Monday, September 29, 2014

ECDC Rapid Risk Assessment For EV-D68

image

 


# 9121

 

The outbreak of EV-D68 – an (up-till-now) rarely seen non-polio enterovirus infection – continues in North America with more than 40 states and several provinces in Canada reporting cases.

 

While most of those infected (primarily children) will only experience a mild-to-moderate `cold’, a small percentage have been made sick enough to require hospitalization and even require ventilatory support (see CDC Update On EV-D68 – Sept 25th).


Late on Friday the EV-D68 story took another turn when the CDC announced it was investigating – along with Colorado Health officials – a cluster of 9 children presenting with neurological illness of unknown etiology, and that EV-D68 was on the short list of possible causes (see CDC HAN: Acute Neurologic Illness with Focal Limb Weakness of Unknown Etiology in Children).

 

Although primarily associated with respiratory symptoms, EV-D68 has been tentatively implicated in neurological presentations in the past, including last winter (see Acute Flaccid Paralysis Cases In California) . An investigation is now underway to determine the cause of this cluster in Denver, and to see if there are similar cases in other regions of the country.

 

While small outbreaks of EV-D68 have been reported in the past – particularly in Asia, the Pacific, and in parts of Europe – this North American outbreak is the largest ever documented.

 

That said, EV-D68 is rarely tested for, and generally not considered a `notifiable disease’, and so its actual incidence around the globe is probably greatly underappreciated.

 

Taking note of these events, and knowing that infectious diseases perfectly capable of crossing oceans, the ECDC has today released their Rapid Risk Assessment: Enterovirus 68 detections in the USA and Canada.

 

The result is a detail-rich history of the virus,  a terrific chart of older outbreaks over the past decade, and an extensive list of journal references and citations.

 

I’ve only posted their main conclusions, so follow the link to read the report in its entirety.  When you come back, I’ll have a bit more on one possible reason why this outbreak may be spreading so rapidly.


Enterovirus 68 detections in the USA and Canada

Main conclusions


From mid-August to 24 September 2014, a total of 220 people from 32 US states were confirmed to have respiratory illness caused by EV-D68. Canada has also experienced an increase in severe respiratory illness associated with EV-D68 cases since mid-August 2014.
  • An epidemiological link across the clusters reported in several US states has not yet been established, and it cannot be ruled out that the virus is circulating independently in several locations.
  • To date, EU/EEA countries have not reported a growing number of acute respiratory infections or an increased number of hospital admissions.
  • Sporadic cases of EV-D68 have been documented in several EU/EEA countries in recent years. In 2014, EV-D68 was detected in at least four EU/EEA countries but no epidemic clusters of severe disease have been reported; none of the Member States has so far issued an Early Warning and Response System (EWRS) notification.
  • The likelihood for cases to be laboratory-confirmed in EU/EEA countries is low because most countries do not routinely screen for EV-D68, and the disease is not notifiable.
  • If all other respiratory pathogen detections were negative, or if rhino-/enterovirus was detected initially, EV-D68 should be considered the causative pathogen of the disease. More systematic testing of severe respiratory illness cases for EV-D68 could be considered in EU/EEA countries to better document the circulation of this virus.
  • EU/EEA countries need to remain vigilant and consider strengthening respiratory sample screening for enteroviruses and enterovirus typing.
  • Based on the current information, EU/EEA countries have a moderate risk of EV-D68 transmission because the circulation of this strain in the population is low.

 

 

Buried within this report is a one-line mention and a reference to a study, published late last year, which looked at recent genetic changes to EV-D68:

 

Recent research has suggested a change in the antigenicity and receptor properties of EV-D68, which now preferably binds to upper respiratory tract sialic acid receptors as opposed to the earlier lower respiratory tract binding [14].

 

The study, published in the Journal of Virology, finds that the EV-D68 virus has evolved into at least three lineages and that they all bind preferentially to α2-6 SAs – the same receptor cell used to great effect by seasonal influenza viruses. They also suggest that relatively recent changes in its antigenicity and/or receptor binding properties may be increasing its prevalence around the globe.

 

Antigenic and Receptor Binding Properties of Enterovirus 68

Tadatsugu Imamuraa, Michiko Okamotoa, Shin-ichi Nakakitab, Akira Suzukia, Mariko Saitoc, Raita Tamakia, Socorro Lupisang, Chandra Nath Roya, Hiroaki Hiramatsuf, Kan-etsu Sugawarad, Katsumi Mizutae, Yoko Matsuzakid, Yasuo Suzukif and Hitoshi Oshitania

ABSTRACT

Increased detection of enterovirus 68 (EV68) among patients with acute respiratory infections has been reported from different parts of the world in the late 2000s since its first detection in pediatric patients with lower-respiratory-tract infections in 1962. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms for this trend are still unknown. We therefore aimed to study the antigenicity and receptor binding properties of EV68 detected in recent years in comparison to the prototype strain of EV68, the Fermon strain.

We first performed neutralization (NT) and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests using antisera generated for EV68 strains detected in recent years. We found that the Fermon strain had lower HI and NT titers than recently detected EV68 strains. The HI and NT titers were also significantly different between strains of different genetic lineages among recently detected EV68 strains.

We further studied receptor binding specificities of EV68 strains for sialyloligosaccharides using glycan array analysis. In glycan array analysis, all tested EV68 strains showed affinity for α2-6-linked sialic acids (α2-6 SAs) compared to α2-3 SAs. Our study demonstrates that emergence of strains with different antigenicity is the possible reason for the increased detection of EV68 in recent years. Additionally, we found that EV68 preferably binds to α2-6 SAs, which suggests that EV68 might have affinity for the upper respiratory tract.

IMPORTANCE Numbers of cases of enterovirus 68 (EV68) infection in different parts of the world increased significantly in the late 2000s. We studied the antigenicity and receptor binding properties of recently detected EV68 strains in comparison to the prototype strain of EV68, Fermon. The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neutralization (NT) titers were significantly different between strains of different genetic lineages among recently detected EV68 strains.

We further studied receptor binding specificities of EV68 strains for sialyloligosaccharides using glycan array analysis, which showed affinity for α2-6-linked sialic acids (α2-6 SAs) compared to α2-3 SAs. Our study suggested that the emergence of strains with different antigenicities was the possible reason for the increased detections of EV68 in recent years. Additionally, we revealed that EV68 preferably binds to α2-6 SAs. This is the first report describing the properties of EV68 receptor binding to the specific types of sialic acids.

 

An intriguing and plausible – but as yet, unproven – explanation for the rapid and (as far as we know) unprecedented spread of EV-D68 in North America.

 

But one that will require considerable laboratory analysis and study to prove one way or another.