# 5440
Today’s MMWR from the CDC, released on this World TB Day, contains two reports on the incidence of Tuberculosis in the United States.
I’ve pulled some excerpts from each report (and reformatted for readability), but follow the links to read them in their entirety.
The first takes a closer look at an unexpected drop in TB cases in two states – Georgia and Pennsylvania – in 2009, and concludes that these reductions were real, and not the result of surveillance artifacts, health-care provider under diagnoses, or underreporting.
Assessment of Declines in Reported Tuberculosis Cases --- Georgia and Pennsylvania, 2009
Weekly
March 25, 2011 / 60(11);338-342
What is already known on this topic?
In 2009, tuberculosis (TB) incidence in the United States decreased to 3.8 cases per 100,000 population, the lowest recorded rate since national TB surveillance began in 1953. The 11.4% decrease from 2008 was the greatest single-year decrease ever recorded.
What is added by this report?
Findings from systematic investigations in Georgia and Pennsylvania, two states that experienced unexpectedly large decreases in TB incidence in 2009, indicate that the decline in new TB disease in those states appeared actual and not attributable to surveillance artifact, health-care provider underdiagnosis, or underreporting.
What are the implications for public health practice?
The TB surveillance systems in Georgia and Pennsylvania appear to be functioning appropriately. Current efforts to diagnose, treat, and report TB cases should be vigorously maintained as the United States moves closer to the goal of TB elimination.
The second report looks at the trends in Tuberculosis in the United States, and finds that while significant reductions in TB have been made, the stated goal back in 1989 of reaching an incidence rate of < 0.1 per 100,000 population by 2010 has not been met.
Trends in Tuberculosis --- United States, 2010
Weekly
March 25, 2011 / 60(11);333-337In 2010, a total of 11,181 tuberculosis (TB) cases were reported in the United States, for a rate of 3.6 cases per 100,000 population, which was a decline of 3.9% from 2009 and the lowest rate recorded since national reporting began in 1953 (1). This report summarizes provisional 2010 data from the National TB Surveillance System and describes trends since 1993.
Despite an average decline in TB rates of 3.8% per year during 2000--2008, a record decline of 11.4% in 2009 (2), and the 2010 decline of 3.9%, the national goal of TB elimination (defined as <0.1 case per 100,000 population) by 2010 was not met (3).
Although TB cases and rates decreased among foreign-born and U.S.-born persons, foreign-born persons and racial/ethnic minorities were affected disproportionately by TB in the United States. In 2010, the TB rate among foreign-born persons in the United States was 11 times greater than among U.S.-born persons.
TB rates among Hispanics, non-Hispanic blacks, and Asians were seven, eight, and 25 times greater, respectively, than among non-Hispanic whites. Among U.S.-born racial and ethnic groups, the greatest racial disparity in TB rates was for non-Hispanic blacks, whose rate was seven times greater than the rate for non-Hispanic whites.
Progress toward TB elimination in the United States will require ongoing surveillance and improved TB control and prevention activities to address persistent disparities between U.S.-born and foreign-born persons and between whites and minorities.
FIGURE 1. Rate* of tuberculosis (TB) cases, by state/area --- United States, 2010†
Source: National TB Surveillance System.
* Per 100,000 population.
† Provisional data as of February 26, 2011.
§ 20 states had TB case rates <2.0 (range: 0.61--1.88) per 100,000
What is already known on the topic?
In 1989, the Strategic Plan for Elimination of Tuberculosis in the United States set a target date of 2010 to achieve its goal, defined as an annual tuberculosis (TB) case rate of <0.1 per 100,000 population.
What is added by this report?
For 2010, preliminary data show a national TB case rate of 3.6 per 100,000 population, a decrease of 3.9% from 2009, but the goal of eliminating TB in the United States by 2010 was not achieved, and foreign-born persons and racial/ethnic minorities continued to be affected disproportionately.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Ongoing surveillance and improved TB control and prevention activities, especially among disproportionately affected populations, are needed to eliminate TB in the United States.
