Showing posts with label Ziad Memish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ziad Memish. Show all posts

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Mackay On The NEJM MERS-CoV Transmission Study

image

Coronavirus – Credit CDC PHIL

 

 

# 9010

 

 

Last night the NEJM published a study looking at the transmission of the MERS coronavirus to secondary contacts within a household, penned by such notables as Dr. Christian Drosten and Dr. Ziad Memish. The study focused on 26 index cases and their 280 household contacts, and found a relatively low (12 cases, 4%) incidence of household transmission.

 

Additionally, of the 26 index cases, only 6 (23%) appeared to have passed the infection on to other household members. Of those infections, only 7 were detected using RT-PRC testing, while 5 were detected though serology.

 

 

Transmission of MERS-Coronavirus in Household Contacts

Christian Drosten, M.D., Benjamin Meyer, M.Sc., Marcel A. Müller, Ph.D., Victor M. Corman, M.D., Malak Al-Masri, R.N., Raheela Hossain, M.D., Hosam Madani, M.Sc., Andrea Sieberg, B.Sc., Berend Jan Bosch, Ph.D., Erik Lattwein, Ph.D., Raafat F. Alhakeem, M.D., Abdullah M. Assiri, M.D., Waleed Hajomar, M.Sc., Ali M. Albarrak, M.D., Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq, M.D., Alimuddin I. Zumla, M.D., and Ziad A. Memish, M.D.

(Continue . . . )

 

 

This morning Dr. Ian Mackay takes a look at this study on his VDU Blog. Follow the link to read:

 

Thursday, 28 August 2014

MERS-CoV around the house-yes, it does transmit at home

Click on graph to enlarge.

Some Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) questions remain stubbornly unanswered even after two and a half years.


Today comes a study from Prof Christian Drosten and colleagues, including Prof Ziad Memish, released by the New England Journal of Medicine.[1] This study takes a look at MERS-CoV infection among the contacts of MERS cases.

(Continue . . .)

 

 

While a 4% transmission rate in these households is reassuring, it stands in sharp contrast to the much higher transmission rates observed in healthcare facilities.

 

To date we’ve seen more than 800 confirmed cases - and it is assumed that additionally, some unknown (but likely significant) number of cases have gone undetected. 

 

As only a handful of those cases have been attributed to animal-to-human transmission, it is obvious that under some conditions and settings the MERS coronavirus transmits more efficiently.

 

Today’s study adds to our knowledge of the virus, but there still remain a lot of unanswered questions including the role of mild or asymptomatic transmission. And of course the obvious concern, that the longer the virus circulates in people, the greater the chances that it will better adapt to human physiology. 

Sunday, July 20, 2014

EID Journal: Respiratory Viruses & Bacteria Among Pilgrims During The 2013 Hajj

image

Credit Wikipedia

 

# 8852

 

While MERS cases have thankfully  declined over the summer months, there remain concerns that it may return this fall during the time of the Hajj (early October), when roughly 2 million devout from around the world will make the pilgrimage to the Saudi Holy sites.

 

Mass gatherings such as the Hajj, Chunyun (Chinese New Years-Spring Festival), Carnival in Rio, Mardi Gras, and the Super Bowl all bring together huge groups of people, and all have the potential to amplify the transmission of diseases.

 

The good news is, that while mass gatherings may provide greater opportunities for disease outbreaks, history has shown that major epidemic outbreaks have been rare. One notable exception was the 1918 Liberty Loan Parade in Philadelphia, which was attended by as many as 200,000 people.

 

During the 1918 Pandemic, most cities instituted strict public health ordinances; they closed schools, movie houses, pool rooms, restaurants . . even churches. But Philadelphia went ahead with a massive parade on September 28th of that year, apparently heartened by the low number of flu cases reported in Pennsylvania to that point.

 

Over the next three weeks, at least 6,081 deaths from influenza and 2,651 deaths from pneumonia were registered in Pennsylvania, most occurring in Philadelphia (CDC source).

 

While a particularly dramatic example, concerns over seeing a repeat of this sort of thing run high enough that mass gathering medicine has now become a specialty (see Lancet: Mass Gathering and Health), and public health agencies around the world gear up for every large gathering event (see How The ECDC Will Spend Your Summer Vacation & The ECDC Risk Assessment On Brazil’s FIFA World Cup)

 


Although they carry the highest potential impact, public health concerns for these mass gathering events go far beyond exotic diseases like MERS and pandemic influenza.  

 

Tuberculosis, pneumococcal disease, meningococcal disease, chickenpox, pertussis, polio, cholera, mumps and a plethora of other respiratory viral and bacterial diseases all rank high on the list of potential infectious disease threats, along with concerns over food-borne and vector borne illnesses.

 

To try to quantify the risks of acquiring, and spreading, some of the more commonly seen respiratory pathogens during the Hajj, a group of researchers have – for the second year in a row – tested a group of Hajjis both before and after the Hajj for carriage of a variety of bacterial and viral pathogens.


While carriage these  pathogens among test subjects was high prior to attending the Hajj, they increased markedly immediately post-Hajj, indicating efficient transmission of several respiratory pathogens.

 

 

Respiratory Viruses and Bacteria among Pilgrims during the 2013 Hajj

Samir Benkouiten, Rémi Charrel, Khadidja Belhouchat, Tassadit Drali, Antoine Nougairede, Nicolas Salez, Ziad A. Memish, Malak al Masri, Pierre-Edouard Fournier, Didier Raoult, Philippe Brouqui, Philippe Parola, and Philippe GautretComments to Author
Abstract

Pilgrims returning from the Hajj might contribute to international spreading of respiratory pathogens. Nasal and throat swab specimens were obtained from 129 pilgrims in 2013 before they departed from France and before they left Saudi Arabia, and tested by PCR for respiratory viruses and bacteria. Overall, 21.5% and 38.8% of pre-Hajj and post-Hajj specimens, respectively, were positive for ≥1 virus (p = 0.003). One third (29.8%) of the participants acquired ≥1 virus, particularly rhinovirus (14.0%), coronavirus E229 (12.4%), and influenza A(H3N2) virus (6.2%) while in Saudi Arabia. None of the participants were positive for the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. In addition, 50.0% and 62.0% of pre-Hajj and post-Hajj specimens, respectively, were positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae (p = 0.053). One third (36.3%) of the participants had acquired S. pneumoniae during their stay. Our results confirm high acquisition rates of rhinovirus and S. pneumoniae in pilgrims and highlight the acquisition of coronavirus E229.

 

More than 2 million Muslims gather annually in Saudi Arabia for a pilgrimage to the holy places of Islam known as the Hajj. The Hajj presents major public health and infection control challenges. Inevitable overcrowding within a confined area with persons from >180 countries in close contact with others, particularly during the circumambulation of the Kaaba (Tawaf) inside the Grand Mosque in Mecca, leads to a high risk pilgrims to acquire and spread infectious diseases during their time in Saudi Arabia (1), particularly respiratory diseases (2). Respiratory diseases are a major cause of consultation in primary health care facilities in Mina, Saudi Arabia, during the Hajj (3). Pneumonia is a leading cause of hospitalization in intensive care units (4).

<SNIP>

In this study, we confirmed that performing the Hajj pilgrimage is associated with an increased occurrence of respiratory symptoms in most pilgrims; 8 of 10 pilgrims showed nasal or throat acquisition of respiratory pathogens. This acquisition may have resulted from human-to-human transmission through close contact within the group of French pilgrims because many of them were already infected with HRV or S. pneumoniae before departing from France. Alternatively, the French pilgrims may have acquired these respiratory pathogens from other pilgrims, given the extremely high crowding density to which persons from many parts of the world are exposed when performing Hajj rituals. Finally, contamination originating from an environmental source might have played a role.

(Continue . . . )

 

If all of this sounds vaguely familiar, you may recall the following Clinical Infectious Diseases study (also co-authored by Ziad Memish) - Unmasking Masks in Makkah: Preventing Influenza at Hajj – from 2012

.

Each year more than 2 million people from all over the world attend the Hajj pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. At least 60% of them develop respiratory symptoms there or during outward or homebound transit [1, 2] During recent interpandemic years, approximately 1 in 10 pilgrims with respiratory symptoms in Makkah have had influenza detected by polymerase chain reaction tests of respiratory samples [3, 4]. Pneumonia is the leading cause of hospitalization at Hajj, accounting for approximately 20% of diagnoses on admission [5].

 

All of this has the potential to help seed emerging strains of viral and bacterial diseases around the world, and while perhaps not nearly as dramatic as a pandemic outbreak, still carries with it considerable public health implications.

 

But this year – with fears that MERS might spread internationally  – public health officials must also be concerned with those 60%-80% of Hajjis who will return home this fall with respiratory symptoms.

 

We’ve discussed the The Limitations Of Airport Screening in the past, so in a different approach, the following sign appears in airports in the United Kingdom urging self-reporting of illness and travel history to one’s doctor. Similar signs have been erected at airports around the globe (see MERS Advisories Go Up In Some US Airports).

.

image

 

While we don’t know if MERS will make a return during the Hajj, given the high incidence of respiratory illnesses reported in returning Hajjis, I expect that we’ll be hearing a lot about testing for suspected MERS-CoV this fall. 

 

Undoubtedly the vast majority of these travelers will have influenza, Rhinoviruses, RSV, HCoV E229, or simple bacterial pneumonia, but ruling out the MERS coronavirus is going to represent a major public health logistical challenge, even in places like the UK and the United States.

 

How well this can be accomplished in low-resource regions of the world, to where many of the pilgrims will be returning, remains to be seen. The hope is that the level of MERS cases will remain low in the Middle East during the time of the Hajj,  as it has for the past two years. 

 

Stay tuned.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

ScienceInsider: When MERS Transmission Studies Clash

Photo: ©FAO/Ami Vitale

Credit FAO

 

# 8726

 

Last week, in More Evidence for Camel-to-Human MERS-CoV Transmission, we looked at a NEJM study that Dr. Ian Mackay rightfully pointed out on his blog, was based on a transmission event that had previously been described by Memish, Drosten, et al. in an EID Journal report published in March.


The NEJM study was co-authored by Dr Tariq Madani of King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, who was appointed special MERS advisor by the newly appointed Health Minister, Adel bin Mohammed Faqih,  last April.

 

Curiously, there was no mention of the earlier publication by Memish et at. on the same patient/camel testing in the EID Journal, published nearly two months earlier.  I would note that when I checked back yesterday, the editors at the NEJM had belatedly attached a terse note stating:

 

Editor’s note: The patient and camels discussed in this article are also described in Memish ZA, Cotten M, Meyer B, et al. Human infection with MERS coronavirus after exposure to infected camels, Saudi Arabia, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:1012-5.

 

This story only gets stranger, as we learn from a Science Insider report from Kai Kupferschmidt, who delves deeper into the behind-the-scenes machinations surrounding this study.  Included are observations and comments from Dr. Ian Mackay, Dr. Michael Osterholm, Dr. Christian Drosten, and Dr. Ziad Memish.

 

Along the way, we also see concerns expressed over possible contamination issues with the second paper’s test results.

 

While this story has the makings of a terrific prime-time soap opera, it doesn’t exactly infuse the reader with a warm fuzzy feeling over the way that MERS research is being conducted in Saudi Arabia.   Follow the link to read:

 

 

Research teams clash over too-similar MERS papers

Kai Kupferschmidt

Tuesday, June 10, 2014 - 6:45pm

A great story can be told again and again. But scientists working on the deadly Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) virus are puzzled by two papers appearing in separate journals that not only tell the same story, but also are based on data from the very same patient in Saudi Arabia.

(Continue . . .)

Tuesday, June 03, 2014

Referral: Mackay On MERS Trends & Farewell To Memish

image

Credit Dr. Ian Mackay VDU Blog

 

# 8698

 

Dr. Ian Mackay has been busy the past 12 hours, updating a number of his MERS outbreak charts, and penning a farewell to Dr. Ziad Memish, who yesterday found himself abruptly removed from his position of Deputy Minister of Health for Saudi Arabia (see An Unexpected Announcement From The Saudi MOH).

 

I’ve been as frustrated as anyone by the slow progress of MERS research (and parsimonious release of case information) from Saudi Arabia, and Dr. Memish has taken his share of grief over both issues.

 

But it isn’t clear how much control Dr. Memish actually had over these aspects of the investigation.  What is clear, is - as a well spoken, erudite, and western educated physician - with probably more experience in `mass gathering medicine’ than anyone else on the planet, Dr. Memish will be hard to replace. 

 

Two blog posts then, by Ian.   The first looks at Dr. Memish’s dismissal and the recent decline in MERS cases, while the second looks at the evolving demographics of MERS cases over the past couple of years.

 

MERS-CoV by week...good luck Professor Memish

We are now in the 116th week since MERS-CoV caused known illness in a  human; a week that has seen the loss of Professor Ziad Memish from the frontlines of the war on MERS.

 
Thankfully it was not a physically fatal loss, but rather a "standing down". Not only is Prof. Memish the father of Mass Gathering Medicine, but he has been the public and global face for the mischief caused by MERS since the beginning.

(Continue . . .)

 

 

 

MERS-CoV detection and age...

Just a few different ways of looking at age of living and deceased MERS-CoV people, globally, since 2012.

(Continue . . .)

Monday, June 02, 2014

An Unexpected Announcement From The Saudi MOH

image

 

# 8697

 

Dr. Ziad Memish – Deputy Minister of Health for Saudi Arabia – has been the very public face of the Saudi’s efforts (for better or worse) to quantify and control the MERS Coronavirus.  His name has been attached to many of the studies that have been conducted by labs around the world on this emerging coronavirus (see here, here, and here).

Despite this notoriety, he has also had to fend off growing international criticism on the slow progress being made against the spread of MERS, and very recently publicly stated he was `surprised’ at the criticisms being lodged.



Today, in the briefest of statements on the Saudi MOH website, we get word that suggests that Dr. Memish is no longer acting as the Deputy Minister of Health.  

 

A hat tip to @dspalten and @ilhamabuljadaye  whose twitter conversation led me to the link.  Reasons for Dr. Memish’s departure are not elucidated.

 

Health Minister who issues a decree absolving Dr. Ziad mimsh Undersecretary of public health Office

04 July 1435

The Minister of Health issued a designated engineer Adel bin Mohammed faqeeh said a decision to release Dr. Ziad Ben Ahmed mimsh Undersecretary of public health Office

 

The plot thickens.  . . .

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

ProMed Mail: Dr. Memish On Saudi MERS Patient & Camel Testing

image

Coronavirus – Credit CDC PHIL

 

 


# 7965

In a follow up to a story which we’ve been following since yesterday (see KSA MERS Investigation: Testing The Beast, Not The Beauty & MERS-CoV: CIDRAP & Dr. Mackay On The Saudi Camel Connection), ProMed Mail has published this afternoon an email from Dr. Ziad Memish , Deputy Minister for Public Health for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, that provides some additional details.

 

I’ve only included some excerpts, you’ll want to follow the link to read the entire release, including commentary by the editors at ProMed.

 

 

Published Date: 2013-11-12 13:01:10
Subject: PRO/AH/EDR> MERS-CoV - Eastern Mediterranean (85): animal reservoir, camel, susp, official
Archive Number: 20131112.2051424

MERS-COV - EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN (85): ANIMAL RESERVOIR, CAMEL, SUSPECTED, OFFICIAL

A ProMED-mail post http://www.promedmail.org
ProMED-mail is a program of the International Society for Infectious Diseases http://www.isid.org

Date: Tue 12 Nov 2013
From: Ziad Memish <zmemish@yahoo.com> [edited]


The Saudi Ministry of Health [MoH] continues to follow carefully all new cases of MERS-CoV diagnosed in KSA [Kingdom of Saudi Arabia] with routine contact tracing of all contacts inclusive of family contacts and HCWs [healthcare workers] who cared for the patient. On 7 Nov 2013 the Saudi MoH reported a new case: a 43-year-old male from Jeddah, who developed symptoms on 27 Oct 2013. He sought medical treatment on 3 Nov 2013. He is currently in an intensive care unit. The patient does not have any underlying chronic disease. He has no recent travel history outside of Jeddah. He had significant contact with animals but no contact with a known positive human case. To complete the investigation extensive environmental/animal contact sources were pursued. Camels owned by the patient which were symptomatic with fever and rhinorrhea were tested for MERS-CoV and tested positive

This is the 1st time that a camel related to a case tests positive for MERS-CoV by PCR. Further testing is ongoing to sequence the patient and the camel virus and compare genetic similarity level to conclude causality.

(Continue . . .)

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

UPMC: MERS-CoV Webcast With Dr. Ziad Memish

 

image

 

# 7590

 

Earlier today Dr. Ziad Memish – Deputy Minister of Health for Saudi Arabia - appeared in a 2-hour webcast along with Dr. Tom Inglesby - Director of the UPMC Center for Health Security – to discuss his insights from being on the frontlines with the emerging MERS coronavirus.

 

The webcast is now available on the UPMC Health Security.org website and on Youtube, and is very much worth your time to watch.

 

 

Insights from the Front Lines of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) Outbreak, with Drs. Ziad Memish and Tom Inglesby August 21, 2013

image

Friday, July 26, 2013

Lancet: Epidemiological, Demographic & Clinical Characteristics of MERS-CoV

image

Coronavirus – Credit CDC PHIL

 

 

# 7515

 

Overnight The Lancet published an analysis of 47 lab confirmed cases of MERS-CoV diagnosed in Saudi Arabia between September 2012 and June 15th 2013.

 

While the bulk of the study is behind a pay wall, we do have the abstract and several media reports quoting the corresponding author for this study; KSA Deputy Health Minister, Professor Ziad Memish

 

Dr. Memish has been quoted by Reuters as stating that, "So far there is little to indicate that MERS will follow a similar path to SARS."   At the same time, this new study concedes:

 

Major gaps in our knowledge of the epidemiology, community prevalence, and clinical spectrum of infection and disease need urgent definition

 

First stop, a link to the abstract, then a couple of links to media coverage.

 

Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study

Abdullah Assiri MD a b †, Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq FACP c †, Abdullah A Al-Rabeeah FRCS a, Fahad A Al-Rabiah MD d, Sami Al-Hajjar MD d, Ali Al-Barrak MD e, Hesham Flemban MD f, Wafa N Al-Nassir MD g, Hanan H Balkhy MD h, Rafat F Al-Hakeem MD a i, Hatem Q Makhdoom PhD j, Prof Alimuddin I Zumla FRCP a k l †, Prof Ziad A Memish FRCP a m n

Findings

47 individuals (46 adults, one child) with laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV disease were identified; 36 (77%) were male (male:female ratio 3·3:1). 28 patients died, a 60% case-fatality rate. The case-fatality rate rose with increasing age.

 

Only two of the 47 cases were previously healthy; most patients (45 [96%]) had underlying comorbid medical disorders, including diabetes (32 [68%]), hypertension (16 [34%]), chronic cardiac disease (13 [28%]), and chronic renal disease (23 [49%]). Common symptoms at presentation were fever (46 [98%]), fever with chills or rigors (41 [87%]), cough (39 [83%]), shortness of breath (34 [72%]), and myalgia (15 [32%]). Gastrointestinal symptoms were also frequent, including diarrhoea (12 [26%]), vomiting (ten [21%]), and abdominal pain (eight [17%]).

 

All patients had abnormal findings on chest radiography, ranging from subtle to extensive unilateral and bilateral abnormalities. Laboratory analyses showed raised concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase (23 [49%]) and aspartate aminotransferase (seven [15%]) and thrombocytopenia (17 [36%]) and lymphopenia (16 [34%]).

 

 

A key finding is that 96% (45 of 47) of these cases had pre-existing medical conditions.

  • diabetes (32 [68%])
  • hypertension (16 [34%])
  • chronic cardiac disease (13 [28%])
  • chronic renal disease (23 [49%])

 

BBC coverage of this report includes extended comments by Professor Memish, where he compares the threat from MERS-CoV with that of SARS a decade ago.

 

Mers: New virus 'not following Sars' path'

By James Gallagher Health and science reporter, BBC News

 

<Excerpt>

The lead researcher and Deputy Minister for Public Health, Prof Ziad Memish, said: "Despite sharing some clinical similarities with Sars, there are also some important differences.

 

"In contrast to Sars, which was much more infectious especially in healthcare settings and affected the healthier and the younger age group, Mers appears to be more deadly, with 60% of patients with co-existing chronic illnesses dying, compared with the 1% toll of Sars.

 

"Although this high mortality rate with Mers is probably spurious due to the fact that we are only picking up severe cases and missing a significant number of milder or asymptomatic cases.

 

"So far there is little to indicate that Mers will follow a similar path to Sars."

(Continue . . . )

 

 

In an accompanying article (Is MERS another SARS?), MERS researcher Professor Christian Drosten (see The Lancet: Virological Analysis Of A MERS-CoV Patient & Nature: Receptor For NCoV Found) - as reported in this Medscape article MERS and SARS: Similar Not Identical - is less sanguine in his analysis.

 

He notes that the incidence of diabetes among elderly male Saudis is fairly close to that reported among these cases, and that a high rate of chronic kidney disease and hypertension among patients is not unexpected, given that many of these cases were linked to nosocomial spread at a dialysis clinic.

 

Without broader community seroprevalence studies, Drosten argues that it is premature to regard this virus as primarily a threat to those with underlying disorders.

 

Complicating matters, since this study’s cut-off date in June, we’ve seen a growing number of asymptomatic cases reported among younger, presumably healthier, individuals. 

 

This from the most recent ECDC Rapid Risk Assessment on MERS-COV.

 

Ten asymptomatic cases have been reported since 8 June, eight by Saudi Arabia and two by the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Six of these asymptomatic cases have been health care workers. All the new cases reported since the previous update have been reported by Saudi Arabia and UAE.

 

This broad range of clinical presentation (asymptomatic to severe, even fatal illness) leaves investigators unsure whether the 90+ cases that have so far been identified represent the bulk of the infected cases or are just the `tip of a much larger iceberg’.

 

Crucial questions for which answers, right now, are frustratingly few.

Sunday, May 05, 2013

ProMed: Update From Dr. Ziad Memish On Coronavirus Cases

image

Coronavirus – Credit CDC PHIL

 

 

# 7233

 

In a follow up to two earlier blogs today (see Branswell: Saudi Coronavirus Cluster Increases To 13 & Update On Novel Coronavirus Cases) that increased the size of the cluster of cases to 13, and deaths to 7, we have the actual notification email from Dr. Ziad Memish published in ProMed Mail.

 

Subject: PRO/AH/EDR> Novel coronavirus - Eastern Mediterranean (18): Saudi Arabia
Archive Number: 20130505.1693290

NOVEL CORONAVIRUS - EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN (18): SAUDI ARABIA


************************************************************
A ProMED-mail post 
http://www.promedmail.org

ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases

http://www.isid.org

Date: Sunday, May 5, 2013, 11:18 PM
From: Ziad Memish <zmemish@yahoo.com>
Subject: Urgent follow up re nCOV cluster in Alhassa KSA


Dear colleagues,

As a follow up to the most recently reported 10 case cluster of nCOV in Alhasa in the Eastern Province of KSA. Our investigation is still ongoing and we picked up 3 more cases:

  • Case 11: 62 year old female with multiple comorbidities. Start of symptoms [19 Apr 2013] and deceased [3 May 2013]
  • Case 12: 71 year old male with multiple comorbidities. Start of symptoms [15 Apr 2013], deceased [3 May 2013]
  • Case 13: 58 year old female with comorbidities. Start of symptoms [1 May 2013] and currently ventilated in critical but stable condition.


So far there is no apparent community transmission and transmission seem linked to one HCF [health care facility].


We will keep you posted on progress

 

(Continue . . .)

 

While lacking in specifics, the reference to there being no community transmission, and that transmission is linked to a single healthcare facility, suggests that most of these cases acquired the infection while in the hospital.

 

ProMed Mail’s Editors commented (excerpt):

 

. . .  "So far there is no apparent community transmission and transmission seem linked to one HCF [health care facility]" supports a conclusion that this outbreak is a nosocomial outbreak, and the reason that all confirmed cases to date have had existing comorbidities is that they were presumably infected with the nCoV while hospitalized in this HCF for other pre-existing illnesses.

 

You may recall that the first known cluster of this novel coronavirus occurred just over a year ago at a hospital in Zarqua, Jordan. Two of those cases were eventually lab confirmed out of a cluster of at least 11 people (including 8 HCWs) with undiagnosed severe pneumonia. Two people died.  (See ECDC Report and FluTrackers Thread)