multicountry Spread of Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Viruses with Reduced Oseltamivir Inhibition, May 2023–February 2024, we looked at an early report on what may be the biggest threat to our armamentarium of influenza antivirals since 2008. 

Although the numbers remain small, the trends are worrisome, as described by the authors:

Since May 2023, a novel combination of neuraminidase mutations, I223V + S247N, has been detected in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses collected in countries spanning 5 continents, mostly in Europe (67/101). The viruses belong to 2 phylogenetically distinct groups and display ≈13-fold reduced inhibition by oseltamivir while retaining normal susceptibility to other antiviral drugs.

Admittedly oseltamivir (aka Tamiflu) isn't our only antiviral option (see  FDA Approved Xofluza : A New Class Of Influenza Antiviral), but it is the most popular antiviral, and has been stockpiled by countries the most.  

While rare, spontaneous mutations (primarily H275Y) have long been observed in a small percentage (1%-2%) of people receiving oseltamivir. These mutations exacted a `fitness price', causing these viruses to transmit poorly, making them essentially dead-end infections

But in 2008 the H1N1 virus developed `permissive secondary mutations' that allowed the H1N1 virus to spread efficiently even with the H275Y mutation. Within a year, the H1N1 virus had gone from being nearly 100% susceptible to oseltamivir to 100% resistant (see CIDRAP article With H1N1 resistance, CDC changes advice on flu drugs).

The future of oseltamivir appeared bleak going into 2009, when in a Deus Ex Machina moment a new swine-origin H1N1 virus - one that happened retain its sensitivity to Tamiflu - swooped in as a pandemic strain in the spring of 2009, supplanting the older resistant H1N1 virus. 

Since then we've been looking for any signs of growing resistance to NAI inhibitors. For the most part, we've seen the same 1% incidence of spontaneous mutations in people receiving the antiviral, although we've seen a few `clusters' of cases.


Yesterday a preprint was published on bioRxiv by researchers at the Robert Koch-Institute that reports seeing an uptick in permissive secondary mutations (NA-V241I and NA-N369K) in in the NA or circulating H1N1 viruses that they believe may enable resistant strains to transmit more efficiently. 

Since the copyright on this preprint is fairly restrictive, I'll simply provide the link, and urge those interested to follow it to read the full report.

Susanne Caroline DuweJeanette MildeAlla HeiderMarianne WeddeBrunhilde SchweigerRalf Duerrwald


While the incidence of resistance in seasonal H1N1 still appears to be very low - and with luck, it may never take off - in 2008 we saw it go from near zero to nearly 100% in a matter of months. 

So we are watching these changes with considerable interest.