Credit CDC Antigenic Characterization
#18,979
While every distinct HPAI H5 clade/subclade/subtype - and sometimes variants within these groups - can pose a different risk to human health, the emergence of a a `mammalian adapted' bovine B3.13 genotype in the United States nearly 2 years ago sent alarm bells ringing.
So far, most human infections (≈ 40) with this bovine genotype have been mild, presenting with conjunctivitis and mild flu-like symptoms, while we've seen 2 deaths (1 from U.S., 1 from Mexico) from a smaller number of genotype D1.1 H5N1 human infections.
Although there are some known virulence factors we look for, exactly what makes D1.1 more aggressive than B3.13 isn't exactly known. Nor can we predict the future trajectory of these two genotypes, or what new variants or subtypes may emerge in the months ahead.
Last summer, in CDC A(H5N1) Update: Population Immunity to A(H5N1) clade 2.3.3.4b Viruses, the CDC reported finding extremely low to no population immunity, even among those who recently received a seasonal flu vaccine.
Other studies have suggested there may be low levels of immunity due to repeated (or childhood) exposure to H1N1 (or H2N2) (see Preprint: Population Immunity to HPAI 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) Viruses in the United States and the Impact of Seasonal Influenza on A(H5N1) Immunity).
It has also been suggested that repeated receipt of the seasonal flu shot might provide some degree of protection, due to the similarity of the H1N1 and the Bovine H5N1 NA gene segment (see EID Journal: A(H5N1) NA Inhibition Antibodies in Healthy Adults after Exposure to Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09).
At least, that's the hope.
As with previous studies, they found`very low levels of pre-existing binding antibodies to the HA head of the HPAI A(H5N1) 2.3.4.4b virus', but slightly more encouragingly, `. . . substantial cross-reactive binding antibodies to N1 neuraminidase (NA) of 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1).
Neuraminidase antibodies have been considered as an independent correlate to protect against influenza 20. Although they cannot prevent infection, neuraminidase antibodies can prevent virus egress, reduce viral shedding, and thus could attenuate disease and lessen disease severity 21,22,23.
Once again, how much actual `protection' that might provide is unknown - particularly given their age-related comorbidities - although we did see lower impacts on that birth cohort during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.
On a more positive note, the authors report `. . . pre-pandemic stockpiled 2.3.4.4c vaccine can elicit cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies to 2.3.4.4b A.', although vaccine supplies would be quite limited during the opening months of any pandemic (see Maggie Fox's SCI AM - A Bird Flu Vaccine Might Come Too Late to Save Us from H5N1).
Today's report is both lengthy and detailed, and you'll want to follow the link to read it in its entirety. I'll have a brief postscript after you return.
Open access Published: 08 December 2025
Volume 16, article number 10954, (2025)Zhu-Nan Li, Feng Liu, Yu-Jin Jung, Stacie Jefferson, Crystal Holiday, F. Liaini Gross, Wen-Pin Tzeng, Paul Carney, Ashley Kates, Ian A. York, Nasia Safdar, James Zhou, Marie-jo Medina, Vittoria Cioce, Christine M. Oshansky, C. Todd Davis, James Stevens, Terrence Tumpey & Min Z. Levine
Abstract
The unprecedented 2.3.4.4b. A(H5N1) outbreak in dairy cattle, poultry, and spillover to humans in the United States (US) poses a major public health threat. Population immunity is a critical component of influenza pandemic risk assessment.
We assessed the pre-existing cross-reactive immunity to 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) viruses and analyzed 1794 sera from 723 people (0.5–88 yrs) in multiple US geographic regions during 2021–2024. Pre-existing neutralizing and hemagglutinin (HA)-head-binding antibodies to A(H5N1) were low, but there were substantial cross-reactive binding antibodies to N1 neuraminidase (NA) of 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1). Antibodies to group 1 HA stalk were also prevalent and increased with age.
A(H1N1)pdm09 infection and influenza vaccination did not induce neutralizing antibodies to A(H5N1) viruses but induced significant rise of functional NA inhibition (NAI) antibodies to N1 of 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1), and group 1 HA stalk antibodies. Moreover, pre-pandemic stockpiled 2.3.4.4c vaccine can elicit cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies to 2.3.4.4b A.
(SNIP)
In this study, we assessed the levels of neutralizing antibodies, HA head binding antibodies, functional NA inhibition antibodies (NAI), NA binding antibodies to HPAI clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) viruses, and antibodies to group 1 HA stalk using 1794 sera collected from 723 participants (aged 0.5–88 yrs) from multiple geographic regions in the US across recent influenza seasons (2021–2024). We investigated whether there were pre-existing cross-reactive immunity to 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) viruses in the US population, and whether current seasonal influenza A virus infection or seasonal influenza vaccination can induce antibodies that are cross-reactive to 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) viruses. Lastly, we also assessed the ability of the pre-pandemic stockpiled 2.3.4.4c A(H5) vaccine to elicit cross-reactive antibody responses to these newer 2.3.4.4b viruses.
(SNIP)
Our study has limitations, first, the clinical protective functions of the cross-reactive neuraminidase and HA stalk antibodies to A(H5N1) viruses in humans need to be further understood; second, although we assessed multiple antibody targets; other adaptive immunity, such as cell-mediated immunity which can also be associated with reduction of influenza disease severity16, were not assessed here.
Host immunity is a critical parameter in assessing population susceptibility to influenza virus infections. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses the Influenza Risk Assessment Tool (IRAT)49 to evaluate the pandemic potential for a novel influenza A virus. Population immunity is one of the risk elements used in the IRAT. Our study provides additional data for A(H5N1) pandemic risk assessment. Further studies are needed to better understand the immune responses to A(H5N1) viruses in humans and to what extent pre-existing immunity can deter infection and/or lessen disease severity. Continued surveillance is essential to closely monitor A(H5) viruses for pandemic preparedness.
As alluded to at the top of this blog, HPAI H5 comes in a lot of `flavors', and this study focussed on the `bovine' H5N1 virus isolated in Texas last year. Exactly how other genotypes/subtypes would compare, remains to be elucidated.
Complicating matters further, we've also seen cautionary reports (see St. Jude Researchers: Current Antivirals Likely Less Effective Against Severe Infection Caused by Bird Flu in Cows’ Milk), suggesting our antiviral armamentarium may be inadequate for dealing with an H5 pandemic.Which means - unpopular as they might be - NPIs (non-pharmaceutical interventions like masks, social distancing, etc.) will once again become our first line of defense.
Not ideal, obviously. But they proved their worth during the last pandemic, and will likely do so again.
Assuming, of course, enough people have the foresight to stockpile masks and respirators before the next crisis emerges.






