Showing posts with label EPA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EPA. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 06, 2011

CDC Q&A On Radioactive Iodine In Milk

 

 


# 5466

 

 

With the reactor crises in Japan still front page news – and likely to remain so for months – naturally there is concern in this country, and around the world, about how radioactive releases may affect our health.

 

Although there are – according to this New York Times Article – many daunting challenges in the way of safely shutting these reactors down, for now at least, the levels of radiation released from the Fukushima facility do not pose a public health hazard beyond Japan.

 

 

Given the often breathless media reporting on the (real and imagined) public health threats posed by radiation being dispersed from these damaged plants, an occasional reality check is advisable.

 

To that end, the CDC maintains a webpage on Radiation Emergencies, which includes a number of Fukushima specific pages.

 

image

 

Although low levels of radioactive iodine 131 have been detected in the United States (and globally), the levels remain well below the level of public health concern.

 

Due to public interest in the matter, the CDC has released a new Q&A on radioactive iodine in milk:

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions About Iodine-131 Found in Milk

Is it safe to drink milk?

Yes. People do not need to stop drinking milk because of concerns about radiation at these low levels. The levels of Iodine-131 found in milk are extremely low, and many times less than the FDA intervention level.

What are the levels that would start to affect my thyroid?

The level of Iodine-131 that would affect thyroid health depends on many factors. The developing fetus, newborns, infants, and young children are particularly sensitive to iodine-131. The FDA’s level for intervention is conservative and provides a large safety margin to protect public health.

How long will there be traces of iodine-131 from Japan in milk?

Given the uncertainty related to the nuclear reactors in Japan, we don’t know how levels of Iodine-131 currently seen in milk may change over time. However, we do know that Iodine-131 becomes less radioactive quickly in the environment. We are continuing to monitor milk so that we know when levels go up or down.

Are there any groups of people that are especially sensitive to iodine-131?

The developing fetus, newborns, infants and young children are particularly sensitive to iodine-131. However, levels being measured now are still many times below the FDA intervention level, even for these groups.

Why does Iodine-131 collect in milk?

Airborne Iodine-131 that deposits on pastures may be consumed by dairy cows.  A portion of the Iodine-131 consumed by a cow would then be transferred into the cow's milk.

Should I drink goat’s milk or other types of milk?

Historically, when cow’s milk has been affected by Iodine-131, so has goat’s milk.

What if I have thyroid disease? Would Iodine-131 affect me any differently?

The effects of Iodine-131 on health depend on many factors.  At this time, levels of Iodine-131 are still many times below the FDA intervention level.  If you have specific questions or concerns, contact your physician.

 

 

You’ll also find a variety of Japan-related briefings on nuclear radiation on the CDC website, including:

 

Japan: Radiation and Health

Fact Sheets

 

 


Those with long memories will recall that it was concerns over the accumulation of radioactive strontium-90 in milk (and the environment) that led to the banning of above-ground nuclear testing in 1963.

 

Prior to that time, incredibly, hundreds of above-ground atomic tests were conducted all around the world, releasing significant quantities of radioactive isotopes including (americium-241, cesium-137, iodine-131, strontium-90).

 

Strontium-90, which acted much like calcium in the human body, was of particular concern as it ended up deposited in bones and teeth, raising serious concerns over future cancer risks.

 

It is worth noting that radioactive iodine 131– with a half-life of just 8 days – poses far less danger than strontium-90, whose half-life was nearly 3 decades.

 

While far removed from today’s situation, some of you may find the  EPA’s extensive web site on above-ground nuclear testing during the `bad old days’, and the types of radioactive isotopes released, worth exploring (see Above-Ground Nuclear Blasts).

 

 

For those interested in monitoring local radiation levels in your region, you can visit the EPA’s RadNet website.

 

image

 

By visiting the RadNet Site you can click on the map (pictured above) and get real-time readout of current and recently detected radiation readings from scores of locations around the nation.

 

The EPA is also posting Daily Summaries on the radiation impact on the United States, along with regular statements.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

RadNet: The EPA’s Radiation Monitoring System

 

 

# 5454


While no harmful levels of radiation are presently expected to reach the United States as a result of the Fukushima reactor crisis, the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) RadNet System has detected very small increases in radiation levels since the March 11th earthquake.

 

The EPA reassures, however:

 

To-date, levels recorded at this monitor have been thousands of times below any conservative level of concern.

 

Still, I know many of my readers possess a good measure of scientific curiosity and would find it of interest to follow radiation monitors around the nation.

 

The EPA, fortunately, has made that information easily available.

 

image

 

By visiting the RadNet Site you can click on the map (pictured above) and get real-time readout of current and recently detected radiation readings from scores of locations around the nation.

 

The EPA is also posting Daily Summaries on the radiation impact on the United States, along with regular statements.


The latest statement (March 27th) reads:

 

As a result of the incident with the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan, several EPA air monitors have detected very low levels of radioactive material in the United States consistent with estimates from the damaged nuclear reactors. These detections were expected and the levels detected are far below levels of public-health concern.

 

Elevated levels of radioactive material in rainwater have been expected as a result of the nuclear incident after the events in Japan since radiation is known to travel in the atmosphere. There have been reports received that the states of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts have seen elevated levels of radiation in recent precipitation events. EPA is reviewing this data – however, in both cases these are levels above the normal background levels historically reported in these areas.

 

While short-term elevations such as these do not raise public health concerns – and the levels seen in rainwater are expected to be relatively short in duration – the U.S. EPA has taken steps to increase the level of nationwide monitoring of precipitation, drinking water, and other potential exposure routes to continue to verify that.

 

EPA’s only recommendation to state and local governments is to continue to coordinate closely with EPA, CDC and FDA – EPA will continue to communicate our nationwide sampling results as they come in.

 

Earlier EPA Updates

 

You’ll also find an informative FAQ page with information relating to the Fukushima radiation and the EPA’s monitoring network.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Last updated on Sunday, March 27, 2011 at 2:54:45 PM.

This page provides answers to questions EPA has received about the current nuclear power plant situation in Japan

 

An interesting website, well worth exploring.