Showing posts with label H1N1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label H1N1. Show all posts

Thursday, March 12, 2015

India Media Report: NIV Denies Mutations In H1N1

image

 

# 9816

 

Yesterday, in contrast to recent government denials (see No mutation of H1N1), we looked at an analysis by MIT: Genetic Changes In A 2014 Indian H1N1pdm09 Virus, that the authors offered as an possible explanation for the reportedly severe H1N1 season India is experiencing this winter (see press release Analysis suggests a more virulent swine flu virus in the Indian subcontinent).

 

Today, media reports are carrying denials by India’s National Institute of Virology in Pune.

 

This debate could be quickly settled were India to sequence, and make available, a comprehensive and representative sampling of recent flu isolates.  But according to the MIT article, only two samples have been deposited over the past year, and one of those was the subject of their analysis.

 

No evidence to suggest swine flu virus has mutated: NIV

New Delhi, March 12 (IANS): The National Institute of Virology on Thursday said there was no evidence to suggest that the swine flu virus in India may have mutated.

A study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) conducted by a team of Indian-origin scientists said swine flu has killed over 1,500 people and infected more than 27,000 people in India and the virus has acquired mutations that make it more dangerous than previously circulating strains of H1N1 influenza.

The flu virus in India seems to have acquired mutations that could spread more readily, the MIT scientists warned in the study.

Official sources at the NIV in Pune said the genetic analysis of the H1N1 isolates from the present 2015 outbreak do not show any such mutations as mentioned in the MIT publication.

The observation in the MIT report was based on gene sequence analysed for the H1N1 virus taken from a database and not from actual virus isolates from the current 2015 outbreak, the NIV sources said.

(Continue . . . )

Saturday, February 21, 2015

India’s H1N1 Outbreak

image 

Flu Strain Surveillance February 5th 2015  - Credit WHO

 

# 9735


While North America and most of Europe have been dealing almost exclusively with a `drifted’ H3N2 dominated flu season, parts of the Middle East and much of the Indian sub-continent have seen more of the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus this winter.

 

By nearly all accounts, essentially the same H1N1 virus that emerged in 2009, and that we saw return in the 2013-14 flu season.


Once considered a `pandemic’ flu, H1N1 is now viewed as a seasonal strain of influenza – and while it tends to strike a younger cohort than does H3N2 – it often produces a `milder’  overall flu season than H3. 

 

In the Indian press, however, H1N1 is still widely regarded as `swine flu’  or `pig flu’, and it isn’t unusual to see a heightened level of `urgency’ in their reporting on the virus.  This is ground we’ve trod before.

 

In 2012 (India’s last H1N1-heavy flu season) we saw a flurry of newspapers headlines (see Indian Expert: `Nothing Scary About Outbreak’), claiming government cover-ups of huge numbers of `swine flu’ deaths, and speculation that some (unidentified) `mutation’ in the H1N1 virus has revived its ferocity.


So prevalent were these stories that the Indian government issued a flat denial in April of 2012.

 

No Cause for panic about Pandemic Influenza A H1N1

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

11-April, 2012 13:53 IST

The situation with respect to instances of H1N1 is well under control and is being monitored. As reported in some section of the press, the virus has not mutated to a more virulent form or changed its character.

(Continue . . .)

 

After a relatively quiet 2013-14 flu season, India is once again reporting high numbers of H1N1 cases and deaths, and the Indian and International press are giving it a lot of coverage.

 

Swine Flu Outbreak Kills 700 in India – Time

40 more deaths due to swine flu; number of cases cross 11000 mark - International-Times of India-Feb 19, 2015

Indian health officials urge calm as swine flu outbreak spreads – Al Jazeera

 

Although the numbers seem high (and undoubtedly represent only the smallest tip of much larger iceberg), in a nation of 1.25 billion people – tens of millions would be expected to contract the flu in an average year - and of those, tens of thousands would likely die.  

 

So it isn’t at all clear at this point that anything unusual is going on with the H1N1 virus in India. 

 

Despite persistent rumors to the contrary , India’s National Institute of Virology (NIV) and their National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) both report No mutation of H1N1. That said, the  Health Ministry issued the following statement earlier this week, pledging an investigation.

 

Health Ministry on H1N1: Closely monitoring the situation; no shortage of drugs

 

 

As we’ve seen previously, India’s free-wheeling press isn’t shy about using infectious disease concerns to embarrass or discredit  local officials and even political parties. Over the past couple of days the Mayor of Mumbai and West Bengal’s Chief Minister have both come under fire for making what are – admittedly – some very strange assertions regarding the flu virus.

 

This from NDTV.

After Mamata Banerjee Thought it's Mosquito-Borne, Mumbai Mayor Calls Swine Flu a 'Heart Disease'

Mumbai | Veer Arjun Singh (with inputs from PTI) | Updated: February 19, 2015 23:19 IST

 

At the time when swine flu cases in the country have crossed 10,000 mark, Mumbai Mayor Snehal Ambekar today called it a "heart disease" and made a bizarre suggestion that the municipal authority will plant trees to check the disease.

"Swine flu is a heart disease... Hence, BMC will plant trees, develop gardens and parks to check swine flu," Ms Ambekar told reporters after garlanding the statue of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj on the occassion of his birth anniversary in Mumbai today.

The blooper from Ms Ambedkar comes a day after West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee was quoted saying that swine flu "mostly happens from mosquito bite".

(Continue . . .)

 

 

While it is always possible that the H1N1 virus could pick up changes that could make it more virulent as it passages through millions of hosts, this particular virus has proven remarkably stable since it emerged in the spring of 2009.

 

So much so that the A/California/7/2009-like virus is the same strain used in flu vaccines today. 

 

At some point A(H1N1) will drift antigenically enough as to render the old vaccine strain obsolete. The hallmark of flu viruses is that they eventually change, and H1N1 is no exception.

 

And while the concern is we’ll see a more virulent virus emerge, there is nothing that says H1N1 couldn’t just as easily evolve into a less virulent strain

 

Although India’s press reports on H1N1 are easy to dismiss based on their obvious hyperbole and oft times inaccurate description of the virus, anytime you have a large outbreak of flu it is worth keeping an eye on it.  

Thursday, June 19, 2014

A Plethora Of Pathogens, Even During A Pandemic

image

Photo Credit CDC Influenza Home Care Guide

 

Keypoints

  • New study found H1N1pdm virus among a small minority of samples tested during the opening weeks of the 2009 Pandemic in New South Wales

 

# 8762

 

During the opening days, weeks and months of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, just about anyone who came down with an influenza-like Illness (ILI) was convinced they had contracted  the dreaded `swine flu’. It was, after all, featured on just about every newscast, some governments were handing out antivirals based on symptoms alone, and there were daily dire warnings about its global spread.

 

But during the pandemic, just as we see during every flu season, influenza isn’t the only respiratory virus in circulation.  That terrible `flu’ you think you had last year? 

Well, it may have been something else, entirely.

 

During the fall of 2009, at the height of the H1N1 pandemic in the United States, I highlighted the following CDC graphic in a blog called ILI’s Aren’t Always The Flu, that showed that 70% of the samples taken from symptomatic patients tested negative for influenza.

image

 

While we tend to think of influenza as the `severe’ respiratory virus, and all of the others as milder, that isn’t always the case.  Again, during the fall of 2009, we saw reports indicating that a large number of `non-influenza’ severe respiratory infections were treated at Philadelphia’s Children’s Hospital.

 

Thu, Nov. 12, 2009

Tests show fall outbreak is rhinovirus, not swine flu

By Don Sapatkin

Inquirer Staff Writer

(EXCERPT)

Tests at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia suggest that large numbers of people who got sick this fall actually fell victim to a sudden, unusually severe - and continuing - outbreak of rhinovirus, better known as a key cause of the common cold.

Experts say it is logistically and financially impossible to test everyone with flulike symptoms. And signs, treatment, and prognoses for a bad cold and a mild flu are virtually identical, so the response hardly differs.

(Continue . . .)

 

And the same is true every flu season. Common respiratory viruses include metapneumovirus, parainfluenzavirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, or most likely, one of the myriad Rhinoviruses (Common cold).

 

Something that Dr. Ian Mackay has addressed well, and often, in the past.  The following chart comes from his recent blogs on the topic; Respiratory viruses: the viruses we detect in the human respiratory tract:

image

 

All of which serves as prelude to a new study, conducted in New South Wales, that examines 255 respiratory samples taken during the opening months of the 2009 pandemic, to try to examine exactly what viruses were present.  The results, as you have probably already ascertained, were heavily weighted towards `non-influenza’ viruses.

 

Pandemic clinical case definitions are non-specific: multiple respiratory viruses circulating in the early phases of the 2009 influenza pandemic in New South Wales, Australia

Vigneswary Mala Ratnamohan, Janette Taylor, Frank Zeng, Kenneth McPhie, Christopher C Blyth, Sheena Adamson, Jen Kok and Dominic E Dwyer

Virology Journal 2014, 11:113  doi:10.1186/1743-422X-11-113

Published: 18 June 2014

Abstract (provisional)

Background

During the early phases of the 2009 pandemic, subjects with influenza-like illness only had laboratory testing specific for the new A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.

Findings: Between 25th May and 7th June 2009, during the pandemic CONTAIN phase, A(H1N1)pdm09 virus was detected using nucleic acid tests in only 56 of 1466 (3.8%) samples meeting the clinical case definition required for A(H1N1)pdm09 testing. Two hundred and fifty-five randomly selected A(H1N1)pdm09 virus-negative samples were tested for other respiratory viruses using a real-time multiplex PCR assay. Of the 255 samples tested, 113 (44.3%) had other respiratory viruses detected: rhinoviruses 63.7%, seasonal influenza A 17.6%, respiratory syncytial virus 7.9%, human metapneumovirus 5.3%, parainfluenzaviruses 4.4%, influenza B virus 4.4%, and enteroviruses 0.8%. Viral co-infections were present in 4.3% of samples.

Conclusions

In the very early stages of a new pandemic, limiting testing to only the novel virus will miss other clinically important co-circulating respiratory pathogens.

 

The entire study is available as a PDF at this link.    I’ve excerpted the last two paragraphs from the study below:

 

Even  prior  to  the  widespread  transmission  of  A(H1N1)pdm09  virus  in  Australia,  limiting testing to travellers did not improve the specificity of testing. Furthermore, if laboratories use NAT  to  determine  other  causes  of  infection,  testing  capacity  in  an  outbreak  may  soon  be reached. However, when the causative pathogen of an outbreak has been  identified and the outbreak  has  progressed  beyond  containment,  then  the  testing  algorithms  need  revision  to target  only  specific  indications,  such  as  a  location  of  new  or  significant  clusters,  or  for individuals at risk of severe disease.


In  conclusion,  laboratory  testing  specifically  targeting  only  the  new  virus  will  miss  other clinically  important  co-circulating  respiratory  pathogens  in  the  very  early  stages  of  a pandemic. Detecting the presence of other viruses may provide important information on the impact of pre-existing viruses when a new pandemic virus is circulating.

 

 

It should be noted that the 2009 H1N1 pandemic began when the northern hemisphere’s flu season was coming to an end, and the southern hemisphere’s flu season was just getting started.

 

One can’t automatically assume that the same sorts of ratios would have prevailed in regions where other viruses were circulating less frequently. Interestingly, the rate of H1N1pdm positive tests may very well have been dampened in the Southern Hemisphere by the co-circulation of some of these other viruses. 

 

A topic that Ian Mackay explored earlier this week in  Influenza in Queensland, Australia: 1-Jan (Week 1) to 8-June (Week 23); the idea that the body’s immune response to one viral infection may temporarily protect you against infection from another. 

 

And an idea similar to one we looked at back in 2010 in  Eurosurveillance: The Temporary Immunity Hypothesis  (and again, in 2012 in EID Journal: Revisiting The `Canadian Problem’.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Cell Host & Microbe: 1918-like Avian Viruses Circulating In Birds Have Pandemic Potential

image

BSL-4 Lab Worker - Photo Credit –USAMRIID  

 

 

# 8730

 

Last year, in H2N2: What Went Around, Could Come Around Again, we looked at a cautionary report from researchers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital that warned that avian H2N2 viruses – similar to the one that sparked the 1957 pandemic – continue to circulate in the avian species.

 

Those born after 1968 – when H2N2 was supplanted in the human population by the H3N2 virus – are likely to have little immunity to an H2 flu virus, and so concerns remain that the virus could re-emerge as a pandemic.

 

The H1N1 virus – which disappeared for 20 years after H2N2 arrived on the scene – returned in 1976, and has co-existed with H3N2 ever since. Given the near-universal exposure we all have to H1N1, few scientists thought another H1N1 could pose a substantial pandemic risk.  

 

That theory was disposed of when, in 2009, a `new’  H1N1 variant appeared and did just that. 

 

All of which brings us to a new study, published today in Cell Host & Microbe, that begins by looking at the current reservoir of avian flu viruses in the wild for gene segments similar to those found in the deadly 1918 H1N1 pandemic virus. And as you might expect, they found what they were looking for. 

 

Gene segments with a `high homology’ to the 1918 virus still exist in the wild, and given the ability of flu viruses to reassort, may pose a future pandemic risk.

How big that risk is, is unknown.

 

This story gets more complicated, when - in what some scientists consider a risky step -  the researchers assembled their own version of the 1918 pandemic virus using these different gene segments, and proceeded to test it on ferrets.

 

This virus was `close’ to the 1918 version – but not an exact match -  off by a few amino acid substitutions. And so the virus didn’t kill or spread between the ferrets. 

 

These researchers then introduced a small number of mutations (and some arose spontaneously), that increased both the virus’s transmissibility and virulence, making the virus deadly (at least to ferrets).

A press release from the University of Wisconsin-Madison describes the experiment:

 

Genes found in nature yield 1918-like virus with pandemic potential


(EXCERPT)

To assess the risk posed by a virus that could acquire all eight of the 1918-like genes, the team used reverse genetics methods to generate a virus that differed from the 1918 virus by only 3 percent of the amino acids that make the virus proteins. The resulting virus was more pathogenic in mice and ferrets that an ordinary avian flu virus, but was not as pathogenic as the 1918 virus and it did not transmit in ferrets via respiratory droplets, the primary mode of flu transmission.

Since pandemic risk escalates when a virus become transmissible, Kawaoka's group then conducted additional experiments to determine how many changes would be required for the avian 1918-like virus to become transmissible in ferrets, a well accepted model for influenza transmission studies. The researchers identified seven mutations in three viral genes that enabled the pathogen to transmit as efficiently as the 1918 virus. The resulting virus, composed of genetic factors circulating in wild and domesticated birds, demonstrates that the genetic ingredients for a potentially deadly and pandemic pathogen exist in nature and could combine to form such a virus, according to Kawaoka.

<SNIP>

The transmission studies were conducted under specially designed high-containment conditions, using commensurate biosafety practices, at UW-Madison with approval of the university's Institutional Biosafety Committee. The draft manuscript was reviewed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), in keeping with the institute's implementation of the United States Government Policy for Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern.

(Continue . . . )

First, the link to the article, then I’ll have a little bit more on the controversy that surrounds Gain of Function (GOF) research. 

 

Circulating Avian Influenza Viruses Closely Related to the 1918 Virus Have Pandemic Potential

Tokiko Watanabe12,Gongxun Zhong12, Colin A. Russell12 , Noriko Nakajima , Masato Hatta , Anthony Hanson ,  Ryan McBride , David F. Burke , Kenta Takahashi ,  Satoshi Fukuyama ,  Yuriko Tomita ,  Eileen A. Maher ,  Shinji Watanabe , Masaki Imai ,  Gabriele Neumann ,  Hideki Hasegawa ,  James C. Paulson ,  Derek J. Smith ,  Yoshihiro Kawaoka

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.006

Highlights

  • •Current circulating avian flu viruses encode proteins similar to the 1918 virus
  • •A 1918-like virus composed of avian influenza virus segments was generated
  • •The 1918-like virus is more pathogenic in mammals than an authentic avian flu virus
  • •Seven amino acid substitutions were sufficient to confer transmission in ferrets

(Continue . . . )

Despite the safety precautions taken, there is considerable concern among some in the scientific community over the safety of these so called `gain of function’ (GOF) experiments, and that has led to increasingly heated exchanges and increasing polarization in academia.

 

Proponents argue that these experiments can help us discover what strains have the most pandemic potential, and could help in the early development of a vaccine.  Opponents argue that these potential benefits are overstated, and the risks of an accidental release from the lab are too great.

 

This is an area where reputable – indeed, world renown – scientists and researchers do not agree. I’ve covered both sides of this issue previously, including:

 

Lipsitch & Galvani: GOF Research Concerns

Laurie Garrett On Biosecurity Reforms

H7N9: Reigniting The `Gain Of Function’ Research Debate

mbio Science Should Be in the Public Domain

 

Unfortunately, despite considerable debate over this issue, we seem no closer to a consensus than we were two and half years ago when fate of the Fouchier H5N1 Ferret studies was still on the table. Worse, the long promised `thorough public discussion of the risks and benefits involved; has yet to happen in any substantive way. 

 

We seem to have reached a sort of equilibrium, an uneasy state of status quo on this issue, where nothing really changes.

 

Which pretty much assures that a month, perhaps two from now, we’ll likely see another controversial GOF study released, followed by another round of criticism and concern.  Ad infinitum.

 

Perhaps not the worst possible state of affairs, but it does tend  to make a mockery of the phrase `scientific progress’.

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Atypical Influenza (H5N1,H7N9, pH1N1) Presentations

 

image
Photo Credit CDC

 


# 8162

 

By now, just about everyone has read or heard about the tragic story of the young nurse who died in Canada from the H5N1 virus after returning from a 3-week trip to China. Today ProMed Mail has published a detailed accounting of her signs and symptoms, and clinical treatment, in the days leading up to her death (h/t @HelenBranswell).

 

Due to its length I won’t try to excerpt the report, but will instead invite you to read it in its entirety at http://www.promedmail.org/direct.php?id=2167282, after you return, I’ll have more on atypical flu presentations.

 

When we think of flu, the early symptoms are generally cough, fever, and body aches.   While this patient had a fever, and eventually developed respiratory symptoms (shortness of breath) and pneumonia, she did not initially present with a cough and her overall appearance was not what you would expect with an influenza patient.

 

Her `atypical’ symptoms included chest pain, a mild headache (exacerbated by head movement), right upper quadrant and epigastric pain, and nausea and vomiting.  And so her initial diagnosis was bacterial pneumonia (based on x-rays), and after her neurological signs appeared, meningococcal encephalitis was also considered.

 

Although influenza is primarily thought of as a respiratory infection, in recent years we’ve seen growing evidence that both seasonal and novel flu stains can manifest in a variety of unusual ways.  Neurological and gastrointestinal symptoms – while not typical – are not all that uncommon.

 

So today, a review of some of those reports from the past few years.  As you’ll see, flu comes in many guises, and it isn’t always easy to diagnose.

One of the earliest indications that H5N1 could produce serious (even fatal) non-respiratory illness came from this study involving the deaths of a brother and sister in Vietnam in 2004.

 

Fatal avian influenza A (H5N1) in a child presenting with diarrhea followed by coma.

de Jong MD, Bach VC, Phan TQ, Vo MH, Tran TT, Nguyen BH, Beld M, Le TP, Truong HK, Nguyen VV, Tran TH, Do QH, Farrar J.

Abstract

In southern Vietnam, a four-year-old boy presented with severe diarrhea, followed by seizures, coma, and death. The cerebrospinal fluid contained 1 white cell per cubic millimeter, normal glucose levels, and increased levels of protein (0.81 g per liter). The diagnosis of avian influenza A (H5N1) was established by isolation of the virus from cerebrospinal fluid, fecal, throat, and serum specimens. The patient's nine-year-old sister had died from a similar syndrome two weeks earlier. In both siblings, the clinical diagnosis was acute encephalitis. Neither patient had respiratory symptoms at presentation. These cases suggest that the spectrum of influenza H5N1 is wider than previously thought.

 

In June of 2007, we saw a report (see Atypical Presentations of H5N1) out of Indonesia, of a 3-year old child infected with H5N1 but that presented with fever, but without respiratory symptoms.   Surprising since fever, cough, and in most cases pneumonia, are pretty much a hallmark the H5N1 virus.

 

Gastrointestinal symptoms have been reported in a  number of H5N1 cases as well, as we saw in 2008  in this large review of Chinese bird flu patients (see Clinical Case Review Of 26 Chinese H5N1 Patients).

 

And in 2010, we saw a study (see H5N1 Can Replicate In Human Gut) that provided even more evidence that the bird flu virus can thrive outside the human respiratory system.  From a Journal of Infectious Diseases  brief:  

 

DOI: 10.1086/651457
BRIEF REPORT

Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Viruses Can Directly Infect and Replicate in Human Gut Tissues

Yuelong Shu, Chris Ka‐fai Li, Zi Li, Rongbao Gao, Qian Liang, Ye Zhang, Libo Dong, Jiangfang Zhou, Jie Dong, Dayan Wang, Leying Wen, Ming Wang, Tian Bai, Dexin Li, Xiaoping Dong, Hongjie Yu, Weizhong Yang, Yu Wang,Zijian Feng,  Andrew J. McMichael,3 and Xiao‐Ning Xu3

 

The human respiratory tract is a major site of avian influenza A(H5N1) infection. However, many humans infected with H5N1 present with gastrointestinal tract symptoms, suggesting that this may also be a target for the virus.

 

In this study, we demonstrated that the human gut expresses abundant avian H5N1 receptors, is readily infected ex vivo by the H5N1 virus, and produces infectious viral particles in organ culture.

 

An autopsy colonic sample from an H5N1infected patient showed evidence of viral antigen expression in the gut epithelium. Our results provide the first evidence, to our knowledge, that H5N1 can directly target human gut tissues.

 

In 2009, in Study: H5N1 Infection And Brain Damage, we looked at a story by Maggie Fox – who was then writing for Reuters – on a PNAS study that found the H5N1 virus was neurotropic (able to infect & damage nerve cells) . . . at least in mice.

 

Bird flu causes Alzheimer's-like brain damage, study says

Tests on mice infected with H5N1 virus show lasting damage to nerve cells, including the brain

Maggie Fox

Washington — Reuters News Agency Last updated on Monday, Aug. 10, 2009 05:13PM EDT

Survivors of bird flu, and perhaps other influenza viruses, may not be out of the woods once the fever and cough are gone: Animal studies suggest the virus may damage the brain and cause Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.

The tests on mice show that the H5N1 virus can get into the brain, causing damage that resembles Parkinson's and Alzheimer's in humans, the researchers wrote in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“Our results suggest that a pandemic H5N1 pathogen, or other neurotropic influenza virus, could initiate central nervous system disorders of protein aggregation including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases,” Richard Smeyne of St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, Tenn., and colleagues wrote.

(Continue . . . )

 

Another article on this research, published on the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital website:

 

Avian influenza strain primes brain for Parkinson’s disease

At least one strain of the H5N1 avian influenza virus leaves survivors at significantly increased risk for Parkinson’s disease and possibly other neurological problems later in life, according to new research from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. 

(Continue . . . )

 

This PNAS study (link below) found that the H5N1 virus was highly neurotropic in lab mice, and in the words of the authors `could initiate CNS disorders of protein aggregation including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases’.

Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus can enter the central nervous system and induce neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration

Haeman Jang, David Boltz, Katharine Sturm-Ramirez, Kennie R. Shepherd, Yun Jiao, Robert Webster and Richard J. Smeyne

 

It isn’t just H5N1 that presents in atypical fashion, as we saw last October in CMJ: Varied Clinical Presentations Of H7N9. This study reviewed the case of  an 87 year-old man who initially (April 4th) complained of loss of appetite and strength but no fever, cough, or expectoration

 

Chest x-rays on the 6th indicated some lung inflammation, but due to his symptoms a bacterial, not a viral cause, was suspected.  He admitted to the hospital and was placed on antibiotics (cefuroxime).

 

Five days into his illness, he developed dyspnea (shortness of breath) and an elevated temperature, and on April 10th deteriorated further. Influenza was finally suspected, and he was started on oseltamivir and levofloxacin, and a decision to test for H7N9 was made.

 

Despite ICU treatment, and a transfer to specialized hospital, the patient died on April 21st.

 

The authors wrote:

This case history serves to remind us that we need timely use of antiviral treatment, even for the patients whose clinical manifestations are not typical but whose lung inflammation may be developing rapidly. Careful clinical observation needs to be carried out so that appropriate treatment can begin as early as possible and progression culminating in death is minimized

 

During the opening months of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, we also saw a number of influenza-related encephalopathies.

 

Encephalopathy isn’t a distinct disease, but rather refers to a syndrome of diffuse brain dysfunctions, which may be associated with a variety of causes (including viral, bacterial, trauma, prions, and toxic chemicals).

The overriding hallmark of encephalopathy is an altered mental state, although depending and severity of encephalopathy, common neurological symptoms such as progressive memory loss and changes in cognitive abilitypersonality changes, inability to concentrate, lethargy, seizures and loss of consciousness may be seen.

 

Barely 90 days after the novel H1N1 virus emerged, the CDC’s MMWR reported on 4 pediatric patients with the novel H1N1 virus who presented with neurological symptoms including unexplained seizures and altered mental status:

 

Neurologic Complications Associated with Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Infection in Children --- Dallas, Texas, May 2009

 

Additional reports came in over the summer and fall, particularly from Japan, indicating an unusual number cases of Influenza-related encephalopathy (IAE) among children (see Japan: Influenza Related Encephalopathy).

 

In January of 2010, the CDC’s EID Journal carried a report called Neurologic Manifestations of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Virus Infection and in September, the Annals of Neurology carried a study called Heightened Neurologic Complications in Children with Pandemic H1N1 Influenza that found:

 

The most common neurological complications exhibited with novel H1N1 were seizures (12 patients or 67%), with seven exhibiting status epilepticus, a potentially life-threatening condition involving continuous or recurrent seizures that can last for a half hour or longer.

The mean age of children admitted with neurological symptoms from H1N1 was more than twice the age (6.5 years) than usually seen with seasonal flu (2.4 years).

 

Over the past 15 years Influenza has been increasingly recognized as a rare cause of encephalopathy. For reasons not understood, it is reported most often among children and adolescents in Japan and Taiwan.

 

Another  example of how influenza may impact systems outside of our respiratory tract, in Revisiting The Influenza-Parkinson’s Link we looked at a study conducted by the University of British Columbia, that found a linkage between a past history of severe bouts of influenza and the likelihood of developing Parkinson’s disease later in life.

 

In fact, according to their research, a severe bout of influenza doubles a person’s chances of developing the neurological condition. Interestingly, the UBC researchers found that those who caught red measles as a child were 35% less likely to develop the disabling disease.   

 

The article appears in the journal Movement Disorders, and the abstract may be read at:

 

Association of Parkinson's disease with infections and occupational exposure to possible vectors

M. Anne Harris PhD, Joseph K. Tsui MB, Stephen A. Marion MD, Hui Shen PhD, Kay Teschke PhD

 

 

During the 1918 pandemic, and the decade that followed, more than a million people around the world were afflicted by a mysterious neurological disorder called Encephalitis Lethargica (EL), which some researchers suspect may have been part of some long-term sequelae of the virus.

 

While most researchers now believe that EL and Spanish influenza pandemic were not etiologically linked, in The relationship between encephalitis lethargica and influenza: A critical analysis Sherman McCall, Joel A Vilensky  and Jeffery K Taubenberger looked at both sides of this longstanding debate. 

Quite interestingly, they conclude:

Empirical studies provide little evidence of influenza causation; but, as we have demonstrated, technical limitations and the shortage of appropriate material for testing limit the degree of confidence. Therefore, unless another cause of classical EL is positively identified, its return in the context of another influenza pandemic remains formally possible. Such a recurrence would provide an opportunity to establish the etiology of EL using modern methods.

 

In light of the recent research linking Parkinson’s and influenza, this linkage – while far from proven – would seem at least plausible.

 

As far as where this meandering through the archives leaves us, I suppose it should be with greater respect for such a versatile and highly adaptive virus.  One that can produce such a wide range of symptoms (and severity), both in terms of an acute infection - and potentially - in the form of long term sequelae like Parkinson’s or narcolepsy.

 

Frankly, the longer I blog about influenza, the more impressed I am with its capabilities.

Friday, December 20, 2013

Texas DSHS Statement On Recent Spike In Flu Activity

image

CDC FluView Report  Week 50

# 8096

 

Texas, along with several other southern states,are seeing a sharp increase in influenza activity over the past couple of weeks, as illustrated by the map at the top of this post from today’s CDC FluView

 

Today’s summary from the Texas Weekly Influenza Surveillance report states:

 

Statewide influenza-like illness (ILI) activity continues to increase and is above baseline levels. Influenza activity is increasing steadily. All Texas Regions have reported laboratory confirmed influenza, and the percentage of specimens positive for influenza is over 10%. ILI intensity is high, and influenza is widespread in Texas.

.

As the following graphic shows, not only are the vast majority of flu cases Influenza A, the 2009 (H1N1) virus – which has a history of hitting younger patients particularly hard - is the dominant strain being reported in Texas.

 

image

 

 

Partially as a response to this week’s high profile accounts of severe influenza cases (including fatalities) in and around Montgomery County, Texas (see and the Montgomery County Flu Updates – Dec 19th), and in part due to the statewide increase in influenza, the Texas DSHS  released the following statement this afternoon.  

 

 

Texas Encourages Vigilance in Flu Treatment, Precautions

News Release

Dec. 20, 2013

Though recent increases in flu activity are not unusual, Texas issued flu testing and treatment guidance today to doctors and is continuing to encourage everyone to get vaccinated now to protect themselves.

The level of flu-like illness is classified as “high” in Texas, and medical providers are seeing an increase in flu in multiple parts of the state. Unusually severe cases of flu-like illness are routinely investigated during the flu season by local health departments in coordination with the Texas Department of State Health Services. H1N1 is the most common circulating flu strain so far this season. This year’s flu vaccine includes protection against the most common flu strains, including H1N1.

DSHS advises clinicians to consider antiviral treatment, even if an initial rapid-flu test comes back negative. A negative result does not exclude a diagnosis of flu in a patient with suspected illness. Antiviral treatment is recommended for anyone with confirmed or suspected flu who is hospitalized, has severe or progressive illness or is at a higher risk for complications.

“Given the timing and the season, flu is on the rise and causing severe illness in certain people. This is not unexpected, but it’s a good reminder for people to get vaccinated and stay home if they’re sick,” said Dr. David Lakey, DSHS commissioner. “Flu can be deadly. People who have not been vaccinated should do so now. It’s the best defense we have.”

Flu is a serious disease that kills an average of 23,600 Americans a year, according to estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. People over 65, pregnant women, young children and people with chronic health conditions are most at risk for complications, so it’s especially important for them to be vaccinated.

Flu cases and flu-related deaths in adults are not required to be reported to DSHS. Healthcare providers are required to report pediatric flu deaths to their local health department within one business day. There are no confirmed pediatric flu deaths in Texas this season.

DSHS recommends everyone six months old and older get vaccinated. People should talk to their health care provider about the best type of flu vaccine for them. A nasal spray version is available for healthy people ages 2 to 49 who are not pregnant, and a high-dose vaccine is approved for people 65 and older.

Dr. Lakey also urged people to follow standard illness-prevention steps:

  • Wash hands frequently with soap and water or alcohol-based hand sanitizer;
  • Cover coughs and sneezes;
  • Stay home if sick

-30-

 

While Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, and Georgia are reporting the most intense flu activity right now, even states still shown in green, flu activity is on the rise. Just today, news media in Florida reported on the death of a 27 year old woman from H1N1 in Pasco County.

 

With the holidays ahead, and lots of people mingling and traveling, flu is likely to increase substantially around the nation over the next couple of months.   It is not too late to get a flu shot, and of course, one should always practice good flu hygiene regardless of your vaccination status.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Montgomery County Flu Updates – Dec 19th

image

 

# 8092

 

We’ve a brief statement from the Montgomery County Public Health Department this evening on their ongoing investigation into a number severe `flu-like’ illnesses that now confirms that 2 of the 8 suspect cases have tested positive for the H1N1 virus.  Additional testing is underway.

 

We also have a news story, and some Tweets from the KHOU-TV Managing Editor, that provide additional details not included in the official release.  After which I’ll be back to try to put this into some kind of perspective. 

 


First stop, the MCPH update from their Facebook page.

Contact: Jennifer Nichols-Contella FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Cell: (936) 444-9724 12/19/13
Email:
jnichols@mchd-tx.org


UPDATE - INFLUENZA LIKE ILLNESS ARISES IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY

As of Thursday afternoon, one additional case of H1N1 has been confirmed in Montgomery County. This patient is currently in an area hospital receiving treatment. Labs are being repeated on all remaining cases by the CDC. There are currently two confirmed H1N1 cases in Montgomery County.

The Montgomery County Public Health District is coordinating with regional and state resources to manage the case investigations. Health officials continue to encourage the public to be vaccinated for the flu, especially those who are at high risk.

Montgomery County Public Health District is monitoring the situation closely and will provide more information as it arises.
###

 

Meanwhile KHOU-TV is reporting that doctors now suspect that all eight of the Conroe Medical Center cases are infected with the (new in 2009) H1N1 virus, and that additional severe cases have been reported from two other counties in the region.

H1N1 kills 6 people, leaves 14 critically ill in Greater Houston area

By Jeremy Desel / KHOU 11 News and KHOU.com staff

Posted on December 19, 2013 Updated today at 5:28 PM

HOUSTON – Health officials say there have been six confirmed deaths from H1N1 in the Houston area recently, KHOU 11 News confirmed Thursday afternoon. That includes the four deaths at Conroe Regional Medical Center.

At least 14 people have become critically ill in Harris, Montgomery and Jefferson counties, including the four patients at Conroe Regional Medical Center.

This is the same strain of H1N1 that caused a pandemic in 2009. Doctors have been seeing hundreds of new cases recently in Texas and nationwide. In fact, H1N1 is one of the viruses included in this year’s flu shot.

Health officials from all over the region spent Thursday afternoon in a conference call comparing notes about all the cases. They suspect that all of the cases at the Conroe Regional Medical Center are H1N1, or what used to be called the “swine flu.”

(Continue . . .)

 

In the past couple of hours, Bill Bishop, Managing Editor fro KHOU-TV News has tweeted the following updates from his account.

 

image

 

 

While the 2009 H1N1 virus is no longer a `pandemic’ virus, it – like all seasonal influenza viruses – still has the ability to cause considerable morbidity and mortality.  Last year, we had a fairly serious flu season, but it was dominated by the H3N2 virus – one that traditionally impacts those over the age of 65 the hardest. 

 

And as one would expect, the elderly were particularly hard hit last winter.

 

This year, early reports (see MMWR Update: Influenza Activity — United States, September 29–December 7, 2013) indicate that H1N1 – not H3N2 virus – is the dominant strain in the United States right now.   One of that strain’s characteristics is that it hits younger patients particularly hard.  Here is what the CDC had to say about the impact of the virus during the pandemic.

 

2009 H1N1 Pandemic Hits the Young Especially Hard

This study estimated that 80% of 2009 H1N1 deaths were in people younger than 65 years of age which differs from typical seasonal influenza epidemics during which 80-90% of deaths are estimated to occur in people 65 years of age and older. To illustrate the impact of the shift in the age distribution of influenza deaths to younger age groups during the pandemic, researchers calculated the number of years of life lost due to 2009 H1N1-associated deaths. They estimated that 3 times as many years of life were lost during the first year of 2009 H1N1 virus circulation than would have occurred for the same number of deaths during a typical influenza season.

 

While it may be distressing, it wouldn’t be surprising to see the H1N1 virus causing the same lopsided impact today.  The virus remains antigenically very similar to what emerged in 2009, and for many people who may have not bothered to get a flu shot this year, their immunity levels may be waning.

 

Nor would it be unusual to see a resurgence of a pandemic strain several years after the pandemic has ended.  In fact, that has been the pattern in year’s past.   The chart below shows that type of activity in the six years following the H2N2 pandemic of 1957.  Notice how the mortality rates dropped in 1958-59, and 1960-1962, only to jump again in 1963.

 

image

H2N2  Pandemic Waves - NEJM 2009

 

All of this is a not-so-gentle reminder that seasonal flu can still pack a wallop, and that individual immunities wane over time, making it a good move to update that flu shot every year. It is certainly not too late to get the shot, as we have several months of flu ahead.


I’m sure we’ll revisit this story as more details become available.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

The 2009 H1N1 Virus Expands Its Host Range (Again)

 

image

Credit Wikipedia

 

 

# 7279

 

While we wait for the next shoe to drop with nCoV and H7N9, there are other infectious disease related stories of note – including a UC Davis study, published yesterday in PLoS One, that finds the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus managed to jump to aquatic mammals.

 

As you’ll see, this isn’t the first time that marine mammals have been infected with influenza - but this time - there is considerable mystery attached to how they came to be infected.

 

While we normally think of birds, pigs and humans (and less commonly, horses and dogs) as the normal hosts of influenza viruses, there are other species that have shown the ability acquire and potentially spread certain strains of the virus as well.

 

The (formerly) pandemic H1N1 2009 flu virus has been documented in humans, swine, turkeys, skunks, ferrets, cats, and dogs. While in That Touch Of Mink Flu I wrote about 11 farms in Holstebro, Denmark that were reported to be infected with a variant of the human H3N2 virus.

 

Less commonly reported - camels, whales and seals have all been shown to be susceptible to influenza viruses (cite Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses R.G. Webster et al.)

 

During the winter of 1979-1980 seals were found suffering from pneumonia on the Cape Cod. In that instance, the culprit turned out to be an H7N7 influenza. (see Isolation of an influenza A virus from seals G. Lang, A. Gagnon and J. R. Geraci)

 

In 1984 influenza subtype H4N5 – a strain previously only seen in birds – was determined to be behind the deaths of a number of New England seals in 1982 and 1983 (cite Are seals frequently infected with avian influenza viruses?  R G Webster et al.)

 

And in 1995, in the Journal of General Virology, authors R. J. Callan, G. Early, H. Kida and V. S. Hinshaw wrote of the The appearance of H3 influenza viruses in seals during the early 1990s.

 

Seals have also been shown susceptible to influenza B (cite Influenza B virus in seals. Osterhaus AD, Fouchier , et al.).

 

And more recently, in November of 2011 concerns were raised over the discovery that an influenza A strain  – (eventually identified as avian H3N8) – was infecting and killing seals in New England (see mBio: A Mammalian Adapted H3N8 In Seals).

 

So there is ample precedent for finding influenza viruses in marine mammals, but this marks the first time that a human pandemic strain has been found in one. 

 

Given that Elephant seals can reach colossal size (bulls can exceed 14ft in length and 5,000 lbs), they can be territorial and aggressive, and they spend 80% of their lives at sea, these marine mammals have very few opportunities for direct human contact.

 

Which leads to the question of just how these seals managed to acquire the virus?

 

First a link to the open access study, then some excerpts from the UC Davis press release, then I’ll be back with a little more.

 

Research Article

Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Isolated from Free-Ranging Northern Elephant Seals in 2010 off the Central California Coast

Tracey Goldstein equal contributor mail, Ignacio Mena equal contributor, Simon J. Anthony, Rafael Medina, Patrick W. Robinson, Denise J. Greig, Daniel P. Costa, W. Ian Lipkin, Adolfo Garcia-Sastre, Walter M. Boyce

bstract

Interspecies transmission of influenza A is an important factor in the evolution and ecology of influenza viruses. Marine mammals are in contact with a number of influenza reservoirs, including aquatic birds and humans, and this may facilitate transmission among avian and mammalian hosts.

Virus isolation, whole genome sequencing, and hemagluttination inhibition assay confirmed that exposure to pandemic H1N1 influenza virus occurred among free-ranging Northern Elephant Seals (Mirounga angustirostris) in 2010. Nasal swabs were collected from 42 adult female seals in April 2010, just after the animals had returned to the central California coast from their short post-breeding migration in the northeast Pacific. Swabs from two seals tested positive by RT-PCR for the matrix gene, and virus was isolated from each by inoculation into embryonic chicken eggs. Whole genome sequencing revealed greater than 99% homology with A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) that emerged in humans from swine in 2009.

Analysis of more than 300 serum samples showed that samples collected early in 2010 (n = 100) were negative and by April animals began to test positive for antibodies against the pH1N1 virus (HI titer of ≥1:40), supporting the molecular findings. In vitro characterizations studies revealed that viral replication was indistinguishable from that of reference strains of pH1N1 in canine kidney cells, but replication was inefficient in human epithelial respiratory cells, indicating these isolates may be elephant seal adapted viruses.

 

Thus findings confirmed that exposure to pandemic H1N1 that was circulating in people in 2009 occurred among free-ranging Northern Elephant Seals in 2010 off the central California coast. This is the first report of pH1N1 (A/Elephant seal/California/1/2010) in any marine mammal and provides evidence for cross species transmission of influenza viruses in free-ranging wildlife and movement of influenza viruses between humans and wildlife.

From UC Davis, a link to a press release, and a few excerpts.

 

H1N1 discovered in marine mammals

May 15, 2013

Scientists at the University of California, Davis, detected the H1N1 (2009) virus in free-ranging northern elephant seals off the central California coast a year after the human pandemic began, according to a study published today, May 15, in the journal PLOS ONE. It is the first report of that flu strain in any marine mammal.

 

“We thought we might find influenza viruses, which have been found before in marine mammals, but we did not expect to find pandemic H1N1,” said lead author Tracey Goldstein, an associate professor with the UC Davis One Health Institute and Wildlife Health Center. “This shows influenza viruses can move among species.”

 

<SNIP>

 

“H1N1 was circulating in humans in 2009,” said Goldstein. “The seals on land in early 2010 tested negative before they went to sea, but when they returned from sea in spring 2010, they tested positive. So the question is where did it come from?”

(Continue . . . )

 

For now that question remains unanswered. 

 

There is speculation that seabirds might have carried the virus from land out to sea where these seals may have been exposed, or that discharge from cruise ships may have been involved. 

 

But these are merely guesses.

 

As to why this might be important?  

 

Regular readers of this blog are aware that avian influenza strains bind preferentially to the kind of receptor cells commonly found in the digestive and respiratory tracts of birds; alpha 2,3 receptor cells.

 

Human (and mammalian adapted) influenzas – on the other hand - bind to the kind of receptor cells that line the surfaces of the human upper respiratory system; alpha 2,6 receptor cells.

 

It turns out that some seals – like pigs – have both types of receptor cells (cite).

 

If infected by two different strains simultaneously, they could potentially act as a `mixing vessel’ for influenza strains, and produce a hybrid (reassorted) virus. 

 

image

 

The operative word being `potentially’. No one really knows how big a threat any of this really poses. We’ve no evidence of any influenza epidemic ever originating from aquatic mammals.

 

But the authors of yesterday’s study – via the press release – warn:

 

The findings are particularly pertinent to people who handle marine mammals, such as veterinarians and animal rescue and rehabilitation workers, Goldstein said.

 

They are also a reminder of the importance of wearing personal protective gear when working around marine mammals, both to prevent workers’ exposure to diseases, as well as to prevent the transmission of human diseases to animals.

 

With each passing year we learn more about about just how versatile, variable, and incredibly adaptable influenza viruses really are.

 

A trend that virtually guarantees plenty of avenues of new research for years to come.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Research: Antiviral Resistance In 2009 H1N1 Influenza A Strain

 

image

 

# 7014

 

 

Readers with good memories will recall that in December of 2011, in NEJM: Oseltamivir Resistant H1N1 in Australia, we looked at a cluster of oseltamivir (Tamiflu ®) resistant H1N1 viruses in and around the Newcastle area of New South Wales.

 

The lead author of that NEJM correspondence was Aeron C. Hurt, Ph.D. from the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.  

 

What Hurt and his colleagues found was evidence for the sustained community transmission of a resistant strain of the H1N1pdm09 virus.

 

After analyzing viral samples pulled from 182 patients seen in emergency departments, intensive care units, and doctor’s offices in New South Wales between May and August of 2011, they found 29 (16%) carried the H275Y resistance mutation.

 

H275Y is where a single amino acid substitution (histidine (H) to tyrosine (Y)) occurs at the neuraminidase position 275

  • (Note: some scientists use 'N2 numbering' (H274Y) and some use 'N1 numbering' (H275Y)).

Most of the patients lived within 50km of Newcastle, and while 10 of the cases could be epidemiologically linked (2 in 4 households, 2 in a shared car trip), the rest could not.

 

Only one had been treated with oseltamivir prior to testing.

 

 

While globally the percentage of Tamiflu resistant H1N1 viruses remains low (about 2%), it does appear to be increasing.

 

Today, Dr. Hurt will present his research at ASID (Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases) in Canberra, where he will warn of the dangers of growing resistance (see MedPage Today article Tamiflu Resistance May Be Rising).


Should the incidence of resistant H1N1 increase, it would not be without precedent.

 

Not too many years ago Amantadine (an M2 ion channel blocker) was the preferred influenza antiviral.  It was cheap, plentiful, and effective. But by the mid 2000s Amantadine began to lose its ability to combat the H3N2 seasonal flu virus along with some strains of the H5N1 bird flu.

 

It has been suggested that the prophylactic use of Amantadine by Chinese poultry farmers (who supposedly included it in their chicken feed for several years) may have contributed to this sudden resistance.

 

But whatever the cause, by January of 2006 the CDC had issued a warning to doctors not to rely on Amantadine (or Rimantadine) to treat influenza.

 

Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) – a newer neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor drug  introduced in 1999 - while far more expensive, became the new treatment standard. But by 2008 seasonal H1N1 began to show growing resistance to Oseltamivir as well (although H3N2 remained sensitive).

 

By the spring of 2009, - in the space of just about a  year seasonal H1N1 had gone from almost 100% sensitive to the drug to nearly 100% resistant.

The arrival of the novel 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus was a game changer, in that it – unlike seasonal H1N1 – was still sensitive to oseltamivir. Since then, we’ve been watching to see if – like its predecessor – learns to evade oseltamivir as well.

 

So far, the news is good; resistance in the (formerly pandemic) 2009 H1N1 strain remains rare. 

 

But pharmacological victories over constantly evolving viruses (and bacteria) tend to be fleeting, and so the need for new classes of antivirals and antibiotics is great.

Tuesday, February 05, 2013

PLoS One: Influenza-Associated Encephalopathy

 

image

6-fold spike in encephalopathy during 2009 Pandemic Credit PLoS One

 

# 6908

 

While not viewed as having been a particularly severe pandemic, the 2009 H1N1 virus nonetheless caused serious, and sometimes fatal illness in a small percentage of patients.

 

And it did so in some pretty remarkable ways.

 

Seasonal influenza is primarily seen as a `harvester’ of the aged and infirmed, robbing its victims of the last few months or years of life, and only rarely does it seriously impact young adults and children.

 

Yet, in  Study: Years Of Life Lost Due To 2009 Pandemic, we saw the mean age of death from the 2009 H1N1 virus to be half that of seasonal flu, or 37.4 years

 

Severe lung injury, not normally seen with seasonal influenza, was also reported in a very small number of patients as well. We saw scattered reports during the summer and fall of 2009 (see Pathology Of Fatal H1N1 Lung Infections), but it wasn’t until December that the NIH: Post Mortem Studies Of H1N1 showed:

 

New York Autopsies Show 2009 H1N1 Influenza Virus Damages Entire Airway

In fatal cases of 2009 H1N1 influenza, the virus can damage cells throughout the respiratory airway, much like the viruses that caused the 1918 and 1957 influenza pandemics, report researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner.

(Continue . . .)

 

It was also widely reported (see Pregnancy & Flu: A Bad Combination) during the 2009 pandemic that pregnant women were up to 6 times more likely to be hospitalized with influenza than were non-pregnant women.

 

While many of these complications made headlines, somewhat less well publicized was the neurological impact this virus had on young children.

 

Barely 90 days after the novel H1N1 virus emerged, the CDC’s MMWR reported on 4 pediatric patients with the novel H1N1 virus who presented with neurological symptoms including unexplained seizures and altered mental status:

 

Neurologic Complications Associated with Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Infection in Children --- Dallas, Texas, May 2009

 

Additional reports came in, particularly from Japan, indicating an unusual number cases of Influenza-related encephalopathy (IAE) among children (see Japan: Influenza Related Encephalopathy).

 

Encephalopathy isn’t a distinct disease, but rather refers to a syndrome of diffuse brain dysfunctions, which may be associated with a variety of causes (including viral, bacterial, trauma, prions, and toxic chemicals).

The overriding hallmark of encephalopathy is an altered mental state, although depending and severity of encephalopathy, common neurological symptoms such as progressive memory loss and changes in cognitive abilitypersonality changes, inability to concentrate, lethargy, seizures and loss of consciousness may be seen.

 

Over the past 15 years Influenza has been increasingly recognized as a rare cause of encephalopathy. For reasons not really known, is reported most often among children and adolescents in Japan and Taiwan.

 

In January of 2010, the CDC’s EID Journal carried a report called Neurologic Manifestations of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Virus Infection and in September, the Annals of Neurology carried a study called Heightened Neurologic Complications in Children with Pandemic H1N1 Influenza that found:

The study looked at 303 children hospitalized with the pandemic H1N1 virus, of which 18 developed neurological symptoms.

  

They compared these cases to records of 234 children admitted to the hospital in previous years due to seasonal influenza.

 

The most common neurological complications exhibited with novel H1N1 were seizures (12 patients or 67%), with seven exhibiting status epilepticus, a potentially life-threatening condition involving continuous or recurrent seizures that can last for a half hour or longer.

 

The mean age of children admitted with neurological symptoms from H1N1 was more than twice the age (6.5 years) than usually seen with seasonal flu (2.4 years).

 

All of which serves as prelude to a research article that recently appeared in PloS One, that examined the rate of influenza-related encephalopathy in Japan across 6 flu seasons, including the 2009 pandemic.

 

National Surveillance of Influenza-Associated Encephalopathy in Japan over Six Years, before and during the 2009–2010 Influenza Pandemic

Yoshiaki Gu mail, Tomoe Shimada, Yoshinori Yasui, Yuki Tada, Mitsuo Kaku, Nobuhiko Okabe

 

Abstract (reparagraphed)

Influenza-associated encephalopathy (IAE) is a serious complication of influenza and is reported most frequently in Japan. This paper presents an assessment of the epidemiological characteristics of influenza A (H1N1) 2009-associated encephalopathy in comparison to seasonal IAE, based on Japanese national surveillance data of influenza-like illness (ILI) and IAE during flu seasons from 2004–2005 through 2009–2010.

 

In each season before the pandemic, 34–55 IAE cases (mean 47.8; 95% confidence interval: 36.1–59.4) were reported, and these cases increased drastically to 331 during the 2009 pandemic (6.9-fold the previous seasons).

 

Of the 331 IAE cases, 322 cases were reported as influenza A (H1N1) 2009-associated encephalopathy. The peaks of IAE were consistent with the peaks of the influenza epidemics and pandemics.

 

A total of 570 cases of IAE (seasonal A, 170; seasonal B, 50; influenza A (H1N1) 2009, 322; unknown, 28) were reported over six seasons. The case fatality rate (CFR) ranged from 4.8 to 18.2% before the pandemic seasons and 3.6% in the 2009 pandemic season. The CFR of pandemic-IAE was 3.7%, which is lower than that of influenza A−/B-associated encephalopathy (12.9%, p<0.001; 14.0%, p = 0.002; respectively).

 

The median age of IAE was 7 years during the pandemic, which is higher than that of influenza A−/B-associated encephalopathy (4, p<0.001; 4.5, p = 0.006; respectively).

 

However, the number of pandemic-IAE cases per estimated ILI outpatients peaked in the 0–4-year age group and data both before and during the pandemic season showed a U-shape pattern. This suggests that the high incidence of influenza infection in the 0–4 year age group may lead to a high incidence of IAE in the same age group in a future influenza season.

 

Further studies should include epidemiologic case definitions and clinical details of IAE to gain a more accurate understanding of the epidemiologic status of IAE.

 

 

This is a detailed, and interesting, analysis that finds that in addition to a 6 fold increase in cases during the pandemic, that (like the Annals of Neurology Study mentioned above) the median age of reported encephalopathy was twice that normally seen during other flu seasons.

 

The CFR (Case Fatality Ratio) of encephalopathy cases during the pandemic dropped, however, which the authors ascribe to `improved quality of diagnosis and treatment’.

 

Some of the 6-fold increase in IAE cases during the 2009 pandemic can probably be linked to increased public awareness and medical surveillance.  Cases of mild IAE might have been transient, and not picked up by medical authorities during other flu seasons. 

 

But when added to the other reports we’ve seen, the 2009 H1N1 virus does appear to have had some unusual properties.  The authors conclude by writing:

 

In summary, national surveillance of AE in Japan revealed a steep increase in IAE cases during the 2009–2010 pandemic season. This was likely due to the large number of children infected with influenza during the pandemic, but social attention and information bias might have affected epidemiology data. Results of the present study revealed a relatively low CFR despite a large number of reported IAE cases during the pandemic. One of the characteristic findings was the age distribution of the reported IAE cases. Further studies should include strict epidemiologic case definitions, clinical details including medication history, and epidemiological information of IAE for a more accurate understanding of the epidemiologic status of IAE.

 

 

Nearly 4 years since the emergence of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, A/H1N109pdm is probably the most studied flu virus in history. While it did not end up being a particularly deadly pandemic virus, it has consistently yielded surprises.

 

  • This was the first seasonal flu shown to infect both dogs and cats (see EID Journal: Pandemic H1N1 Infection In Cats) and showed up in such diverse animal hosts as turkeys and ferrets.
  • Novel H1N1 also appears to differ from seasonal flu in how it is transmitted, at least according to researchers in Hong Kong who discovered that the novel H1N1 virus – unlike seasonal flu – easily infects and replicates in the conjunctival tissues of the eye  (see I Only Have Eyes For Flu).
  • And rather than completely supplanting the existing seasonal influenza A strains as we saw in the 1918, 1957 and 1968 pandemics, the 2009 pandemic virus now co-circulates with H3N2 (it did replace seasonal H1N1).

 

While some of these studies may seem a bit esoteric and limited in scope or impact, the knowledge we gain from them can hopefully prove an advantage to us the next time the world faces an emerging viral threat.