Tuesday, June 30, 2009

CIDRAP: Promising Practices For Pandemic Planning

 

 

# 3417

 

 

CIDRAP’s (Center For Infectious Disease Research and Policy) Promising Practices website is chock full of important information on dealing with a pandemic, and highlights programs designed to do just that from all over the country.


In the past I’ve highlighted several of their practices, including:

 
Promising Practices: Neighborhood Emergency Teams
Promising Practices: Psychological First Aid

 

But these just barely scratch the surface of the 185 practices collected on this site.  You could spend days gleaning good information off this site (and probably should).

 

Tonight CIDRAP brings us a promising practices article on a familiar theme to those who visit flu blogs, and flu forums: the need for personal and community preparedness. 

 

I’ve only printed the opening paragraphs, follow the link to read it in its entirety.

 

PROMISING PRACTICES FOR PANDEMIC PLANNING
Experts stress need for personal, community preparedness

 

Ayisha Yahya * Staff Writer

Editor's Note: CIDRAP's Promising Practices: Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Tools (www.pandemicpractices.org) online database showcases peer-reviewed practices, including useful tools to help others with their planning. This article is one of a series exploring the development of these practices. We hope that describing the process and context of these practices enhances pandemic planning.

Jun 30, 2009 (CIDRAP News) – If you don't have an emergency preparedness plan for yourself, your family, and even your community, now is a good time to make one. That's the message public health officials are sending as cases of the novel H1N1 influenza virus continue to rise nationally and globally.

 

"If you don't have a plan, you need one now," said Roger Pollok, special projects manager for Emergency Preparedness at the San Antonio Metropolitan Health District in Texas. "The stakes are a little different now."

 

The World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared the current outbreak a pandemic on Jun 11. "We are in the earliest days of the pandemic," said WHO Director-General Margaret Chan that day in a statement to the press. "The virus is spreading under a close and careful watch."

 

Health experts say there is no way to predict what is still in store, but they have concerns that the coming fall flu season might bring a second wave of illnesses, potentially more severe.

 

(Continue . . .)

Branswell On The Adjuvant Controversy

 

# 3416

 

 

Memories of the Swine Flu vaccine debacle of 1976 run pretty deep among public health officials, and politicians, here in the United States.  Even those who are too young to actually have been a part of that event have certainly heard the cautionary tales.

 

For reasons still unexplained, a significant number of adverse side effects cropped up among people taking the vaccine.  Most notably, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), which causes a form of paralysis.

 

When the anticipated pandemic failed to arrive, officials were left with more dead and damaged people from the vaccine than from the swine flu.  

 

The lawsuits that followed, along with the political outfall, are well remembered to this day.   (For more information, see  Deja Flu, All Over Again)

 

All of this makes public health officials just a wee bit nervous when they contemplate another massive pandemic immunization drive.  Vaccine technology is better and more reliable today, of course, and so a repeat of 1976 isn’t considered likely.  

 

But that assumes we don’t do something different with this pandemic vaccine – like add an adjuvant. 

 

Adjuvants are chemicals that are added to vaccines to increase the recipient’s immune response, and can lower the amount of antigen needed in a vaccine.    In Europe, adjuvants have been approved for some vaccines given to those over 65 for years.

 

For a world facing a major pandemic vaccine shortage, adjuvants are an attractive option.   But not everyone is sold on the use of adjuvants, particularly for children and teenagers.

 

Helen Branswell picks up the story over this debate.  Follow the link to read it in its entirety.

 

 

Canada-U.S. may go different routes on pandemic vaccine production

 

By: Helen Branswell, THE CANADIAN PRESS

30/06/2009 2:50 PM | Comments: 0

 

TORONTO - Canada and the United States may go separate ways when deciding whether powerful boosting compounds called adjuvants should be added to swine flu vaccines, experts suggest.

 

Canada will likely use adjuvanted swine flu vaccine, says Dr. David Butler-Jones, head of the Public Health Agency of Canada.

 

But it is not a slam-dunk that regulatory authorities south of the border will clear adjuvanted flu vaccines for a U.S. mass vaccination campaign - if one takes place - this fall, some American experts say.

 

"The risk-benefit of using an adjuvant in a population in which you don't have a lot of data, i.e. younger people . . . has to be balanced against ... what's going on," says Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

 

"What's going on in our summer here? In the Southern Hemisphere's winter there? All of those things are going to be playing into the decision of what you're going to use or not use."

 

Ultimately decisions on whether to license pandemic vaccines with adjuvants will be the job of each country's regulatory agency - Health Canada here and the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S.

 

They and sister agencies elsewhere will face tough decisions in the weeks ahead, decisions that will likely have to be made with less data than such bodies typically require for the licensure of new vaccines or drugs.

 

(Continue . . . )

A Rather Long Referral

 

 

# 3415

 

 

I am, admittedly, a social media failure.  It probably has to do with my age (I’m 55).

 

Oh, I have (and use) a twitter account (Fla_Medic), I’ve a badly neglected Facebook presence (who has time? I don’t), and I use Skype and email to chat and talk to a number of people around the world every day.  

 

I guess that puts me ahead of a small number of people living in yurts in Outer Mongolia, but its a far cry from being on the bleeding edge of technology like I was during the 1980s and 1990s when I was a computer consultant/programmer.

 

It always seemed extraordinarily unfair that I could learn and become reasonably proficient in a dozen computer programming languages over the years, only to see them obsolete about the time I got the hang of using them. 

 

Perhaps if I were a quicker study . . . but I digress . . .


I was dragged kicking and screaming into twitter back in January (see Life Is Tweet), and at the time, had no idea whether I would stick with it. 

 

It has proven, however, to be a useful tool for me, and I see more and more possibilities with each passing day.   

 

I get breaking news from a variety of sources like the HHS (@BirdFluGov) and the CDC (@CDCFlu), along with updates from CIDRAP (@CIDRAP), and AIDigest (@AIDigest).  

 

I’m also in the pipeline to receive tidbits, notes, and updates from fellow bloggers and reporters.  I often get inspirations for my next blog from the twitter stream running in a box along the side of my browser (I use TwitterFox).

 

I follow about 90 people and agencies.

 

And of course, I send out tweets (short messages) to alert people who follow me when I’ve posted a new blog, when I spot someone else’s blog they might find of interest, or simply a `retweet of someone else’s message that I feel should be propagated.

 

And that’s the power of twitter. 

 

When I send out a Tweet, fewer than 300 people get it in their feed.  But many of them have hundreds, or even thousands, of people who follow them.   If they `retweet’ my message, suddenly it gets a much larger audience.

 

In terms of instant messaging, and getting an alert out out to a lot of people, Twitter has a lot going for it.   Sure, there’s plenty of bogus information on Twitter. As I pointed out last April - It Depends Who You Follow.  

 

If you follow idiots, you’ll get idiotic information.

 

Which just about tells you everything I know about Twitter.

 

Luckily, there are people with a greater understanding of the potential of these new social media than have I.  

 

One of these visionary types – named Chris - emailed me today, and asked if I would take a look at blog he wrote on the potential epidemiological uses of Twitter.   

 

I’ve read it, and thought some of my readers would want to read it as well.

 

As Chris (who normally blogs about electronic medical records) points out, there already are crude attempts to synthesize the data coming over Twitter and from search engines like Google, to try to identify and quantify infectious disease trends.   Over time, these efforts may prove invaluable in tracking diseases.

 

That said, here is the link to the article.

 

Twitter: Growing Virally But Can It Stop Viruses?

 

Whether any of this is practical (many doctors are notoriously computer phobic),it’s an interesting idea, and food for thought.

 

A month ago, I doubt that anyone would have suspected the role that Twitter would play in the aftermath of the Iranian election.  

 

And of course, Twitter is being utilized by hundreds of state and federal agencies, as well.

 

Yes, I see a lot of obstacles to using twitter in this fashion.  Perhaps there will be too much `noise’ on to filter out, or too little participation.  Maybe it isn’t practical.  

 

Or maybe this turns out to be the next `big thing’

 

I don’t pretend to know.  After all, a year ago, I’d have sworn that I’d never have any use for Twitter.

 

I’m just glad there are people out there from a lot of different backgrounds thinking, and experimenting, and trying to come up with new ways to use today’s technology to help identify, and stop emerging diseases.

 

It’s a worthy goal.

Those At Greatest Risk Urged To Skip Hajj This Year

 


# 3414

 

While it is too soon to gauge eventual toll this H1N1 pandemic will have on the global economy, we are already seeing signs of economic impact.

 

Airline travel is down, the cruise industry is taking it on the chin, some summer camps are being canceled, and today public health experts are urging those at greatest risk – the elderly, kids, and pregnant women – not to make the journey to Mecca this year for the hajj.

 

Each year several million Muslims make the journey to the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, in the 12th month of the Islamic (lunar) calendar.  That generally falls in late November or December.

 

This report from the AP.

 

 

Elderly, kids urged to skip hajj over swine flu

By DONNA ABU-NASR, Associated Press Writer Donna Abu-nasr, Associated Press Writer

 

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – Children, pregnant women, the elderly and those with chronic diseases should stay away from the annual hajj pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia to prevent catching swine flu, health experts recommended Tuesday.

 

The recommendations come as some in the Muslim world have raised questions about the risk posed by swine flu to the millions attending the annual Muslim pilgrimage, which takes place this year in December, with some even suggesting quarantining people returning from Saudi Arabia.

 

The Saudi kingdom invited experts from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and others to a four-day meeting in the western seaport city of Jiddah to examine Saudi measures to prevent the spread of swine flu during the Muslim pilgrimage.

 

In a statement at the conclusion of the conference, Health Minister Abdullah al-Rabeeah said the kingdom invited the experts because "of concerns about the ongoing pandemic and the potential for transmission (of viruses) in the crowded setting of the hajj."

(Continue . . . )

 

 

One can’t help but wonder what this pandemic portends for next year’s Lunar New Year, which falls in mid-February.

 

In many Asian cultures it is a long held tradition that people return home to attend a reunion dinner with their families on the eve of the lunar New Year.  

 

This results in the largest migration of humans on the planet, involving hundreds of millions of people each year. 

 

Factories and businesses all across Asia shut down for a week, sometimes longer, just to accommodate this greatest of all Asian holidays.

 

And of course, here in North America, we see an exodus of millions of people from the colder climes each fall, who head south to Florida or Arizona, or one of the warmer states for the winter.  

 

Many of these states, and businesses, depend heavily on this yearly influx of tourists.  

 

Should a pandemic cut into that sector of the economy, a great many industries will suffer.   Airlines, hotels, restaurants, theme parks . . . . 

 

Where I live, the population quadruples every winter with the arrival of the snowbirds.  If they fail to show, many businesses would not last the season.

 

Not a prediction of course, since we don’t know what the fall will bring. 

 

But definitely a concern.

Canada: Warning To Pregnant Women On Swine Flu

 

 

# 3413

 

 

This is something we’ve discussed before, the additional risk factors that pregnancy can present with influenza.   Already we’ve seen a number of deaths, of both mothers and the child they were carrying, from the H1N1 virus.


Today we get a stark warning from the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada, urging pregnant women to avoid crowds where they might be exposed to the flu virus.

 

This from the  Canwest News Service.

 

 

Chief health officer warns pregnant women of flu risk

By Sharon Kirkey, Canwest News ServiceJune 30, 2009 10:31 AM

Pregnant women and those with underlying risk conditions, such as chronic heart or lung disease, should avoid crowds to reduce the risk of being exposed to human swine flu, federal health officials said Monday.

 

Canada's chief public health officer says there is no evidence to suggest pregnant women are at greater risk of contracting the H1N1 influenza A virus. But, if they do become ill, pregnant women — especially those in the third trimester — are at higher risk of serious complications.

 

As women get closer to their due dates, their immune systems change, making them more vulnerable to serious illness — not just from influenza, but from other infections as well, Dr. David Butler-Jones said. That can put stress on the fetus, and, in rare cases, increase the risk of an early birth or fetal death.

 

"It is very important for pregnant women to take precautions to help prevent infection in the first place and to seek medical advice if they do develop influenza-like illness," he said in a media call Monday.

 

"People with underlying risk conditions and pregnant women should consider avoiding crowds to reduce the risk of exposure to the virus," he added.

 

"You need to be practical about getting on with life," Butler-Jones said. But he said pregnant women should avoid situations where they would be close to crowds for prolonged periods.

(Continue . . . )

 

 

Dr. David Butler-Jones goes on to discuss the small, but growing number of serious cases they are seeing in Canada, and the need to stress hygiene and prevention.

 

"The message of prevention is critical, at school, camp, daycare, home or at work," Butler-Jones said. "That means washing hands, coughing or sneezing into your arm and avoiding others when we're ill. Not just today, not just for this outbreak, but always."

 

One has to wonder, given the warnings we’ve now seen from the CDC, and now Canadian Public Health Officials, how many hospitals, schools, and day care centers have advised their pregnant employees of the risks of exposure and have offered alternative work to them?

 

My concern is, for far too many institutions, the policy right now is `don’t ask, don’t tell’

Referral: Scott McPherson’s `The Worst Is Yet To Come’

 

 

# 3412

 

Scott McPherson, IT specialist, self professed flu-geek, and blogger weighs in this morning with a no-punches-pulled commentary on his views of the likely impact of the H1N1 pandemic to date, and in the future.

 

From the title, you know this isn’t going to be a Pollyanna review.

 

He explores in detail the notion that we aren’t counting every swine flu-related death – something that has been mentioned in this blog on occasion as well.   Along the way he also pitches some disturbing numbers our way as to how many victims this pandemic could end up claiming.

 

Scott, who has a day job and therefore doesn’t blog as much as his fans would like, is always worth reading.

 

Swine H1N1 influenza: The worst is yet to come

A Wide Spectrum Of Illness

 

 

# 3411

 

 

 

From almost the beginning of this novel H1N1 outbreak we’ve been warned by doctors to expect a wide spectrum of illness.  Some people may become infected and show no symptoms at all (asymptomatic), while others may experience nothing worse than they’d normally see with seasonal flu.

 

Some people, we were warned, would see more severe illness.  Particularly those with conditions that predisposed them to complications from influenza; asthma, diabetes, pregnancy, COPD, etc.

 

And for the most part, that’s the pattern we’ve been seeing.  The vast majority of cases are either asymptomatic, mild, or no worse than `seasonal flu’. 

 

Out of the millions of likely infections, most people are recovering.

 

But for thousands of people, the course of this illness has been anything but `mild’.   Here in the United States, more than 3,000 people – mostly young adults and children – have been hospitalized. Most had pre-existing medical conditions, but not all.

 

And regrettably, we’ve seen deaths too. 

 

Not a lot by pandemic standards, perhaps. But that doesn’t diminish the tragedy of each loss.  

 

Yesterday, we learned some of the details of the clinical courses (and some autopsies) from early severe cases out of Mexico.   Maryn McKenna of CIDRAP reported:

 

The 18 patients were evenly divided by gender but ranged widely in age, from 9 months to 61 years, with a median age of 38. They were all at least moderately ill, with fever of at least 38°C (100.4°F), cough, and difficulty breathing; 4 of the 5 children had diarrhea.

 

Most had bloodwork findings that indicated acute viral infections, inflammation and cardiac distress. Half had low blood pressure that persisted after emergency treatment, and 10 of the 18 needed to be put on ventilators within 24 hours of arrival at the hospital.

 

<snip>

 

The patients had a difficult course, with renal failure in 1 survivor and 5 of the deceased and multi-organ failure in all 7 of the dead. Pathological examination of the lungs of one of the dead patients showed severe damage to lung tissue, but, with no bacterial infection evident, the researchers ascribed it to the primary viral pneumonia caused by the new flu. No evidence was found of co-infection with any other virus.

 

While only a small subset of the total number of infections, the course of severe illness described above is a bit remarkable given that no evidence of secondary bacterial infection was found.

 

This presentation – low blood pressure refractory to treatment and the rapid need for ventilator support – is almost classic for sepsis (severe bacterial infection).

 

So the lack of any evidence of bacterial pneumonia in these cases is both surprising and  puzzling.

 

And via Crofsblog last night, in Canada: Severe H1N1 cases worry officials we get an excerpt from the Canadian Medicine blog: Recent severe cases of H1N1 flu worry health officials

 

(Slightly reformatted for readability – highlights mine)

 

Dr David Butler-Jones, the government's Chief Public Health Officer (above right), said that although the vast majority of the 7,775 cases detected in Canada so far (see the map below for a breakdown by province or visit the Public Health Agency's surveillance website) have been mild and have resulted in full recoveries, the anticipated "second wave" of infections this fall has been preceded already by the mysterious appearance in recent weeks of a small number of "severe" infections.



According to Dr Butler-Jones, the reason or reasons for the emergence of this new set of "severe" cases in Canada has not been determined, though epidemiologists with Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada have been dispatched to study the matter.

 

Possible explanations, he explained, could include: genetic variations that result in either too little or too great an immune response in infected patients, a mutation in the H1N1 virus (which would augur potentially very serious consequences in the general population over the months to come, it would seem), or some combination of factors.

 

He warned that we should expect to see more cases in Canada over the coming months, including more severe cases, and more deaths.

 

All of this pretty much matches the sparse reports we’ve been getting out of Argentina, where hospitals reportedly are being inundated with flu cases, and ICU’s are caring for scores of severe cases.

 


The take-away message here isn’t that the virus has mutated, or that the H1N1 virus is a stone cold killer. 

 

It’s that even a `relatively mild’ virus can have disastrous consequences for some small percentage of its victims.  That while those with pre-existing conditions may be at greater risk, perfectly healthy people are not always guaranteed a good outcome.

 

That we shouldn’t trivialize this virus.

 

Which means that we all need to continue to practice good flu hygiene; cover our coughs and sneezes, wash our hands frequently (or use alcohol sanitizer), and stay home when we are sick.

 

And the rapidly fulminating nature of this illness in some of its victims means we need to watch for serious complications in ourselves, and our loved ones, and to seek medical attention quickly if required.

 

The CDC recommends that people seek medical attention if someone:

  • has difficulty breathing or chest pain
  • has purple or blue discoloration of the lips
  • is vomiting and unable to keep liquids down
  • has signs of dehydration such as dizziness when standing, absence of urination, or in infants, a lack of tears when they cry
  • has seizures (for example, uncontrolled convulsions)
  • is less responsive than normal or becomes confused

 

Additionally, anyone with pre-existing conditions such as asthma, COPD, diabetes, pregnant women, or those with other serious underlying conditions who believe they are coming down with this flu ought to contact their doctor.

 

People who live alone could easily become overwhelmed by this illness and be unable to care for themselves, or even know when they needed to call for medical help.

 

All of this highlights the need for everyone to have, or become, a `flu buddy’ to a friend, neighbor, or relative (see Pandemic Solutions: Flu Buddies).

 

The eventual course of this pandemic remains uncertain, although there is little doubt about it presenting serious challenges.

 

It could remain `mild’; and by `mild, we mean it may only kill a million people or so around the world – or it could pick up virulence, and exact a  much heavier toll.  


We’ll know how all of this turns out in three to five years.  

 

Until then, the smart money is on getting our families, our businesses, and our communities prepared to deal with whatever hand this pandemic deals us. 

 

For more information on preparedness, you can go to any of these reputable sites.

 

FEMA http://www.fema.gov/index.shtm

READY.GOV http://www.ready.gov/

AMERICAN RED CROSS http://www.redcross.org/

For Pandemic Preparedness Information: HHS Individual Planning Page

For more in-depth emergency preparedness information I can think of no better resource than  GetPandemicReady.Org.   

 

You can also help by volunteering with the American Red Cross, The Medical Reserve Corps, CERT, or your Neighborhood watch. 

Monday, June 29, 2009

CIDRAP: NEJM Articles On The Pathogenesis and Distribution Of H1N1 in Mexico

 

# 3410

 

 

Maryn McKenna, writing tonight for CIDRAP (Center For Infectious Disease Research And Policy) News, brings us an overview of two NEJM (New England Journal of Medicine) articles  published today on the the H1N1 pandemic virus.


We’ve been waiting for clinical details to emerge, particularly regarding patients with bad outcomes or severe symptoms.  What we learn today reinforces information we’ve only gotten in drips and drabs:

 

That while most people recover without incident, the H1N1 virus can cause serious respiratory illness and multi-organ failure in some patients – even those without previously existing medical conditions.

 

Here are the opening paragraphs to Maryn’s article.  Follow the links to read it in it's entirety.

 

 

Novel H1N1 flu can cause severe respiratory illness

Maryn McKenna * Contributing Writer

Jun 29, 2009 (CIDRAP News) – Novel H1N1 influenza can cause severe respiratory illness, profound lung damage, and death even in patients with no underlying conditions to make them vulnerable, a team of physicians from Mexico report in a rush article published online today by the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

 

The analysis of 18 patients hospitalized with H1N1 (swine) flu at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (INER) in Mexico during the pandemic's earliest days reveals that fewer than half had underlying medical conditions, but more than half needed mechanical ventilation within a day of admission. Seven of the 18 died.

 

In a companion article, also published in advance online today, a multi-national team from Mexico and the United States document the age distribution of the first month of the H1N1 pandemic in Mexico, where the disease appears to have struck first, and confirm its unusual pattern of severe pneumonia among younger patients. Matching the pattern to those of earlier pandemics, the team speculates on the "biologic plausibility of partial protection" in older people exposed to mid-20th century strains of seasonal flu.

 

(Continue . . .)

 

Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S et al. Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med 2009 (published online Jun 29) [Full text]

Chowell D, Bertozzi S, Arantxa Colchero M et al. Severe respiratory disease concurrent with the circulation of H1N1 influenza. N Engl J Med 2009 (published online Jun 29) [Full text]

 

 

In a separate article, Lisa Schnirring of CIDRAP brings us a look at two more NEJM articles on the evolutionary path that the H1N1 virus has taken since it first appeared in 1918.

 

Experts look for clues in 1918 pandemic virus family tree

Lisa Schnirring * Staff Writer

Jun 29, 2009 (CIDRAP News) – To outside observers, the novel H1N1 virus spreading quickly to every corner of the globe must seem like it came out of nowhere, but the organism is a fourth generation of the 1918 pandemic virus and comes from an H1N1 family tree that is colorful and complex, according to two historical reviews that appear today in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

 

Understanding the history of swine influenza viruses, particularly their contribution to the 1918 pandemic virus, underscores the need to better comprehend zoonotic viruses as well as the dynamics of human pandemic viruses that can arise from them, the authors report in an early online NEJM edition.

 

The world is still in a "pandemic era" that began in 1918, wrote three experts from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), senior investigator David Morens, MD, medical epidemiologist Jeffery Taubenberger, MD, PhD, and NIAID director Anthony Fauci, MD.

(Continue . . .)

 

 

Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS. The persistent legacy of the 1918 influenza virus. N Engl J Med 2009 Jul 16;361(3):225-29 [Full text]

 

Zimmer SM, Burke DS. Historical perspective—emergence of influenza A (H1N1) viruses. N Engl J Med 2009 Jul 16;361(3):279-85 [Full text]

When Flu Strains Collide

 

 

 

# 3409

 

When two different flu viruses infect the same host at the same time – and both viruses infect the same cell simultaneously – they can swap genetic material and create a new `offspring’ virus.


This is what is known as reassortment, and it is how new strains of influenza often are created.     The novel H1N1 virus that has created our pandemic is a product of multiple reassortments. 

 

The concern that many scientists have is that at some point the highly contagiousbut  relatively mild - H1N1 virus will meet up with the hard to transmit but very deadlyH5N1 bird flu and generate a reassortment.  

 

Of course, you could get lucky and end up with a virus that is both mild and hard to transmit . . . but that isn’t the only possibility. 

 

Today we get a report on these concerns, particularly out of Indonesia, where the bird flu fatality rate is the highest of anywhere in the world.

 

Comments included are from Dr. C.A. Nidom, no stranger to readers of this blog, who is head of the Avian Influenza lab at Airlangga University in Surabaya and Indonesian Health Minister Supari.

 

Could swine flu mix with bird flu to create even deadlier strain?

Reuters

Monday, June 29th 2009, 1:48 PM

Tumbelaka/Getty

A hospital staff locks the gate at Sanglah hospital in Denpasar, Bali. Recent cases of H1N1 flu have raised concerns in Asian countries where H5N1 flu, or avian flu, is already entrenched.

What happens when flus collide?

 

Indonesia’s first cases of the new H1N1 flu, known as swine flu, have raised concerns that if the virus spreads it could combine with the entrenched and deadly H5N1 avian influenza to create a more lethal strain of flu.

 

Indonesian Health Minister Siti Fadillah Supari, who confirmed six new H1N1 cases on Sunday, said she was concerned about H1N1, widely known as swine flu, "marrying" with H5N1 avian flu.

 

Influenza viruses not only mutate quickly and unpredictably, but they can swap genes,especially if a person or animal becomes infected with two strains at once. The new H1N1 strain is itself a mixture of various strains, genetic tests show.

 

Even if this worst-case scenario did not occur, experts say populous, developing countries such as Indonesia, India or Egypt, where healthcare systems can be rudimentary, will suffer more deaths from the new virus.

 

(Continue . . .)

 

 

image

 

This graphic from the FAO shows how two different avian viruses (H10N7 and H7N3) can meet up in a cell and produce a new virus, in this case H7N7.

 

Any host capable of catching both parent influenzas can become an incubator, or mixing vessel, for a reassortment.   Pigs are thought to be particularly good hosts for this sort of mix and matching, although birds, humans, and other mammals are also potential vessels.

 

Pigs can catch human, avian, and swine influenzas.

 

How likely any of this is to happen is unknown.  

 

We know it does happen, from time to time, because we can clearly see the results.  But it obviously doesn’t happen often. 

 

Otherwise we’d be neck deep in new viruses all the time.

 

The H5N1 virus has most certainly had opportunities to reassort with seasonal H1N1, along with other flu viruses,  and to our knowledge, it hasn’t yet.  

 

That doesn’t mean it can’t or it won’t, but it does suggest there are a lot of factors at play here . . . many of which we don’t completely understand.

 

That said, reassortment is a legitimate concern, and something that scientists are constantly on the lookout for.

Media Report: Argentine Health Minister Quits

 

 


# 3408

 

 

It’s almost never a good sign when the top medical official of a country quits in the middle of an epidemic outbreak.  


For several days there have been charges levied in the Argentine press that the situation with the H1N1 swine flu was more serious than was being reported, and that attempts to declare a  health emergency were being thwarted due to political concerns.

 

This report from Reuters.

 

 

Argentine health minister quits as flu spreads

Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:09pm EDT

BUENOS AIRES, June 29 (Reuters) - Argentine Health Minister Graciela Ocana resigned on Monday amid an outbreak of the deadly H1N1 flu strain that has killed 26 people in the country, several television stations reported.


Speculation had grown in recent weeks that Ocana was unhappy in the job and it was widely reported in Argentine media that other cabinet ministers had blocked her measures to combat the current outbreak of H1N1 flu and a previous dengue outbreak. (Reporting by Helen Popper)

Tamiflu Resistant Strain Of Novel H1N1 Detected In Denmark

 

 

# 3407

 

 

One of our concerns has been with the novel H1N1 virus is, that like its seasonal flu cousin, it could pick up resistance to oseltamivir (Tamiflu).  

 

Seasonal H1N1 went from almost 100% sensitive to the drug, to nearly 100% resistant, in a little over a year. 

 

Tamiflu is currently one of just two antiviral drugs in our arsenal that work against this pandemic virus.  Losing it, and having to rely on Relenza (zanamirvir) alone, would constitute a major problem.

 

Not only are our stockpiles of Relenza much smaller, it is an inhaled powder, that is difficult for many people in respiratory difficulties to take.  

 

A couple of hours ago Dutchy on Flutrackers posted a Danish news article, translated to English, with this cryptic story.

 

caution - google translated

Dane resistant to Tamiflu
29. June 2009
The first case in the world of resistance to influenza drug Tamiflu in people with influenza H1N1 has been found in Denmark.


The person is now healthy, and there is no further evidence of infection with resistant virus, according to Statens Serum Institut.

 

In the ensuing two hours we’ve received several confirmations of this report, including this Reuter’s Report.

 

Roche finds 1st case of H1N1 resistance to Tamiflu
Mon Jun 29, 2009
.
(Adds details)


ZURICH, June 29 (Reuters) - A patient with H1N1 influenza in Denmark showed resistance to Roche Holding AG's (ROG.VX) Tamiflu, the main antiviral flu drug, a company executive said on Monday.

 

"While receiving the drug, the patient appeared to develop resistance to it," David Reddy, Roche's pandemic taskforce leader, told reporters on a conference call on the Danish case. "This is the first report we have of it in H1N1."

 

The World Health Organisation has raised its pandemic flu alert on the H1N1 flu virus to phase 6 on a six-point scale, indicating the first influenza pandemic since 1968 is under way.

 

Common seasonal flu can resist Tamiflu and Reddy said a case of resistance in H1N1 was not unexpected, adding Roche has been working on strategies to counter such a development.

 

While the discovery of one case of Tamiflu resistance is worrisome (although hardly unexpected), it doesn’t mean that Tamiflu is no longer an effective treatment for this pandemic virus.   

 

For now at least, in the vast majority of cases, Tamiflu appears to remain effective in reducing the severity of novel H1N1 symptoms (it isn’t a cure).

 

This is, however, a not-too-subtle reminder of how quickly an influenza virus can change. 

 

Scientists will be watching closely to see if additional cases of resistance begin to show up. 

 

For now though, this appears to be an isolated case.

No Longer An Academic Exercise

 

 

# 3406

 

 

While it may be hard to believe, we are just over 90 days away from the 1st of October - which in the northern hemisphere -traditionally marks the beginning of our `flu season’.

 

With a pandemic virus in the mix this year, few scientists think this will be a `normal’ flu year.  

 

Which means that as a society, we have just over 3 months to prepare for what may be a serious event.  And that assumes we don’t get slammed early, like we did in 1918.

 

 

Make no mistake. This is not a drill.  

 

 

Regardless of what you may have heard about this pandemic being `mild’, or a `non-event’, it is likely to have a significant impact over the next year or two.  

 

No one knows, with certainty, what will happen of course. 

 

There are open questions regarding the virulence of this virus, and what that is today could very well change over time.   But it doesn’t take a high mortality virus to inflict heavy damage on a society or its economy.

 

Most experts - looking at the continued spread of swine flu well into summer here in the northern hemisphere, along with the impact that countries south of the equator are seeing – expect that considerable challenges lie ahead.

 

Pandemic viruses – by definition – are viruses to which most people have little or no immunity.   So we can probably expect a lot of people to get sick this fall.  

 

How many?    Again, only estimates are available. 

 

But authorities are expecting somewhere around 1/3rd of the population to contract the virus. That’s 100 million people in America alone.  

 

Or if you prefer, more than 2 billion people worldwide.

 

Triple the number of people normally sickened each year by influenza. And unlike the seasonal influenzas we normally see, this virus appears to favor young adults and children over the elderly.

 

And that could have serious ripple effects throughout our society, and our economy.

 

While many of the effects of this pandemic won’t become obvious until we are in the midst of it, one of the easier predictions is that we will be forced to deal with a higher rate of absenteeism from the workplace than normal.

 

There is virtually no doubt that health authorities will urge everyone with `flu-like’ symptoms to stay home for at least 7 days.  

 

Not everyone with these symptoms will have the pandemic virus, of course.   There are other respiratory ailments such as Parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus, metapneumovirus, influenza B, and adenovirus that will probably also circulate this winter.

 

So the number of people who `think’ they have the virus may be higher than 1/3rd of the population. 

 

And to this sizeable group, you have to add an unknown number of people who will have to stay home to care for a sick child, spouse,  parent, or friend.   

 

There will be others who will have to stay home to care for their children if schools and day care centers are closed.  

 

And of course, there may be some people are are simply too afraid of the virus to come to work.  That number will depend, no doubt, on the eventual virulence of the virus.

 

The impact on the workforce could be sizable. During the peak of the flu season, some companies could see 30% or more of their employees out due to the pandemic. 

 

Some businesses may be forced to close their doors temporarily.  Other companies may lose customers and market share to companies that were better prepared to deal with a pandemic.

 

And some businesses may never recover.

 

 

Which is why it is imperative that every business begin to prepare now for this fall.   This is no longer an academic exercise

 

If you are a business owner or manager, and you don’t already have a solid, well rehearsed, and workable pandemic plan in place . . . well, the clock is ticking.  

 

And with 90 days till October, time is short.

 

If you haven’t done so already, you need to appoint a CPO – or Chief Pandemic Officer – for your company. 

 

That can be you, or someone you trust, but it must be someone who has the time to devote – and the authority to make things happen – that will be needed to get the job done.

 

Each business is different, and so there is no off-the-rack pandemic plan that will fit your needs.  Your CPO, with the help of managers, and employees, will have to craft something suitable for your business.

 

You don't have to be an expert in pandemics, or pandemic planning to get started.  There are plenty of resources available on the Internet.  Just Google  Business Continuity Pandemic, and you'll have a month's worth of reading at your fingertip.

 

But to get started, go to www.pandemicflu.gov , and visit the Individual planning page for preparing your family, and the Workplace planning page for businesses.

 

Here you will find `toolkits', basically checklists, for starting your pandemic plan.  While you will have to modify these toolkits to fit your situation, they provide an excellent starting point.

 

Another essential read is the CDC's Community Strategy for Pandemic Influenza Mitigation (PDF - 10.3 MB) guidelines on actions, designed primarily to reduce contact between people, that community government and health officials can take to try to limit the spread of infection should a pandemic flu develop.

 

Appendix 4 contains information for businesses and other employers.

 

 

Two other essential resources, specifically geared for business owners, are these guides from OSHA.

  • Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for an Influenza Pandemic  (PDF - 313 KB) (Occupational Safety & Health Administration)

    Provides guidance and recommendations on infection control in the workplace, including information on engineering controls, work practices, and personal protective equipment, such as respirators and surgical masks.

  • Guidance for Protecting Workers Against Avian Flu (Occupational Safety and Health Administration)

  •  

    You’ll find more at OSHA’s Worker Safety and Health Guidance for H1N1 Flu.

     

    These documents should get you started. 

     

    A pandemic is not a short-term crisis.  It could drag on through the entire fall and winter, never quite go away next summer, and return with a vengeance next fall.   

     

    We simply don’t know how long it will last.

     

    In what is already a difficult economic environment, failing to deal decisively and effectively with this pandemic threat could prove fatal to a large number of businesses.   

     

    The good news is, there is still some time to prepare.   The bad news is, I don’t think many are listening.

    Reminder: Gregory Härtl Radio Interview Today

     

     

    # 3405

     

     

    Today,  June 29th at 4pm and again at 6pm EDTRadio Sandy Springs will broadcast a 1 hour interview with WHO spokesman Gregory Härtl on the H1N1 `swine flu’ pandemic.

     

    The interview, conducted earlier this week by Sharon Sanders of FluTrackers, is the latest in a series of high profile interviews on The Infectious Disease Show that may be heard online on Radio Sandy Springs.

     

    Theses shows are archived, and you can listen to, or download earlier broadcasts in MP3 format.

    • An earlier interview with Dr. Fedson, conducted on April 6th, may be heard here.

    If you miss the live broadcast on the web, the archive is usually posted within 48 hours.

    Sunday, June 28, 2009

    Experts: `Mild’ Is A Misleading Term For This Pandemic

     


    # 3404

     

     

    Helen Branswell brings us a terrific article today on the concerns of experts over the use of the word `mild’ to describe the H1N1 swine flu virus.   


    It’s been a recurring theme in this blog that the use of that term may come back to haunt officials this fall, when it comes time to convince people of the need to protect themselves with a vaccine.

     

    It also results in editorials, like the one I highlighted earlier this week (see Risky Communications), that blatantly misrepresent the threat. 

     

    Helen Branswell brings us the thoughts of Risk Communications expert Peter Sandman – whom I’ve featured many times in this blog (including here, here, here, and here), along with Dr. Keiji Fukuda, the World Health Organization's top flu expert, and Dr. Michael Osterholm, Director of CIDRAP.

     

    A better lineup of experts you aren’t going to find.

     

    As always, follow the link to read the article in its entirety. 

     

     

    Constant use of 'mild' to describe swine flu misleading people about threat

    Provided by: Canadian Press
    Written by: Helen Branswell, THE CANADIAN PRESS
    Jun. 28, 2009

    TORONTO - Officialdom's mantra about swine flu - "it is overwhelmingly mild" - might seem incongruous if we knew the number of children, teens and young adults in ICU beds right now alive only because a breathing machine has taken over for their ravaged lungs.

     

    The heavy reliance on the word "mild " could be creating a false impression of what is actually going on and what the world may face in coming months, some experts worry.

     

    Peter Sandman, a risk communications guru from Princeton, N.J., suggests if authorities are trying to ensure people don't panic about the new H1N1 outbreak, they are concerned about the wrong thing.

     

    "In North America, swine flu panic is much rarer than swine flu deaths," Sandman says.

     

    "The problem isn't panic or even excessive anxiety. The problem is complacency, both about what's going to happen and about what might happen."

    (Continue . . .)

    Some Thoughts 60 Days Into The Outbreak

     

     

    # 3403

     

     

    It’s now been just over two months since the H1N1 virus first leapt into the headlines, and nearly 380 blogs later, I’m the first to admit that I don’t know where this H1N1 pandemic is going to lead us.  

     

    So far, this virus seems to be relatively `mild’ for the vast majority of people. But, for an unlucky small percentage of cases, it produces severe – sometimes, even fatal – illness.

     

    Which is pretty much what you see with seasonal flu.

     

    Except . . . with this flu, the age groups hardest hit are much younger than we normally see with influenza.  A lot younger.

     

    For weeks people have been trying to figure out if this flu is more, or less deadly than seasonal flu.  I’m not sure we know the answer to that question yet.

     

    I know that if you take the estimated number of cases around the country – or around the world – and divide it by the known number of deaths, you come up with a `comfortingly’ low CFR (Case Fatality Ratio). 

     

    And I am comforted by this number.

     

    But I’m not convinced we have a good handle on either the number of infected or the number of deaths, and so I take these calculations with a very large grain of salt.

     

    I think we would have noticed by now if this virus had a particularly high mortality rate, although there are some worrisome reports coming out of places like Manitoba and Argentina.

     

    For now, it appears that that this virus has roughly the same virulence as seasonal flu, albeit with a disturbing predilection for younger victims. 

     

    That could change over time, of course, and may vary right now between different populations and societies. 

     

     

    So . . .assuming that this virus isn’t any deadlier than seasonal flu, why do we care? 

     

    First, we care because this is a novel virus, one that most humans have no immunity to, and that means that over the next year or two, a lot of people are going to catch it

     

    During a pandemic, 2 to 3 times more people are infected each year than normal.  And so, even with a low mortality rate, the number of people that could die can double or even triple over that of a normal flu season.  

     

    That would also mean double or triple the number of people needing hospital care, and much higher rates of absenteeism from work and school.

     

    With this virus hitting younger adults and children disproportionately hard, it will also have a greater psychological effect than we see with seasonal flu, which primarily kills the elderly.  

     

    All of these things can have a serious impact on our society, our economy, and our ability to deliver essential services. Particularly health care.

     

    Since the last pandemic, 42 years ago, we’ve reduced the surge capacity of our hospital systems considerably, in order to streamline them and save money. 

     

    We’ve neither the beds, or the staff, to care for hundreds of thousands of additional flu patients each year. 

     

    To make matters worse, HCWs (Health Care Workers) are likely to suffer a high rate of infection and absenteeism, further degrading the system’s ability to cope with a surge of patients.

     

    We may also find ourselves facing shortages of ventilators during the peak of the flu season, and having to make tough choices about who gets one, and who doesn’t.

     

    And all that assumes this virus doesn’t pick up virulence.

     

    Which brings us to our second big concern.

     

    Influenza viruses are inherently unstable.  They change over time.  Sometimes they become milder, sometimes they pick up virulence, or resistance to antivirals.


    Which is why we need to reformulate our flu vaccines every year or so, because influenza is always a moving target.

     

    Over the past year, the seasonal H1N1 virus (a distant cousin of the pandemic H1N1), has become almost 100% resistant to oseltamivir (Tamiflu).   There are serious concerns that this pandemic virus could, over time, acquire the same resistance.

     

    That would seriously compromise our ability to treat people with severe influenza symptoms, and would probably drive the fatality rate higher.

     

    And, as we saw in 1918, and to a lesser extent in other pandemics, the first wave can be deceptively mild.  As this virus replicates in more and more hosts, the odds of producing a dangerous mutation (or a reassortment with another virus) goes up.

     

    It is impossible to predict what `Swine Flu version 2.0’ will look like, or when it might be released. It might actually be less virulent than what we see today. 

     

    But it could also be much worse.

     

    Even if we ignore the possibility of something worse coming down the pike next month, or next fall, or in 2010  . . . the pandemic we have right now will no doubt serve up plenty of grief.

     

    And so it is prudent that we take this pandemic seriously.  That we take reasonable steps to prepare our families, our businesses, and our communities to deal with it.  

     

    Even if it appears `mild’ or `moderate’  right now.

     

    To learn how, visit the HHS’s pandemic website www.pandemicflu.gov.

     

    There has never been a better time to volunteer to help with the American Red Cross, The Medical Reserve Corps, CERT, or your Neighborhood watch.  

     

    And if your pocketbook can stand it, there are organizations like the Red Cross, Red Crescent, CARE, Save The Children, UNICEF, and others that could use your financial support as well.

     

    If, for most of us, this pandemic turns out to be a non-event, we can thank our lucky stars.  But as we do, we need to remember that not everyone will be that fortunate.

     

    There will be families all over the world impacted by this, with many enduring terrible losses.  Regardless of the overall statistics, for them, this won’t be a `mild’ pandemic.

     

    There will likely be economic, political, and probably even international diplomatic fallout from this pandemic, as well.

     

    As I stated at the top of this essay, I don’t know where this pandemic will lead us. 

     

    But I do expect it to be a bumpy ride.

    Saturday, June 27, 2009

    Referral: Effect Measure

     

     

    # 3402

     

     

    The Revere’s at Effect Measure give us a good overview this morning on some of the things we know, and don’t know, about this novel pandemic virus.   

     

    Swine flu: to every thing there is a season

     

    Most of what I know about the science of influenza, I’ve learned from the Effect Measure Blog. 

     

    As always, highly recommended.

     

    (and thanks for the gracious mention this morning, guys!)

    The Critical Path To A Vaccine

     

     

    # 3401

     

    In my post-paramedic career I was an estimator and project manager on a number of large commercial construction projects. 

     

    One of the skills you learn is Critical Path Analysis and the use of PERT (Project Evaluation and Review Technique) and Gantt Charts (a bar chart that illustrates a project schedule)

    A sample Gantt chart is depicted below, followed by a PERT chart.

    image

     

    image

     

    These complex appearing charts can often mean the difference between success and failure of an entire project.

     

    A few years later, when I became a computer consultant and custom software programmer,  I found myself using the same techniques when I was designing large software projects.

     

    In any complex project there are steps, or actions, that can only be taken once other steps have been completed, while others can run in parallel.

     

    When building a house, you can’t pour the slab until the plumber has roughed in the plumbing and the building inspector has signed off on it.  

     

    But you can schedule the drywall and the landscaper at the same time.  And you can have the roofer putting on shingles while the electrician is roughing in the wiring.

     

    Of course, you could just wait and do each item in sequence.  But you lose precious days, weeks, or even months that way, and for most projects, that would mean prohibitive cost overruns.  

     

    Which is why the CPM (Critical Path Method) is so important.

     

    And when you are talking about rolling out a massive vaccination program against a novel influenza, wasted time could cost many lives.

     

    First, a news article about the proposed vaccination program for the United States, and then some thoughts about the critical path to getting it done.

     

     

    Massive Swine Flu Vaccination Campaign Being Discussed

    Posted on: Saturday, 27 June 2009, 06:35 CDT

     

    According to officials, an unprecedented 600 million doses of swine flu vaccine may be given this fall even though officials have not yet developed a way to administer such a large number of shots.

     

    The campaign would be much larger than the normal 115 million doses of seasonal flu vaccine administered each year, said officials at a national vaccine advisory committee meeting.

     

    Currently, no decision has been made as to whether the swine flu vaccination will take place.

     

    According to health officials, the campaign could be here soon.

     

    As many as 60 million doses of the vaccine could be ready for distribution by September, if the vaccine can be tested and produced.

     

    Despite the unknowns, officials are preparing for a massive vaccination campaign, and are fearful that the illness could accelerate by winter.  Discussions on the massive campaign dominated a three-day meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which guides the U.S. on vaccination policies.

     

    (Continue . . .)

     

    Despite the `forward looking’ statements about delivering 600 million doses of vaccine to Americans this fall, an awful lot must happen before that can become even a remote possibility.

     

    The projection of 60 million doses of vaccine ready for distribution in September is also highly speculative, given that we don’t have any animal or human studies yet, and we don’t know how much antigen will be required to invoke an immune reaction.

     

    Until we know that, we can’t really know how many doses will be available, or when.

     

    The CDC, to their credit, has continually resisted giving any timetable for the American public seeing mass vaccinations against the pandemic flu. 

     

    Although the first batches of vaccine have been ordered for about 20 million critical infrastructure workers, the decision to manufacture enough vaccine for the entire nation has not been made

     

    Why not?

     

    First, until we have animal and human studies showing that this pandemic vaccine is safe and effective, you really don’t want to be ordering up 600 million doses of an unproven vaccine.  

     

    Second, until we know how much antigen is required (and whether it will take 1 or 2 shots per person), we don’t even know how much vaccine to order.  

     

    There’s a big difference between needing 300 million doses and 600 million.

     

    Third, scientists are waiting as long as possible before ordering the bulk of the vaccine because they fear the virus could mutate over the summer, which might make any vaccine produced now less effective in the fall.

     

    Fourth, we honestly don’t know how long it will take to produce enough vaccine for 600 (or even 300) million doses.

     

    Suggesting that it could all be done `by fall’, as the above article does - given the global competition for available vaccine production runs - would seem to be more than a little optimistic.

     

    Fifth, authorities aren’t quite sure how they can deliver up to 600 million doses of vaccine (assumes 2 shots, 3 weeks apart) to 300 million people in a short period of time. 

     

    And that’s on top of administering roughly 120 million seasonal flu shots.

     

    It’s never been done before.  

     

    The last time it was tried, in 1976, it ended up being a public health debacle (see Deja Flu, All Over Again).   No one is anxious to see a repeat of that fiasco.

     

    Health Departments around the country have been hit hard by budget cuts over the past few years, and no one knows where the money and personnel will come from to accomplish this monumental task. 

     

    And assuming that high risk groups will be prioritized to receive the vaccine, that will add another layer of complexity to the program.

     

    Tracking recipients, and possible adverse effects, adds another wrinkle. 

     

    With 50 states, and thousands of county health departments involved, there are an incredible number of logistical problems involved in any national vaccination program.

     

     

    And Sixth, it isn’t clear how many Americans would be willing to take a swine flu vaccine.  

     

    The constant reminders from many officials that this virus is `relatively mild’ and `no worse than seasonal flu’ may come back to haunt officials in the fall, should they decide to push the vaccine.   Especially if the virus picks up virulence.

     

    How much sway the anti-vaccine crowd and the conspiratorial websites will have, is also unknown.   But you can bet that they, and the media, will play up any reports of side effects from the vaccine.

     

    Selling the idea that – in addition to a seasonal vaccine, people need to get two pandemic jabs – isn’t going to be easy. 

     

    The serpentine route to developing and deploying a vaccine to an entire nation is fraught with numerous twists and turns, and no one can foresee them all in advance. 

     

    I certainly can’t.  

     

    And even armed with the best PERT and Gantt charts they can devise, the planners in our public health departments can’t either.

     

    In an extraordinarily complex operation such as this, there are simply too many opportunities for problems to arise, and delays to occur.  Which is why the CDC is wisely refraining from making promises regarding delivery of a vaccine.

     

     

    Despite these (and many other) obstacles, I remain in favor of developing and deploying a swine flu vaccine this fall. 

     

    I bring up these issues, not to discourage a vaccine, but to make sure people have a realistic idea of what they can . . . and can’t . . . expect this fall.

     

    I fully expect that, barring some major problem in the clinical trials, some quantity of pandemic vaccine will be available this fall.   I further expect that over the winter, more vaccine will become available.

     

    How much?  

     

    I don’t think anyone knows right now.   Hopefully enough to protect those at greatest risk from this virus.  

     

    But I wouldn’t put much money on the idea that – as the above article suggests600 million doses of vaccine could be given to all 300 million Americans this fall. 

     

    Call me a cynic, but I just don’t see a path that gets that done by the end of this year.

    Gregory Härtl Radio Interview Monday

     


    # 3401

     

     

    On Monday,  June 29th at 4pm and 6pm EDTRadio Sandy Springs will broadcast a 1 hour interview with WHO spokesman Gregory Härtl on the H1N1 `swine flu’ pandemic.

     

    The interview, conducted earlier this week by Sharon Sanders of FluTrackers, is the latest in a series of high profile interviews on The Infectious Disease Show that may be heard online on Radio Sandy Springs.

     

    Theses shows are archived, and you can listen to, or download earlier broadcasts in MP3 format.

     

     

    • An earlier interview with Dr. Fedson, conducted on April 6th, may be heard here.

    If you miss the live broadcast on the web, the archive is usually posted within 48 hours. 

    And of course, if you are really desperate for flu related interviews, my last two (low profile) appearances on the show were in February, which are archived here and here.

    Friday, June 26, 2009

    Not Too Early In The Season

     

     

    # 3400

     

    Hurricane models, particularly model runs that are created before a system has reached hurricane or tropical storm strength, are notoriously unreliable.  

     

    And so, these two computer runs (see below) from this evening are probably way off base.


    Still . . . it is hurricane season

     

    And right now there is an area of low pressure in the western Caribbean that the National Hurricane Center is watching.   

     

    One model (the GFDL) brings it ashore in south Florida as a tropical storm in 4 days time.   Another model (the HWRF) has it as a Cat 1 hurricane threatening West-Central Florida on Wednesday.

     

    image

    GFDL Computer Model for June 29th

     

    image

    HWRF Computer Models For mid-week (July 1st).

    image

    `Spaghetti’ model with all runs putting this system in the GOM (Gulf of Mexico) next week.

     

     

    Right now, I wouldn’t put any money on either of these scenarios. It is simply too soon to know if this system will intensify, or where it will go. 

     

    Maybe we’ll know better by Sunday.

     

    But it is a good reminder that if you live anywhere along the Atlantic or Gulf Coast (including up to a couple of hundred miles inland), you are within the strike zone of hurricanes.

     

    And even those who live hundreds of miles from the coast can see tornadoes and floods from the remnants of a tropical system. 

     

    Now is the time to prepare.  If you haven’t visited the FEMA Hurricane website, this weekend would be a good time to do so.

    image

     

    You can also visit READY.GOV Hurricane Preparedness page for more information on how to prepare.

     

    But don’t just read about it. Do it. 

     

    Get your family, or your business, ready to deal with a disaster.

     

    It is early in the hurricane season, and normally we don’t see really big storms until late July or August.    But that doesn’t mean it never happens.

     

    It’s not too early in the season to pay attention.

    Flu Vaccines: A Tough Sell

     

     

    # 3399

     

     

    The uptake of influenza vaccines in the United States and Canada is pretty low, with just over 1/3rd of Americans getting shots, and slightly less than 1/3rd of Canadians taking the jab.

     

    Even more concerning is the very demographic – teenagers and young adults – who are the most severely affected by this pandemic strain are traditionally the least inclined to get a flu shot.

     

    Complicating matters, it will probably take two shots, 3 or 4 weeks apart, to convey immunity. 

     

    That means 2 visits to a clinic. 

     

    Which may be a tough sell after all we’ve heard from officials about how `mild’ this virus is and how `it’s no worse than seasonal flu’.

     

    How receptive the public is going to be to any mass immunization plan is going to be a big question. 

     

    The Canadian Press has the results of a recent poll showing the rates of vaccination from last flu season. 

     

     

    Flu shot data points to swine flu challenge: Young adults don't get flu shots

    Flu shot data points to swine flu challenge: Young adults don't get flu shots

    Fri, 2009-06-26 12:28.

    By: THE CANADIAN PRESS

    TORONTO - New data on who got a flu shot in Canada last year underscores a challenge public health officials may face as they plan for a mass swine flu vaccination campaign: most young adults don't get flu shots.

     

    Just under a third of Canadians aged 12 and older got a flu shot last year, Statistics Canada reported Friday in data drawn from the Canadian Community Health Survey, an annual effort to collect health information on a broad cross section of Canadians.

     

    But that average was drawn upwards by the fact that 67 per cent of people 65 and older were vaccinated against influenza last fall.

     

    The rates were substantially lower among people in their teens, 20s, 30s and 40s - the group which currently appears to be at highest risk of catching the novel H1N1 flu virus and of having severe disease or dying if infected.

     

    Only 26 per cent of those aged 12 to 64 took the preventive seasonal flu vaccine in 2008, Statistics Canada said.

     

    Among healthy males, about 21 per cent of teens, 15 per cent of those 20 to 34 and 19 per cent of those aged 35 to 49 had a flu shot. Among healthy females, the rates were a bit higher in most age categories: just over 20 per cent of teens, 23 per cent of 20 to 34 year olds and 25 per cent of those aged 35 to 44 got a flu shot.

     

    (Continue . . .)