Showing posts with label culling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culling. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 07, 2013

Vietnam: 26,000 Quail Culled Over H5N1

image

Tien Giang Province – Credit Wikipedia

# 7547

 

 

With the Middle East’s MERS-CoV and China’s H7N9 virus grabbing all of the headlines, it is sometimes easy to forget that the H5N1 virus remains endemic in birds in many areas of the globe and that it still poses a pandemic threat.

 

Vietnam was one of the earliest countries affected by the H5N1 virus, and for a time, lead the world in human cases and deaths (total as of July 2013: 125 cases, 62 deaths).

 

Through massive educational and regulatory efforts, by 2006 they’d gone from being the worst afflicted country in the world to being viewed as the `poster child’ for successful bird flu containment.

 

But that victory was fleeting.

 

After nearly 18 months of quiescence, the virus retuned in 2007.  Since then, Vietnam has been engaged in a more-or-less constant battle with sporadic outbreaks of the virus in poultry, along with occasional human infections and fatalities. 

 

This year, Vietnam has reported two human H5N1 infections, one fatal. 

 

Today a report in from Tien Giang Province, in the southern part of the country, where tens of thousands of quail have been destroyed because of the virus.


This from the Saigon Daily.

Bird flu reoccurs in quails in Tien Giang Province

Bird flu has reoccurred in poultry in quail breeding farms in the Mekong Delta province of Tien Giang since July 2 and more than  26,000 infected quails have been destroyed in the province in the past month, said the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.

 

Several quail farms in Tien Giang have been hit by the H5N1 virus, which is likely to spread to other domestic bred birds.

 

The Ministry has hence sent an urgent dispatch to related agencies in Tien Giang, asking them to check quail farms and try to curb further bird flu outbreaks.

 

Under current regulations, poultry found infected with the bird flu virus must be destroyed and all other domestic bred birds in the locality must be vaccinated.

 

The Department of Animal Health is under orders to test the vaccines for chickens and ducks on quails. After vets verify these vaccines, an intensive vaccination campaign will be conducted.

 

As we learned in 2009 - when we were preoccupied with bird flu in Asia, and an H1N1 swine flu emerged in North America -  it is important not to focus solely on any one single threat.

 

For now, H5N1 remains primarily a threat to poultry. The virus remains poorly adapted to human physiology, and despite ample opportunities to cause illness in humans, the virus only causes rare, sporadic infections.

 

But H5N1, like all influenza viruses, is constantly changing . . looking for an evolutionary advantage.

 

 

So we watch it, along with others in the wild, for any signs that it may be better adapting to humans.

Thursday, August 01, 2013

H5N1: Nepal Bans Chicken Trade In Capital

 

image

 

 

# 5733

 

From Xinhua News this morning an update on the Nepali H5N1 situation that Crof and I have blogged on in recent days (see Crof’s Nepal: H5N1 situation ‘getting out of hand’ and my Aiding & Abetting H5N1 In Nepal).

 

With 16 outbreaks reported in the Nepali capital Kathmandu over the past two and a half weeks, and dozens more across the nation, authorities have decided to place a 1 week ban on the trade in chickens in the capital city while they conduct a culling operation.

 

Although Nepal has frequently reported outbreaks of H5N1 in poultry since late 2009, to date no human cases have been identified in that country.

 

 

Bird flu forces Nepal to ban chicken trade in capital

Aug 01,2013

KATHMANDU, Aug. 1 (Xinhua) -- Following the outbreak of 16 bird flu cases in 17 days since July 16 in Kathmandu, the animal health authorities of Nepal on Thursday declared ban on chicken trade in the Nepali capital for one week.

 

The authorities said the step was necessary to prevent further spread of the H5N1 virus so as to ensure that it does not ultimately affect the people.

 

Under the ban announced as per Animal Health and Livestock Services Act 1999, chickens cannot be supplied and sold in all three districts of the capital valley, including Lalitpur, Bhaktapur and Kathmandu.

 

"We expect to control bird flu within one week. If it does not happen, the ban may be extended further," said Bolraj Acharya, Chief of the Department of Livestock Services.

 

"We will try our best to bring the disease under control. The ban is for the same purpose," said Jay Mukund Khanal, Secretary at the Ministry of Agriculture.

 

The ban will be effective until August 7 and authorities have plans to cull all the affected chickens by this period.

 

Last year, the authorities culled 131,632 chickens and destroyed 378,350 eggs and 7,515 kg of feed across the country. In the past two weeks, in Kathmandu alone, authorities culled 31,194 chickens and destroyed 28,172 eggs and 7,715 kg of feed.

 

Apart from the 16 cases reported alone in the capital, 50 more cases have been reported in different parts of the country in the past two weeks since the beginning of the new fiscal year 2013/14 on July 16.

 

Bird flu was first reported in Nepal in January 2009 in Jhapa of eastern Terai plains. Since then, its recurrence has been reported time and again.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

OIE: H7N9 Represents An `Exceptional Situation’

 

image

Map Credit ECDC

 

# 7014

 

 

While I was away from my desk Crof posted a statement (see OIE on the "exceptional nature" of H7N9) from the OIE (World Organization For Animal Health) that discusses the difficulties inherent in containing an avian influenza outbreak that doesn’t visibly sicken poultry.

 

First excerpts from the statement, and OIE FAQ, and then I’ll return with more.

 

The OIE, World Organisation for Animal Health, highlights the exceptional nature of the influenza A(H7N9) event notified by China

Paris, 11 April 2013 – According to the official reports sent to the OIE by the Chinese Veterinary Authorities, poultry that have tested positive for the presence of influenza virus A(H7N9) and are also suspected of being the source of reported human cases, do not show any visible signs of disease, making it very difficult to detect this virus in poultry.

 

“Based on the information currently available we are facing a rather exceptional situation, because we are dealing with an influenza virus of very low pathogenicity for poultry which has the potential to cause severe disease when it infects humans”, stated the Director General of the OIE, Dr Bernard Vallat.

(Continue . . . )

 

 

The OIE also has a rather extensive FAQ on H7N9 Avian Influenza, portions of which are excerpted below:

 

Can culling be used as a control measure?

If the infection is detected in animals, generally a culling policy is used in the efforts to control and eradicate the disease.

Requirements include (and are described in the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code):

  • humane destruction of all infected and exposed animals (according to OIE animal welfare standards);
  • appropriate disposal of carcasses and all animal products;
  • surveillance and tracing of potentially infected or exposed poultry;
  • strict quarantine and controls on movement of poultry and any potentially contaminated vehicles and personnel;
  • thorough decontamination of infected premises ;
  • a period at least 21 days before restocking.

In the case of low pathogenic avian influenza like the current outbreaks of H7N9 declared by China, stamping out is generally applied at the level of the infected farm or within a short radius around the infected premises. 


Does OIE recommend vaccination of animals to control the disease?

When appropriate vaccines are available, vaccination aims to protect the susceptible bird populations from potential infection. Vaccination reduces viral excretions by animals and the virus’ capacity to spread. Vaccination strategies can effectively be used as an emergency effort in the face of an outbreak or as a routine measure in an endemic area. Any decision to use vaccination must include an exit strategy, i.e. conditions to be met to stop vaccination.

 

Careful consideration must be given prior to implementing a vaccination policy and requires that the recommendations from the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) on vaccination and vaccines are closely followed (www.oie.int\downld\AVIAN INFLUENZA\Guidelines on AI vaccination.pdf).

In short, vaccination should be implemented when culling policies cannot be applied either because the disease is endemic and therefore widely present, or the infection in affected animals is too difficult to detect.


What are the OIE recommendations for trade in poultry from a country infected with influenza A(H7N9)?

The risk analysis to be used by importing countries in order to protect their territory from pathogens introduction is very complex and is based on a long list of OIE standards.

In the case of outbreaks of low pathogenic avian influenza of the H7 strain in potential exporting countries, the trade recommendations that apply can be found in the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code (Chapter 10.4; 2013). These measures are science-based and should not result in unjustified trade barriers; they include zoning and the testing of the animal populations of origin.


What compensation measures should be applied for the concerned farmers?

Systems for financial compensation of farmers and producers who have lost their animals as a result of mandatory culling requested by national authorities vary around the world; they may not exist at all in some countries. The OIE encourages national authorities to develop and propose compensation schemes because they are a key to early detection and transparency in reporting the occurrence of animal diseases, including avian influenza.

What are the food safety recommendations?

Animals which have been culled as a result of control measures in response to an outbreak of avian influenza, including the A(H7N9) virus, should not enter the food and feed chain as a precautionary and regulatory measure.

There is no evidence to suggest that the consumption of poultry or eggs fit for human consumption could transmit the AI virus to humans.


What is the public health risk associated with avian influenza?

AI viruses are highly species-specific, but have, on rare occasions, crossed the species barrier to infect humans. This disease should not be confused with seasonal human influenza (flu), a very common human disease (generally caused by human H1 and H3 viruses). Transmission of AI viruses to humans has occurred when there is close contact with infected birds or heavily contaminated environments.

 

Human disease has usually been related to the transmission of a highly pathogenic virus of animal origin. The current influenza A(H7N9) virus notified to the OIE by China is low pathogenic for poultry; investigations are being conducted to demonstrate possible links with the human cases, as the genetic similarity has already been established.

 

Due to the potential for human infection, it is recommended that people working with, or in contact with poultry suspected of being infected with AI viruses, wear protective clothing including face masks, goggles, gloves and boots.


What prevention measures are recommended at the farm level?

It is essential for poultry producers to maintain biosecurity practices to prevent introduction of the virus in their flock:

  • keep poultry away from areas frequented by wild fowl;
  • keep control over access to poultry houses by people and equipment;
  • do not provide elements on property that may attract wild birds;
  • maintain sanitation of property, poultry houses and equipment;
  • avoid the introduction of birds of unknown disease status into flock;
  • report illness and death of birds; 
  • appropriate disposal of manure and dead poultry; 
  • vaccinate animals when appropriate.

 

 

 

The `exit strategy’ on vaccination mentioned in the second section above has been a largely ignored feature of the OIE avian flu recommendations for years.

 

In Avian influenza and vaccination: what is the scientific recommendation?, the OIE reiterated their strong recommendation that humane culling be employed to control avian influenza, and advising that vaccines should only be used as a temporary measure.

 

While the OIE conceded that some nations may require the use of vaccines for `several years', they have consistently urged that countries move away from that program and towards the more conventional culling policy. 

 

A policy change that has thus far failed to take hold in places like China, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Egypt.

 

For some reasons behind this lack of movement towards a culling policy, you may wish to revisit Food Insecurity And The Control Of Bird Flu.

Thursday, April 04, 2013

Shanghai: Culling Begins While One Contact Shows Signs Of Illness

 

image

Photo Credit – FAO

 

# 7074

 

 

The big news today coming out of China, beyond the five new cases and 2 deaths (see Xinhua: Updating The H7N9 Case Counts In Shanghai), has been the detection of the H7N9 virus in pigeons tested at a live-bird market.

 

We are also seeing reports that at least one contact of a confirmed (fatal) case has now developed symptoms, and is in isolation. 

 

Even though it is the middle of the night in China, reports and announcements continue to filter out  via Weibo, Twitter, and other media sources.

 

The following update (h/t Eric) from Xinhua News indicates that extensive culling of poultry has now been ordered. The mention of a `contact’ in isolation may be significant, as it is at least suggestive of H2H transmission, although we have no laboratory confirmation of infection. 

 

 

Shanghai begins culling poultry; one contact shows flu symptoms

English.news.cn   2013-04-05 01:30:22

SHANGHAI, April 5 (Xinhua) -- Authorities in Shanghai on Thursday closed a live poultry trading zone in an agricultural products market and began slaughtering all birds there after detecting H7N9 bird flu virus from samples of pigeon from the market.

 

Meanwhile, a person who had close contact with a dead H7N9 bird flu patient in Shanghai has been under treatment in quarantine after developing symptoms of fever, running nose and throat itching, the Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission said late Thursday.

 

China's Ministry of Agriculture said Thursday it found the H7N9 virus from pigeon samples collected at the Huhuai wholesale agricultural products market in Songjiang district of Shanghai.

 

After gene sequence analysis, the national avian flu reference laboratory concluded that the strain of the H7N9 virus found on pigeons was highly congenetic with those found on persons infected with H7N9 virus, the ministry said.

 

The Shanghai municipal agricultural commission said it has ordered proper disposal of the culled birds, their excrements and contaminated food as well as disinfection of the market and vehicles that carried them and other things that have contacts with them.

 

The commission will also investigate and track where the pigeons came from, it said.

Meanwhile, the agency ordered the closure of the live poultry trading areas of two markets in Minhang district after samples there were found with H7 bird flu virus.

(Continue . . . )

 

 

You may recall that it was the controversial decision by Margaret Chan to cull all of the poultry in Hong Kong in 1997 that was credited with eventually stopping the first outbreak of H5N1 in its tracks. 

 

In that case, the H5N1 bird flu virus was more geographically contained. We currently have reports of H7N9 cases from multiple cities across three provinces, which will make culling operations more difficult.

 

It is unknown at this time where or how the pigeons that tested positive in the Shanghai market contracted the virus, or how many of the human infections are due to poultry exposure.

 

Whether this virus has found a home in the wild bird population, or other host animals (like pigs, rodents, or other small mammals) is likewise an open question.

 

Until the actual sources and modes of transmission of this virus are better understood, containment and eradication strategies such as culling may only prove partially successful.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Bird Flu Spreading In West Bengal

 

 


# 4272

 

 

 

With few changes, the story below is one we might have seen last year, or even the year before.    H5N1 outbreaks in West Bengal have become a regular event during the winter months.

 

And almost as predictable as the outbreaks themselves, is the (understandable but unwise) resistance by villagers to culling, and allegations of mismanaged compensation programs.

 

Based on a news report from a week ago (see Culling To Begin In Murshidabad) this outbreak began with poultry deaths on or about January 5th.  

 

A fair and properly administered culling compensation program is essential for any developing country that hopes to contain their bird flu problems.   And along with that must go aggressive public education on the signs, symptoms, and dangers of bird flu.

 

While a handful of chickens in backyard coops may not seem like much, to many of these villagers it represents a substantial portion of their financial and food security for their families.

 

Whether the allegations of financial mismanagement have merit or not, the delays in completing culling present an opportunity for the virus to continue to spread.

 

This report from the Indian Express.

 

 

As bird flu strikes again, villagers oppose culling

Ravik Bhattacharya

Thursday , Jan 21, 2010 at 0349 hrs Kolkata:

As bird flu strikes again in Bengal, the state government seems struggling to contain the outbreak.

 

The outbreak, which started in Khargram block in Murshidabad, has already spread to the neighbouring Kandhi block. The villagers have demanded an increase in compensation and alleged that they are yet to receive aid for the 2008 outbreak.

 

These include villagers from Borowan, Mahisar, Baliya, Kirtipur, Parulia, Khargram and Jaipur.

 

As culling teams visited Borowan on Tuesday, locals stopped them from taking away their hens and ducks. Despite police escorts, the teams could not enter the villages. There are 59 culling teams working in the area, most of whom have been given police escorts.

(Continue . . . )

Sunday, January 17, 2010

West Bengal Update

 

 

# 4264

 

 


My thanks to Carol@SC on the Flu Wiki for posting this updated status report on the culling operations ongoing in West Bengal. 

 

As you may recall, on Friday we learned that some of the poultry deaths in Murshidabad, West Bengal had been confirmed as stemming from the H5N1 virus.

 

Over the past couple of weeks more than 1,000 chickens and ducks had reportedly died.

 

The following comes for the Government of India’s Press Information Bureau.

 

 

Status Report on Avian Influenza outbreak in West Bengal

(16.01.2010)


 

• Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries (DADF), GOI has notified Avian Influenza outbreak in Hazrabati and Nagar villages [block Khargram], district Murshidabad on 14th January, 2010.


• A three member Central Rapid Response Team of MOHFW has been deputed to assist the state health authorities.


• Containment measures have been initiated as per the contingency plan of DADF. Culling of birds has started and so far 3209 birds have been culled.


• 197 poultry workers involved in culling operations have been put on chemoprophylaxis.


• The micro-planning for active surveillance has been done. Surveillance activities have started in 0-3 Km. Out of a total population of 40,266 (spread over 23 villages), 36,514 has been covered on 16.01.10. 19 cases of URI / fever have been identified in the community but had no exposure history to sick/dead poultry.


• The identified hospital has reported 36 cases of fever with URI but none of them have history of contact with infected poultry.


• State Govt. has adequate stock of oseltamivir and personal protective equipment. The affected district has 6610 oseltamivir capsules, 304 PPE and ninety N-95 masks in its stock.